The Air Force and the Navy do not flirt and embarrass each other. The Naval Management Committee will be happy and healthy

(0) 讚！ | 落雁文景

Have you submitted your manuscript for review yet? How long does the external review process take?

(0) 讚！ | 东风谷雪磊

Learning a new language is challenging, but with practice and dedication, anyone can succeed

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Manuscript of the article

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is MS?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

How many words are generally required for an article title?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

I submitted two articles to this magazine, and both were eventually accepted, which is really comforting. Let me talk about the review process. The first submission was made in January 2016, and it took about a month and a half to receive feedback. There were three reviewers, one minor revision and two major revisions were suggested. They all seemed like peers in the field, so I followed their advice and submitted the revised version after about a month. One reviewer was still not satisfied a month later, so I made further revisions and resubmitted, which was finally accepted. The whole process took four months, and the editors were very nice and fair

(0) 讚！ | 奕叶mio

Another paper was submitted in May of this year, taking six months to go through the process. There were still three reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision, and even one major major revision. I have reached the edge of pain, feeling all kinds of problems, but all three reviewers have affirmed the significance of this work. With gritted teeth, I made revisions for a month, submitted it, and received it back in about twenty days. Both reviewers were satisfied, but the nitpicky reviewer continued to nitpick. It could also be that my responses were too forceful. After nearly a month of revisions, it was submitted again. A month later, it was accepted. Overall, this journal seems to have a decent level of international attention and seems quite difficult to submit to. Good luck to everyone!

(0) 讚！ | Deirdre Alerander

I submitted my research article back in May this year, and after six months I finally received the peer reviews. There were three reviewers; two reviewers recommended major revisions, while one reviewer suggested minor edits. The reviews are constructive but exhausting; one of the reviewers wasn’t completely satisfied with my edits until after three rounds of revision. Overall, I have a positive impression of this journal and the international readership is quite high; however, it is a difficult submission process.

(3) 讚！ | Nick

has submitted two manuscripts in this journal and eventually acceptd them. I still feel very happy.Let me talk about the review process.The first submission was in January of 16 years. About one and a half months later, the three reviewers, one minor repair and two overhauls, felt that they were all small peers in the field. According to their opinions, they were submitted for about one month.After one month, there is still a reviewer dissatisfied, re-editing and submitting the application; the whole process lasts for four months, and the editor is very nice.

(3) 讚！ | wang.10997@osu.du

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: This is a journal worth trying, with strict peer review. It took me quite a while to get my paper accepted

(0) 讚！ | 荷珠小郎君

The impact factor is not bad, and strive to enter the second district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.The editor is very good and the review is very professional.

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

Review Speed: 3.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted in September 2014, revised in November 2014, and final revision in December 2014, quite fast

(0) 讚！ | 天元小姐姐

It's way too unpredictable, even a little lower than last year. I doubt if we can maintain our 3-point lead next year

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Bullish, will it rise again next year?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

recently published a molecule about cell membrane channelsDynamics simulation.My manuscript has only two reviewers, and the speed of review is good.One thing to note is that the editors we encounter are better, and even if a reviewer's opinion is poor, he will give an opportunity to explain or modify.If there is related work, it is worth recommending everyone to try.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Biological and physical chemistry research is a relatively good journal material, the speed of review is relatively slow, generally requires three reviewers, three months.Because it is a monthly journal, it will take a while to receive it after receiving it, but it will be available online soon.Because it is a journal of biophysical chemistry, the content of the research should have three relevant contents, but the biological aspect is relatively important.The younger brother recently published it again, and the overall feeling is not bad.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

It's difficult, English requires a higher level

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁