What's the status of the original poster? How many days until submission?

(0) 讚！ | 十五名

The author guidelines and contact page are both down. Does anyone know what to do?

(0) 讚！ | 886

How long does it take for a response afterward?

(0) 讚！ | LiuHengaa

This year, IF can reach 4.6.

(0) 讚！ | Liu12322

CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology
Corresponding author
Sanjay Raj
First author
Sanjay Raj
Received at Editorial Office
27 Jul 2022
first revision submitted -5 Nov
Article revised
21 Dec 2022
Article accepted for publication
21 Dec 2022

(0) 讚！ | Sanjay Raj

Maybe it's because of the slow processing at the end of the year, my paper "Decision in process" has been two months already.

(0) 讚！ | Liu12322

How long does it take for this journal article to be published and indexed?

(0) 讚！ | welder

Hello, after I submitted it, the status has been showing as "submitted to journal" and I haven't received an article number. What is the situation?

(0) 讚！ | 坏米

Did they send an email saying you were hired, and then kept asking you to make modifications? And they kept making revisions through external review?

(0) 讚！ | 叶子子

It was submitted in May 2020 and has been revised for the sixth time. We revised the language, the consistency of expression, the unit, the error, the punctuation, and all the formats, which were really speechless and made me sick. If you want us to revise again, we will directly refuse to.

(0) 讚！ | sdu

Submission: 2019.11.16; revision required in the first review: 2020.05.08; revision submitted: 2020.07.17; Accepted: 2020.08.10; Online publication: 2020.08.22. It was submitted in November 2019, and accepted in August 2020. The editing process was very fast, but the submission cycle in this time was relatively long. It was mainly affected by the epidemic. At first, they could not find a sufficient number of reviewers. Later, I urged the review progress through the support center of Elsevier. One of the reviewers gave comments for revision, and the editor also participated in the review and gave comments for revision. The opinions for revision were mainly requirements for language expression and experimental details. Due to the high language requirements of the journal, it took a lot of time for us to make careful revisions. After submitting the revised manuscript, the editor dealt with it quickly, and the reviewer agreed to accept it. In general, the editors and reviewers were responsible, and the opinions given were very pertinent. The statements in the paper must be complete, and special attention must be paid to the language.

(1) 讚！ | Harry

This journal is so ridiculous. A few words were reviewed for another month. There were no constructive comments. They always let us revise the expression and the commas. Every time it would be re-reviewed for a month, and opinions for several words would be raised, which is unbelievable. This has been the fifth time for revision. Well, a weird journal.

(2) 讚！ | wow_