Calculate the mean by using Average(), the standard deviation by using STDEV.S(), and the standard error of the mean by using STDEV.S()/COUNT()^0.5

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The method of relative quantification in qPCR is ΔΔCT method, which first calibrates with internal reference genes, and then calculates the difference between the sample and the control group

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to process the results of qPCR?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

How to calculate the margin of error?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

However, I submitted a review article before the new year, and it has been under peer review for almost 2 months now. Should I continue to wait or should I write to the editor to inquire about the status?

(0) 讚！ | 乌龙姝丽

I would like to ask, did you submit a research article or a review? I submitted a review article a while ago, and I still haven't heard anything back. It has been over 2 months now

(0) 讚！ | 乌龙姝丽

So, I want to ask, how did it all turn out in the end?

(0) 讚！ | 乌龙姝丽

I applied at the end of December 2020 and haven't heard anything yet

(0) 讚！ | 乌龙姝丽

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as the headers:

这是一段测试翻译的文本

(0) 讚！ | 法慧和同

Has anyone been submitting to this magazine recently?

(0) 讚！ | 佛光运盛

Is the review process fast?

(0) 讚！ | 佛光运盛

Declining year by year

(0) 讚！ | 孤云永顺

Majoring in medicinal chemistry, we conducted fungal cell apoptosis research. We revised it once and resubmitted it. It took a toll on us over the past seven months. However, the journal is very responsible and finally accepted our paper. It was submitted at the end of August 2017, accepted by the end of February 2018, published online in March, and published in early April

(0) 讚！ | Deirdre Alerander

Drug chemistry, do fungal cell apoptosis, overhauled once, continue to select, 7 months before and after,Feeling tired.However, this journal is very responsible and finally accepted it. It will be thrown out at the end of August 2017, received at the end of February 2018, online in March, and published in early April.

(0) 讚！ | 1320001513@qq.com

I’m not impressed with this journal. My co-authors and I submitted our manuscript in February, and after three months the status of our manuscript was never updated. After reaching out to the editor, we received two reviews, but the reviewer’s comments were minimal and of no scientific value. Reconsider submitting to this journal.

(1) 讚！ | Anonymous

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: This magazine feels very bad. I submitted an article in February, and it took nearly 3 months without any response. After sending a reminder, the editor casually found someone to review it and rejected it. There was only one reviewer's opinion, and it was extremely unprofessional and irresponsible. I suggest being cautious when submitting to this journal!

(0) 讚！ | 碧桃梓希

A very trashy magazine, submitted in February, but after nearly 3 months there was no response. After urging, the editor irresponsibly found someone to just glance at it and reject it. There were only two reviewers, but only one gave feedback, and the feedback was extremely unprofessional and irresponsible. I suggest everyone to be cautious when submitting articles, what a bloody lesson!

(0) 讚！ | 墟散梓涵

High point? Now is the low point!

(0) 讚！ | 是你的逸致呀

Overall, compared to JBC, it falls a bit short even though its IF is higher

(0) 讚！ | 伏象谷梦

is a good journal with a long history.The impact factor is bullish next year.

(5) 讚！ | thomas

From review to acceptance, it took 3 months, which is fine. The suggestions made were very constructive

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It's been two whole months with no news at all, hoping for good luck in the Year of the Horse!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: This journal, although an established one, has a slightly higher impact factor than JBC, but the review process doesn't feel as stringent as JBC. It may depend on the novelty of the submitted articles. The number of reviewers can vary, sometimes few and sometimes many. Overall, if the lab has some accumulation or relevant papers, the review speed of this journal is still quite fast, with a lot of detailed comments, but not overly difficult. After all, experiments can't be perfect

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: This journal is a well-established and reputable one. The feedback provided is very constructive, but the revision requirements are quite stringent. It took me six months to finally get accepted after numerous edits

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Stupid, with poor abilities

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁