Will the application be rejected immediately if a reapplication link is provided?

(0) 讚！ | 兔3岁

Did you resubmit after the editor rejected it?

(0) 讚！ | 兔3岁

Please translate the following passage into English: 1

(0) 讚！ | liugang

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 10.19 accept

(0) 讚！ | 埋土

In the section of submission, Reviewer 2 provided a very responsible and detailed review with 18 pages and 4796 words.

(0) 讚！ | Austines

9.26 PR
9.27 UR

Translation:
9.26 Press Release
9.27 Update Request

(0) 讚！ | 埋土

Reworking quickly was futile, in the end the peer review process dragged on for 25 days, with the paper being peer reviewed on August 17th and a decision not being made until September 10th. Based on my experience of submitting two papers last year, this journal usually takes no more than 20 days from submission to online publication. This time, luck was not on my side as I encountered an irresponsible editor who delayed the process significantly, resulting in an astonishing total duration of 46 days.

(0) 讚！ | 杰杰哥哥

You repaired it so quickly! I've been waiting for half a month.

(0) 讚！ | bobo_good

8.28 under review
9.11 Still waiting for the review comments, feeling anxious.

(0) 讚！ | bobo_good

September 11, 2024 pending English. Hope to be online as soon as possible, the processing fee of 2600 Swiss Francs has already been paid.

(0) 讚！ | 杰杰哥哥

Accepted on September 10, 2024. After a 25-day long process, the PED status was finally accepted, marking the end of the most unpleasant submission experience. Just as the second review came back, the editor went on vacation, and it took so long to process it. I was so frustrated waiting in between.

(0) 讚！ | 杰杰哥哥

I am also in PED status, and I haven't seen any results after urging. How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | 不爱吃鱼

No response yet, PED has been 20 days and still not processed, even the assistant editor is annoyed. In the past experiences, 20 days have been enough time from submission to acceptance. The comments from the second reviewer can be seen in the system, all suggesting publication, but this ghost editor is not handling it, causing a lot of delay.

(1) 讚！ | 杰杰哥哥

Can you tell me when you will be back? I am also anxious.

(0) 讚！ | yb8347

8.31 is still pending editor decision. I am in urgent need of it and have sent emails urging them as the academic editors are all on vacation. I am really frustrated with this journal. How can a open access journal like yours stop processing just because editors are on vacation? You have abandoned the only advantage of efficiency. Who would still submit to your journal? They even want to make money while doing nothing.

(0) 讚！ | 杰杰哥哥

Submission on August 28, 2024.

(0) 讚！ | lan

7.25 submitted
7.26 under review
8.8 revised
8.13 revised version uploaded
8.20 pending editor decision

(0) 讚！ | 杰杰哥哥

The speed is very fast, which is especially suitable for researchers in urgent need of articles. The downside is that it is open source and lacks high recognition.

(0) 讚！ | 杰杰哥哥

Three reviewers, fifty comments, detailed and professional. The review process is becoming increasingly stringent. However, the efficiency still leaves something to be desired.

(0) 讚！ | wang

Submission received: 13 June 2024
 Revised: 26 July 2024
Accepted: 28 July 2024
Published: 31 July 2024

(0) 讚！ | 科研羊了个羊

In a hurry to graduate, I waited for the first round of reviews for a month and a half. Two reviewers provided revision suggestions while the third reviewer didn't understand and made sarcastic comments (like "too theoretical" or "meaningless"). The editor rejected the paper but encouraged resubmission. After making revisions and resubmitting, two reviewers provided more suggestions while another reviewer raised a lot of questions, indicating a lack of understanding, unsure if it was the same person as before. Major revisions were made. After resubmission, another reviewer had doubts, leading to minor revisions. Finally, the paper was accepted, taking a total of 3 months. The review process exceeded expectations, with the reviewers being very professional. Who said they were lenient? They were definitely not lenient at all. Besides being a bit expensive, there were no issues. For someone like me who didn't have help with revising the paper, it was great to rely on the reviewers for feedback to improve the quality of the paper.

(0) 讚！ | 晓研

May I ask what's next? Can you easily share your submission timeline?

(0) 讚！ | yakira_tian

The second review has been completed. 1 rejected, 1 accepted, and 1 minor revision. The editor has not made a decision yet. What are the chances of rejection in this situation?

(1) 讚！ | sawsaa

1. The speed is very fast, whether it is rejection or acceptance.
2. The review is professional, and the questions raised are very constructive.
3. Expensive, it is really expensive.
4. The industry recognition is between acceptable and not completely acceptable.
5. Emergency publication indexing is the gospel of publication.

(0) 讚！ | Newcrown

Submission on 4.23, after major and minor revisions, accepted on 6.18, proofed on 6.19. May I ask how long it takes for the paper to be indexed in SCI after it is published online by the big names in the field? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 小油菜