Beware of garbage editing, be cautious when submitting

(0) 讚！ | 小七的日常

It's really trash, with slow speed and short height

(0) 讚！ | 小七的日常

One of the slowest journals in OA, the editorial process is extremely slow, and I will not submit to it again in the future. Those in a hurry to graduate should be cautious when submitting. I don't want to say anything more, a fighter jet in the garbage

(0) 讚！ | 小七的日常

The submission was made on March 5th, it has been two months since then. Only one of the invited reviewers has accepted the review and completed it, but the others have not responded at all. What can be done in this situation? Is there an email address for the Aquaculture Reports editorial office to follow up? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | karry123

I submitted two articles in total. The first one is about freshwater aquaculture fish. Maybe because it was difficult to find reviewers, the progress has been stuck at "under review". The reply from the editor was that one reviewer agreed to review but did not provide any comments. It took four or five months to receive feedback from three reviewers, who gave 21 days for major revisions, although not many additional experiments were needed.
The second article is about zebrafish. The review process was noticeably faster, with feedback received in about a month. The comments were mostly open discussions, and it took 21 days for minor revisions. In the discussion section, I added topics that interested the reviewers.
Overall, I feel that luck plays a significant role in the review process. The two submissions were made almost half a year apart, but both were accepted in the same month

(0) 讚！ | sunxueyi

2024/03/04 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | cnpk

Submitted to journal on 2024/02/29
With editor on 2024/03/01
No change in status, just the time has changed
With editor on 2024/03/03

(0) 讚！ | cnpk

Brother, I submitted my contribution on May 3, 2023, and as of January 25, 24, I am still under review. It's not a big deal, fortunately, or I would have lost my temper long ago. It's been 8 months, it's probably going to be a while longer

(0) 讚！ | 冰层下的虫子

After one month, the first round of revisions was given a 20-day deadline, with a total of 16 revision comments. After completing the revisions and submitting them to the editorial department, I waited for two months. In the meantime, it went "under review" twice, and in the end, it was rejected. A total of 4 months wasted

(0) 讚！ | swulwy

The review process of the journal is quite fast, and the editors are very responsible

(0) 讚！ | 永远的cat

Brother, I trusted you and only then did I invest, it's been 6 months and I still haven't seen any initial review results!

(0) 讚！ | 冰层下的虫子

I don't know if it's because of the directions, but the recirculating aquaculture system that was submitted in early May has had no updates since. It's been 6 months, I wonder if it has been forgotten

(0) 讚！ | 冰层下的虫子

He may have to defer his graduation, it's been a long time

(0) 讚！ | 真嘟假嘟

It's been almost 2 months and it's still under review, sigh

(0) 讚！ | 真嘟假嘟

Why has it been over a month since I submitted my manuscript for review and still have not received any feedback?

(0) 讚！ | 真嘟假嘟

March 28, 2023 - Submitted
April 6, 2023 - Under review
May 16, 2023 - Major revision, both reviewers provided very good feedback. One reviewer was very meticulous and gave more than 50 suggestions, but they were all minor details, no major changes. Made changes one by one accordingly.
June 6, 2023 - Sent back for revisions
June 14, 2023 - Second external review, still under review
June 27, 2023 - Still major revision, feels like there is a new reviewer who gave opposite feedback from the first external review, asking for changes to be reverted back. Made changes one by one according to the reviewer's comments, which were minor modifications.
July 10, 2023 - Sent back for revisions
July 12, 2023 - External review, still under review
July 18, 2023 - Feedback received, Reviewer 1 agrees to accept, Reviewer 2 suggests minor revisions and points out a few small details that were not changed according to their suggestions. Asked for reasons, provided explanations, added references, and sent back for revisions.
July 25, 2023 - Sent back for revisions
July 27, 2023 - Finally accepted, waiting for proof.

(0) 讚！ | 太阳hld8124

It has been slowly 5 months and still in the review process.

(0) 讚！ | 小人

It took 4 months to review, and the result is unknown. It's too slow.

(0) 讚！ | 小人

Is it really that fast? I have been submitting for more than a week and still haven't received any updates. I need to graduate soon, and I'm getting anxious.

(0) 讚！ | Annie Liu

Very good journal, fast review process, high efficiency. The reviewers' opinions are very fair.

(2) 讚！ | 飞翔xiang

If you want to graduate, vote for him.

(120) 讚！ | PENGDD

Manuscript submission: 7 July 
Review started:26 July
Reviewer report received: 26 August, the comments from the reviewers significantly strengthened the manuscript.
Manuscript accepted after second round revision on 15 December.
Editor: Good

(3) 讚！ | paulsulav@gmail.com