The template was rejected, possibly still not meeting the journal's intentions.

(0) 讚！ | 代码君

11-08 Pending review

11-08 待审核

(0) 讚！ | 代码君

The majority of the low-rated reviews were actually rejected submissions. I thought the journal was mediocre, but it turns out I am even worse. Feeling ashamed and angry. Despite being average, this journal is not something that just anyone can submit to. It is indexed in the Chinese Academy of Sciences Zone 2, so apart from being a bit expensive, there is nothing wrong with it.

(0) 讚！ | xfsyzxy

The assistant editor responded quickly, the chief editor assigned promptly, and the suggestions from the reviewers were very professional, which greatly improved the quality of our paper. The overall impression is good!

(0) 讚！ | xfsyzxy

In the field of plant phenotype, I don't even dare to compete with you.

(0) 讚！ | SCI写手

Give me your ID, and I can take a look for you.

(0) 讚！ | 凡繁

The application I submitted on June 18th is still under review, and I haven't received any updates.

(0) 讚！ | ccc

Submitted on June 29th, under review as of July 5th, still no updates at the moment.

(0) 讚！ | PPPD

Which number did you vote for?

(0) 讚！ | PPPD

The review process was very fast, not necessarily very professional. It is a journal with a lot of non-academic content, and I only submitted to meet a deadline. If you are not in a rush to publish, I do not recommend submitting to this journal, as the publication fee is quite expensive.

(0) 讚！ | 科研豆子

It's been almost twenty days since I submitted it, and it has been in the review status all along

(0) 讚！ | 楞德

I was rejected directly by the template, and I also submitted to the corresponding special issue. Plants are really popular

(0) 讚！ | Fang

I applied for plant phenotype analysis using image processing deep learning and got rejected three days later with a rejection template without knowing the reason, I'm devastated

(0) 讚！ | 认真搞

Why is it so difficult? I submitted a paper on diversity in agriculture and it was rejected because it didn't fit the scope. I then submitted a paper on plants, and it was also rejected for not fitting the template. There were no specific reasons given. The journal accepts even lower quality papers in a particular special issue, yet my paper was rejected? Can't you at least tell me what's wrong and what needs to be improved? When my submissions to other journals were rejected, the editors always provided detailed feedback on what was wrong and what needed to be corrected! It's frustrating. If I wasn't in a hurry, I would never submit under my own name again!

(0) 讚！ | 灌水老先生

Research on the different ripening stages of mulberries was conducted, which clearly fits the direction of the journal, and even the direction of a special issue of the journal, but the editor rejected it directly, blacklisting the journal

(0) 讚！ | Fang

The notebook is on the desk

(0) 讚！ | 孙希辉

Pay to get into District 2?

(0) 讚！ | SCI-maker

You can also

(1) 讚！ | 黄昏夕阳1983

It took a total of 3 months from submission to acceptance, and it was finally accepted after being reviewed by 7 professional reviewers. The improvement is significant, not as poor as originally imagined

(9) 讚！ | 超强大妹

2023.11.02 Submit

(0) 讚！ | ...

Hi, how long have you been feeling this way?

(0) 讚！ | 高

Is the Special Issue of this journal recognized domestically?

(0) 讚！ | 渡渡

Hello, OP. I want to ask about the chances of being rejected if the submission gets "ur" on the same day and remains unchanged for three weeks.

(0) 讚！ | 超强大妹

The review was conducted on the third day after submission, and on the 15th day, all review comments could be seen on the website. Two of the comments believed that the article was not good enough, and then the editor delayed making a decision. It was dragged on for over two weeks, and after I reminded them twice, they finally rejected the submission.

(0) 讚！ | xiahaijian

2023.5.26 - Submission;
2023.6.5 - Received feedback for revisions (2 copies, very fast), one reviewer had no comments; the second reviewer, who is an expert in the field, provided sharp but forward-thinking opinions, which gave us a good direction for our future research;
2023.6.6 - Received feedback from the third reviewer: no comments;
2023.6.12 - Revised manuscript (reviewer requested additional experiments), we did not conduct the experiments as it was explained that if we had to, we would change the journal. The explanation was reasonable;
2023.6.15 - Feedback received, all experts agreed to publish (the second reviewer was "impressed" by our explanation, which was indeed reasonable). The academic editor raised a small issue with a figure that needed modification, and it was returned the same day;
2023.6.20 - Accepted!
Overall, the editor was responsible, and the reviewers were professional. We truly encountered skilled individuals, and the questions were excellent; at that time, I really wanted to conduct the additional experiments! The process was fast! The quality of this journal seems to have improved over the past two years, the only drawback being how expensive it is!

(1) 讚！ | 番茄嘟嘟