0528 Still with editor

(0) 讚！ | Gbbb

20240520 submitted
20240520 with editor
20240524 with editor
The journal's website says the first decision is supposed to be made within 3 days, but it feels like it's taking longer than before. Is this bad news?

(0) 讚！ | Gbbb

Now we can't choose, but we used to be able to

(0) 讚！ | liyifan1996

May I ask if you have chosen the editor Yang Jian from Pennsylvania State University in the United States yourself?

(0) 讚！ | 搞科研的小郑

Hello, how do you choose a chief editor?

(0) 讚！ | 搞科研的小郑

How to choose the chief editor actively?

(0) 讚！ | 搞科研的小郑

Is the impact factor expected to exceed 20 this year? Are domestic journals just journals of social courtesy?

(0) 讚！ | 骆驼2021

Why were all the reviewer's comments modifications and still the paper was rejected?

(0) 讚！ | LYH不要996

Submitted twice and rejected both times, watching as the magazine score increased from 8 to 18. Finally submitted what I thought was my best work and finally got what I wanted. Overall, the magazine has a very fast processing speed, and rejection doesn't waste any time. The reviewers' comments are quite professional and can indeed improve the quality of the article.

2024.01.09 Submitted
2024.02.14 Required review completed
2024.02.16 Major Revision (four reviewers, all very positive)
2024.02.28 Revision Submitted (47 pages, over 7000 words)
2024.02.29 With editor
2024.03.21 Accept
2024.02.28

For reference only
Hope the magazine continues to improve and breaks the 20-point threshold soon

(1) 讚！ | Samael

1. Rejection after initial submission, rejection after external review, with feedback from three reviewers as follows:
1. ****** typical phrases. However, some significant revisions are needed before consideration for publication.
2. ****** typical phrases. However, there are still some shortcomings in the manuscript that need improvement. Specific suggestions and issues are outlined below:
3. ****** typical phrases. However, some additional content is needed in certain areas to aid reader comprehension. The following issues should be addressed for publication.
In conclusion, the quality and standards of this journal are evident to all. As a shining example of domestic research, it has indeed made significant contributions to our country's scientific research level, and is worth submitting to

(2) 讚！ | 号号

How are you, buddy?

(0) 讚！ | Samael

2023.12.13 under review
The date has been updated frequently these days, I wonder what's going on

(0) 讚！ | 金狼

2023.12.12 under review

(0) 讚！ | 金狼

Hello, how did it go?

(0) 讚！ | 枯叶蝶

2023.12.11 under review

(0) 讚！ | 金狼

2023.12.01 submitted
2023.12.02 with editor
2023.12.04 under review

(0) 讚！ | 金狼

Share your most recent submission experience. Submitted on August 5th, assigned to Professor Yang Jian for review after about two days. The review period was about 3 weeks. Received revision comments on September 3rd, a total of four reviewers, 2 minor revisions and 2 major revisions. Returned for revisions on October 7th, submitted on the same day, and accepted on October 27th. Overall, the paper was processed quickly and the expert reviewers were very nice

(1) 讚！ | ewpope

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and label them as "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(0) 讚！ | 阿斯顿飞规就

We submitted an article from our group at the end of 2021. We were originally a laboratory focused on data analysis, and this was our first article after 5 years of accumulating biological materials. We had no reputation in the field, and when we submitted it to this journal, we faced review from 6 referees who bombarded us in turn. However, we were able to make revisions that satisfied them and the article was accepted

(0) 讚！ | zzy0630

Just received a paper on intestinal organ-on-a-chip and its biological applications. The paper was initially rejected after major revisions by AM, but then accepted by BAM in less than three months. The specific review status is as follows:

2023.4.7 submit
2023.4.7 under review on the same day
2023.4.13, 4.20, 4.28, 5.5 change dates, status still under review
2023.5.25 required review completed
2023.5.28 major revision (four reviewers, three positive and one neutral)
2023.6.11 revision submitted, under review on the same day
2023.7.1 accept

(1) 讚！ | 固执的北极熊

Posted on 05.02, it has been a week and it still shows "submitted to journal." Too slow, it hasn't even reached the editor yet. The efficiency is too low!

(0) 讚！ | 阿斯顿飞规就

2023.04.21 Submission
2023.0419 with editor
Coating for medical urinary catheters, hoping for review.

(0) 讚！ | NIHAO MAMA

2023.04.18 Submitted
2023.04.19 with editor
Bone repair coating, hoping for review

(2) 讚！ | Xiaokang Na

Do you have a link to the article? I'm very interested.

(0) 讚！ | 氦酚素