11.17 提交修订稿至期刊
11.21 正在审阅

(0) 讚！ | Gaodehui

There were a total of three reviewers, 2 minor revisions and 1 rejection. The reviewer who rejected it provided some suggestions, but it was clear from his comments that he did not carefully read my paper and just hastily rejected it. To be honest, I am very disappointed with this reviewer. If he had raised constructive questions and then rejected my article, I could accept it. However, after submitting so many articles, this is the first time I have encountered such an unreasonable reviewer. This is obviously irresponsible to both the author and the journal. In conclusion, I hope others do not encounter this reviewer, as he is very unprofessional.

(1) 讚！ | cc

The investment I made on the 4th is still in WE. Is this guy from Harbin Institute of Technology so busy? If you are busy, don't be a reviewer. I have also contacted Elsevier customer service, but it was still of no use.

(0) 讚！ | CL WA

Materials Today Communications is a very good journal. I have submitted and been accepted before, but this time I have to mention editor Kai Zhu. On the day of submission, it took 23 days without any review feedback. It's not that I haven't submitted before, but why did it take so long with this editor? It's really unfortunate to encounter such an editor. Why flip the table after eating? It's pathetic!

(1) 讚！ | 1f

Hello, may I ask if this is a transfer?

(0) 讚！ | leaf_c

Sure, how do I see which editor to use?

(0) 讚！ | 天蓬元帅帅

Which editor is this in the hands of?

(0) 讚！ | 天蓬元帅帅

The 12th new submission is directly from us. How long will our status probably last?

(0) 讚！ | 天蓬元帅帅

The newly submitted one has not been processed since it was returned for some minor issues to be fixed.

(0) 讚！ | 755呦

It's been two weeks and still no progress, we've been waiting. The editing process with Kai Zhu in China is really slow.

(0) 讚！ | CL WA

How long does it generally take for reviewers to complete the review after accepting it? I hope they won't drag it out until the end. Is the deadline given by this journal one month?

(0) 讚！ | Xard

In theory, it should be returned to the reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 必须accept.

Who is the editor-in-chief of this, how do you see it?

(0) 讚！ | Xard

Could we please confirm if the revised manuscript, after being sent back for revisions, should also be sent back to the original reviewer for further review? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | dl789

Excuse me, after revising, should the revised manuscript be sent back to the original reviewer during the under review process?

(0) 讚！ | dl789

2024.8.31  WE
2024.10.26   RC
2024.11.15     ACCEPT

(0) 讚！ | 二十三

Published on November 15, 2024.
The review and publication speed is the fastest I have ever seen, period.

(0) 讚！ | W.B. Li

Are you submitting as new or for rework? Mine has been two weeks as well.

(0) 讚！ | Jarmin

Why is it always WE, it's been two weeks and the editor still hasn't dealt with it.

(0) 讚！ | 755呦

2024.09.23 Submitted to journal
2024.09.24 under review
2024.10.16 Revise
2024.10.27 Submitted to journal
2024.10.30 under review
2024.11.12 Accepted

(3) 讚！ | W.B. Li

7.28 Submission
8.4 Under review
9.18 Two minor revisions
10.20 Revision - delayed submission due to National Day holiday, postponed twice
10.29 With editor
11.3 Under review
11.9 Accepted
Smooth process, thanks to the editors and reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | caojk

My submission was also marked "with editor" after submission, and then stayed in this status for 18 days. After I sent an email to the editor, it changed to "under review" the next day.

(0) 讚！ | 科研底层打工仔

Is Emilio Martinez-Paneda the editor-in-chief? There are only two grammar issues in the second review, and it has been with the editor for 10 days for revisions. What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | Jarmin

It has been 10 days with the editor and there has been no change at all. I wonder what the editor is up to.

(0) 讚！ | Jarmin

Why did it become "with editor" just one second after submission?

(1) 讚！ | 王