Hello classmate, I would like to ask why my revision did not pass the editing review,
Manuscript (clean)
Manuscript - marked version
Rebuttal letter
Checklist

There was no missing file to upload

I have been rejected twice, but I did not receive an email telling me what went wrong. Is there anything I should pay attention to?

(0) 讚！ | ha

Round 1:
Manuscript Under Consideration August 16th
Decision Sent to Author October 27th (Major Revision)
Round 2:
Manuscript Under Consideration November 24th
Decision Sent to Author December 10th (Minor Revision, Still under Review)
Round 3:
Manuscript Under Consideration December 13th
Waiting to Send Decision to Author December 22nd
Decision Sent to Author January 9th (AIP)
Round 4:
Manuscript Under Consideration January 17th
Decision Sent to Author January 19th (Accept

(15) 讚！ | aar3278

Approximately two months after submission, the results are given. The review comments are very insightful and include many additional experiments. After revising for three weeks, the article is accepted, taking a total of about four months. I have a positive view of this journal, except that the article processing charge (APC) is too expensive at $3500.

(0) 讚！ | 浅浅and蓝蓝

This journal has already reached the top ranking in its field... But it is indeed good, there are not many in our direction.

(2) 讚！ | 东半球浓眉哥

A very promising journal, with three reviewers, accepted after one round of revisions. It took approximately 4 and a half months from submission to online publication.

(2) 讚！ | jedisirius

Who is willing to pay for the layout fee of 2990?

(0) 讚！ | 浒

Submitted another article, and after 35 days, scored another one. Sigh.

(0) 讚！ | 大娃娃

Abandon this journal, I do not recommend submitting to this magazine. If they reject it outright after major revisions, it would save a lot of time, but if both major and minor revisions are rejected in the end, it would be a waste of time.

(0) 讚！ | 大娃娃

It took six months for the submission to be reviewed. After two months, major revisions were suggested. After one month of making the revisions, it was sent back. Two months later, minor revisions were suggested. After one week of making the revisions, it was sent back again. After half a month, the result was received, and the manuscript was rejected. The reason given was that the English language proficiency was not sufficient, and the fifth issue raised during the minor revisions was not resolved satisfactorily. Additionally, the abstract figure was not acceptable to the reviewers.

Summary: It was a tiring and anticipated process. However, what matters is the process itself, not just the result.

(9) 讚！ | 大娃娃

A very good journal, a total of 5 reviewers, and all of them gave good opinions. The editor waived our publication fee. I wish the journal better and better, and the impact factor is expected to be over 9 next year.

(1) 讚！ | 天行健35