The impression is very poor. It has been submitted for more than half a year, always under external review, and no response after sending a reminder letter. Someone around me got accepted, but it seems to be more about luck, perhaps they prefer theoretical submissions. In any case, be cautious when submitting!!!! Relationship between journal and garbage

(0) 讚！ | chdgjq

It takes two months for the article to be under review with the editor

(0) 讚！ | 夜孤星

To XXCSP: Submitted half a month earlier than you, also with editor. The deadline was changed once, and then with editor until now. The progress is really too slow!!!

(0) 讚！ | chi了两个桃

The journal is a bit slow in reviewing, it hasn't been submitted yet

(0) 讚！ | XXCSP

Hello, has your article been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 墨言溃

Hello, do all authors need to register an account and confirm their status before submitting to this journal?

(0) 讚！ | XXCSP

Looking forward to good luck~
Nov 21, 2023   Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | XXCSP

11.9 rrc
11.16 dip

(0) 讚！ | 玉清

I wrote a theoretical article and it was rejected in the second round of review. I tried submitting it to 6 or 7 other journals, all of which rejected it directly. Finally, it has been sent for review here. Hoping for good luck.
10.15 submit
10.16 with editor
10.19 with editor
10.23 under review

(0) 讚！ | 玉清

Too slow, it took nearly a year to apply, reminders didn't work, but luckily I was finally hired

(0) 讚！ | 巴沙鱼

Submitted two articles, both were not approved for review. Chinese journals and journals edited by Chinese people really focus on relationships. Please submit with caution

(0) 讚！ | 寒武纪

The reviewing process is too slow, it has been 10 months and it is still under review.

(3) 讚！ | ShiPhd

I previously submitted a purely numerical simulation article, but three days later, the editor rejected it due to insufficient algorithmic innovation.

In October 2021, I submitted a purely experimental article, and it finally went through the review process. However, the review process was very long, and I didn't receive the major revision comments until the end of July this year. There were three reviewers who provided approximately 20 comments, and they were all very professional.

On September 14th, I submitted the revised comments, and after more than ten days of review, there was no need for a second revision. The article was directly accepted, taking a total of about 11 months.

The overall quality of the journal paper is good, but the review speed is average, and there may be a certain rejection rate.

PS: The impact factor has risen rapidly this year, showing great potential.

(20) 讚！ | DFEM

This stupid journal took nearly 6 months for review and ultimately rejected the submission without any comments, just saying that they have a large volume of manuscripts. It delayed me for half a year. Everyone, don't be fooled. This is clearly a journal that favors personal connections. Maybe you need to have a good relationship with the editor-in-chief to have a quick and smooth process. Be cautious when submitting to journals with Chinese editors-in-chief!

(10) 讚！ | 凶巴巴

Hello, may I ask how to view the review comments on the webpage? I have been searching for a while but couldn't find it. Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 一直在路上-kxy

Has your matter been resolved? I also submitted mine for review in August or September last year and it is still under external review.

(0) 讚！ | 一直在路上-kxy

Civil engineering, underground direction. I submitted several articles but all of them were rejected by the editor. The three rejection reasons: lack of innovation, poor language, and inconsistency with the theme. I submitted to TUST and they returned it, and when I submitted to this editor, they still didn't accept it.

First, they said the language was not good enough and asked me to revise it. I revised it and provided proof of revision, but then they said it didn't match the theme. It's really ridiculous!

(1) 讚！ | Carl1993

Hello, how long should I wait after the repair? I have been through the initial review for almost four months, and it has been a month since the minor repair was sent back, but it is still "under review". I am hesitant about whether I should urge for the submission...

(0) 讚！ | gotunneling

The speed is too slow. From the end of September last year to the end of April now, it is still under review.

(2) 讚！ | xiaomaotongxue

With the editor directly rejecting it for a month, this journal has a rejection rate.

(2) 讚！ | 大魔王

The journal is very good and has great potential in the field of railway transportation.

(0) 讚！ | 晨曦1234

I have been with the editor for a month too... Is there any solution to this?

(0) 讚！ | paigu001

In the past three months, my paper was rejected during the initial review due to a lack of innovation. It's really a waste of time. If you have time constraints, I suggest submitting to another journal. The chief editor of the article is Academician Chen from China.

(2) 讚！ | dwwadadawdw

Very slow, very slow, very slow. Submit with caution. Judging from the manuscript number, the reviewing task of this journal is not considered heavy, but the speed is really difficult to express in words.

(19) 讚！ | dwwadadawdw