I read a lot of comments and experiences here before submitting my first article. Here is my timeline for reference:

3.10 Submitted
3.13 Under Review
3.19 Required Reviews Complete (Editor invited 7 reviewers, 2 agreed to review, then editor invited 6 more reviewers, none agreed, but the first 2 reviewers completed their reviews)
3.25 Review Complete, received revision suggestions
4.2 Returned with Editor revisions
4.3 Accept

The overall speed was quite fast. I was in a hurry to graduate and was constantly rushing. I was afraid I wouldn't make it in time. From submission to acceptance in less than a month

(0) 讚！ | 七月窗台的猫

It's been two weeks and it still hasn't been submitted for review. The first time I submitted it, it was quite fast, but this time it's so slow

(0) 讚！ | Alicehyz

Hello, I would like to ask how long it took for you to review my submission from the time of submission. This question is important to me because it is required by my school. I hope you understand.

(0) 讚！ | yolo-jia

Hello, I would like to ask how long it took you from submitting to review? I'm sorry to bother you, and I hope you can reply.

(0) 讚！ | yolo-jia

Hello, I would like to ask how long it took for you to submit and review this journal? Sorry to bother you.

(0) 讚！ | yolo-jia

Doing academia for 5 years, this is the most frustrating time. I invited six reviewers, and they all agreed to review. In the end, only four reviewers came back, with two major revisions, one acceptance, and one minor revision. The editor rejected me... rejected me!!!!!! My life is ruined. Where is the justice? Where is fairness?

(1) 讚！ | 小方的打工仔

May I ask if this journal is indexed in two months?

(0) 讚！ | Jinji_Lau

Submitted for review on the same day, the speed was very fast. Received feedback on the manuscript after three weeks. There were a total of four reviewers, with minor revisions. Accepted one week later. The speed was incredibly fast. Hoping for an increase in the impact factor.

(0) 讚！ | Alicehyz

I submitted an article on wastewater testing, and the initial review took about four months. Three reviewers raised many questions and suggested revisions. The overall suggestion was a major overhaul, otherwise the paper would be rejected. At that time, upon receiving this email, I felt like my fate was hanging by a thread, but I didn't want to give up. So, I made significant revisions and carefully addressed each question raised by the reviewers. After submitting the revised manuscript and response, it took another two months, but it was ultimately accepted for publication.

(0) 讚！ | tyca

6.10 Submission
7.6 Feedback for major revisions
8.1 Submission
8.11 Received reviewer comments
8.11 Accepted
It took exactly two months in total, with two reviewers. One asked a few simple questions, and the other suggested language modifications in various parts. The editing was rigorous and provided major revisions. The efficiency was also high, as it was accepted within 10 days of submission.

(0) 讚！ | llliii122

The review process was fast, and the reviewers' comments were also very fair. The initial submission was made on April 30th, and the revisions were returned on May 26th. It was accepted 10 days after the re-submission at the end of June. The publication process was also quick, and received positive feedback. Hopefully, the impact factor will increase further.

(1) 讚！ | weiweiQ

From submission to acceptance, it took a little over 70 days, quite fast.

(0) 讚！ | yangkun

May I ask if the original poster needs confirmation from co-authors when submitting a post?

(0) 讚！ | xwslby

The speed is really fast, it takes two days for review, and more than twenty days for the first review result. The repair is also quickly accepted. If you are in a hurry to graduate and it is related to the direction, you can submit it.

(0) 讚！ | xiyecc

There is a "Guide for authors" on the homepage, and I made the necessary changes according to the requirements in it before submitting my manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | yxxxxx

I would like to ask where can I find the template for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | yhx

Hello! I am another editor, and the decision will be made soon.

(0) 讚！ | lmzhao

2021.3.16 Submission
2021.4.18 Major revision
2021.6.03 Minor revision
2021.6.08 Accepted
Three reviewers, 2 major revisions, 1 minor revision, a total of 16 suggested modifications. The journal is quite efficient and fast.

(1) 讚！ | yxxxxx

Excuse me, may I ask which editor you are? My second review has already been completed, but the editor has not replied for over ten days. Is there something wrong? I am referring to the editor from Japan.

(0) 讚！ | cxjkaixin

It is not easy to obtain recognition from four experts as reviewers. The editors are very conscientious and responsible, hoping to increase the impact factor.

(14) 讚！ | lmzhao

7.12, submission; It was under review in 4 days; 8.16, the revision comments were received. There were 4 reviewers and many comments. However, there was no need to supplement the experience; 9.12, the revised manuscript was submitted; 9.22, the revision comments were received again. There were 2 reviewers and 9 comments; 9.25, the revised manuscript was submitted again; 9.27, accepted.

(2) 讚！ | Petermu35

I used to browse others’ submission experience before, so let me share something today. 2020.1.6 first submission, 2020.1.10 sent for review, 2020.2.3 receive rejection letter. There was only one reviewer who gave a lot of comments. Both the editor and the reviewer indicated that I can resubmit it after revision. The reviewer’s comments were clear and pertinent. I perfected the manuscript according to the questions. I resubmitted the manuscript on March 19, 2020. It was Decision in Process less than two weeks after Under Review. Review comments returned a few days later. Two reviewers made some suggestions for revision. I made corresponding revision and resubmitted it. It was accepted on April 28, 2020.

(3) 讚！ | 波上寒烟

2019.09.21, submission; 2019.10.26, major revision; 2019.12.22, revision submitted. 2020.01.29, minor revision; 2020.03.03, accept. I remember that I used to come to the comments section to see other people's experience after submission and count the time of my own article. Now I also share my own experience, for the students to refer to the (writing of) first article in the future, thank you.

(4) 讚！ | 喵子

I hope that the impact factor goes up

(2) 讚！ | lmzhao

1 month to return to the review comments, giving two months to modify the time.Some of the suggestions given are still very professional.This year's impact factor has finally risen.I hope that I can increase the number of articles. It is not easy to say a few words in a year.

(2) 讚！ | 623164129@qq.com