May 14, 24: Submitted revision suggestions
May 15, 24: Awaiting Admin Processing
May 16, 24: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
May 18, 24: Awaiting Reviewer Score
June 1, 24: Awaiting AE Recommendation
June 2, 24: Minor Revision (New journal requirement, must submit video abstract)
June 5, 24: Submitted video abstract
June 5, 24: Awaiting Reviewer Selection
June 14, 24: Awaiting EIC Decision
June 17, 24: Accepted

(0) 讚！ | djx666

Recording the changes in the peer review status:
January 24, 24: Submitted
January 24, 24: Awaiting Admin Processing
January 24, 24: Awaiting AE Assignment
February 6, 24: Awaiting Reviewer Selection (the AE was very slow in processing, taking one month to select reviewers)
March 2, 24: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment (reviewers quickly agreed after receiving the request)
March 7, 24: Awaiting Reviewer Score (entered review status)
March 27, 24: Awaiting AE Recommendation (the AE delayed again, prompting the editor-in-chief to replace the AE with themselves)
April 24, 24: Revise & Resubmit (after the AE was replaced, results were quickly provided)

(0) 讚！ | djx666

2022.12.09 Submission
2023.04.04 Revised and resubmitted as new
2023.06.12 Minor revision
2023.07.03 Accepted

The review process for this letter-type journal was a bit slow, taking over half a year in total. However, the reviewers were quite professional and their suggestions greatly improved the quality of the article. Overall, it was acceptable. One thing to note is that the publication of papers in this journal may take around a year from the time of acceptance, so it is not recommended for those in a hurry.

(1) 讚！ | ztW741

Um, how long do you usually take?

(0) 讚！ | 陈大圣

Review comments were usually given in 5 weeks. I revised the manuscript twice and each time I responded to the revision comments 5 weeks later. Now it has been accepted after the third minor revisions.

(0) 讚！ | cctvjack