Submitted two months ago, received a total of 40 comments from two reviewers, which required significant revisions. The comments were detailed and constructive. However, I don't understand why the editor gave a "minor revision" decision and requested it to be completed within three weeks. With a sense of luck, I spent three weeks revising according to the "minor" comments, only to be rejected

(0) 讚！ | Ringo

My submission has been "Under Review" for a month now. Does this mean it's being reviewed? I'm getting anxious about when I will receive feedback on the manuscript. I'm afraid it will keep getting delayed.

(0) 讚！ | jianghenji

I would like to ask, how long is the deadline for the editor to review the revised manuscript? It has been two weeks since my article was sent back for revision, and one of the reviewers has not completed the review yet. I am worried about having to invite a third reviewer again.

(0) 讚！ | 内置网上的核糖体

My situation is similar to yours. We both have been "with editor" for a while, then we reminded them and entered "under review" status. However, no one seems to have received the manuscript for review, and it has remained in this state. The key question is, how did you contact the editor? I don't know who the editor is, and I don't have their email address either. I can only send emails to the Elsevier publisher through the email channel provided in the system.

(0) 讚！ | 邓哈哈

My external review took a direct 9 months, and I gave up. Then the editor directly hired me without needing any modifications. It can be considered a blessing in disguise.

(0) 讚！ | AM MAN

It’s too slow. It was submitted more than a month ago, and it is still with editor... I want to urge the manuscript.

(1) 讚！ | velen

It was submitted more than 3 months ago, and still with editor. It took 6 months from submission to acceptance in the last time.

(3) 讚！ | SC_