Is there any news?

(0) 讚！ | 水月凝心

Could you please confirm if the status given at the end of the first review is "revise"? How much time was given for revisions? Wasn't it mentioned that this journal does not have a second review process?

(0) 讚！ | 绵掌嘉颖

I submitted it on the 23rd and it feels very slow.

(0) 讚！ | 水月凝心

Review speed: 1.0
Sharing experience: I revised the research article submitted on September 22nd, not a letter. Received editorial comments on October 10th, requesting original, uncut full membrane content. Unfortunately, I did not have it, so I had to decline. ?

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

How are you now?

(0) 讚！ | 无冬瑞东

You are still very fast. Does this magazine require a layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

Submitted on 10.16, it is still submitted to the journal.

(0) 讚！ | 无冬瑞东

When will the review be?

(0) 讚！ | 无冬瑞东

I entered the review stage on March 28th, received the review comments on April 14th, and the status changed to "revise" with one month given to make revisions.

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission success rate: 75.0

Experience sharing: Just a note, hoping to help everyone. Submitted on March 25th, entered the review stage on March 28th (under review) and received review comments on April 14th, status changed to revise and was given one month to make revisions. After revising on May 5th, the status remained with the editor until May 7th when it changed to Decision in process, and was accepted the next day.

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0

Experience sharing: The review speed of BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL is relatively fast, around 8 weeks, and the review process is very strict, with responsible editors. If conditions allow, it is recommended to seek guidance from colleagues or institutions, as it can improve efficiency and smooth out the process.

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

Review speed: 6.0 Experience sharing: It took a total of more than 2 months from submission in early June to first review in mid-July. The first review was completed on August 29th, the second review on September 17th, with still two or three minor comments remaining. After revising, it continued to be reviewed on September 25th and was accepted.

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

Very good.

(0) 讚！ | 通背泽民

Is there any news now?

(0) 讚！ | 绵掌嘉颖

Can you please translate the following paragraph into English?

(0) 讚！ | 洗髓正汉

Excuse me, what date is it now, friends?

(0) 讚！ | 西风思捷

Is the original image WB filtered?

(0) 讚！ | 咏春紫南

I am 6352. Please provide the original image. I have resubmitted.

(0) 讚！ | 四象冰丝

Same here, I also received this email.

(0) 讚！ | 四象冰丝

What issue number is your manuscript in? Any updates? I'm in a similar situation as you, still in the initial stage.

(0) 讚！ | 昊英大叔

I submitted a research article on 8.17, not a letter, and then received editorial comments on September 5: Provide a scale for the original uncut full film + microscope image of the Western Blot (WB) (not magnification). Since I did not have this, I had to resubmit.

(0) 讚！ | Mortimer Beard

It should be, short communication might be faster.

(0) 讚！ | Mortimer Beard

Research focus: Sharing of animal experimental experience. May I ask what number are we currently at? I submitted mine on 8.21 and haven't heard anything yet.

(0) 讚！ | Jeff Onions

Many people say this speed is fast, but it seems wrong.
Fast refers to choosing its short com format, but we can't choose it. It seems like a trap.
Choosing the normal RE mode is very slow, are we being deceived?

(0) 讚！ | 深渊沛凝

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: It is said that this journal is fast, but it's not that fast. It's been two months and still no preliminary results. Is the so-called fast referring to the fact that you must choose to submit a short communication to it? But who can choose that? It's not solid enough.

(0) 讚！ | 深渊沛凝