Submitted on March 1st, Under review since March 24th

(0) 讚！ | chahahaha

Submitted on March 7th, the submission has been received up until now

(0) 讚！ | kdw

How long does it take to go from received status to the next stage?

(0) 讚！ | chahahaha

Personal feelings, the speed of peer review mainly depends on the Associate Editor (AE) and the reviewers, and cannot be generalized. However, in my case, the second round of review was minor revisions and it took 2-3 months to get the result

(1) 讚！ | 金3201

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and respectively titled as "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(0) 讚！ | 戏精在科研

The journal is quite good, the reviewers are professional, the first review took 4 months, the whole process took a year

(1) 讚！ | 金4573

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(0) 讚！ | 戏精在科研

Hello, are the requirements for 12 pages when submitting a manuscript mandatory? Can it be 14 pages? Thank you

(1) 讚！ | sousouyi

May I ask if the maximum page limit of 12 pages stated in the options for submitting to this journal is a strict requirement? Would it be acceptable to submit 14 pages for the first time?

(0) 讚！ | sousouyi

TCYB has no reputation abroad..

(0) 讚！ | Luvvv

Very normal, this journal is very good, but very slow...

(0) 讚！ | Luvvv

I would like to ask all the experts, I submitted it on the 5th, but it is still "received" on the 22nd. Is this normal?

(0) 讚！ | 学术界的小学生

It has been almost a year for me.

(0) 讚！ | 暮烟水

I have been pregnant for nine months.

(0) 讚！ | Analysis68

Submitted for six months and still under review, feeling desperate.

(0) 讚！ | CZ真真

Highly recognized journal within the control field. Impact factor and classification cannot fully explain the issue, personally, I feel that the quality of articles in this journal is much stronger than some top-tier relationship-based journals.

(21) 讚！ | Sunshine Boy

A very good journal.

(0) 讚！ | Sunshine Boy

This journal should be better than TCYB, SMCS, considering its low ranking. Also, is the JCR ranking Q1 or Q2? Because it shows Q2 on JCR.

(20) 讚！ | 12345abc

Some want to laugh. The first time I heard that not using a scholar means it's not legitimate... TAC and TCST both use this submission system, so does that mean TAC is also not legitimate?

(0) 讚！ | 公子小蒋

After revision, the paper will be directly accepted within three months. The opinions of the three reviewers are generally valuable and greatly help in improving the article. Overall, the process is faster than TAC (faster than the first review of TAC). Currently, it is classified as a Tier 3 journal, but some universities consider it as a Tier 1 publication, ranking it after Cybernetics and before TAC. Its international recognition is higher than Cybernetics.

(11) 讚！ | 蝉鸣夏至

Generally, translations can be submitted to scholars. This includes industries such as computer science. Perhaps for cost-saving purposes, the scholar system was not used. This is not important.
What is important is that the initial review at the editorial office took three months, and they said the direction was not appropriate. I am a bit drunk.

(0) 讚！ | s4425838

Because this is a control journal, the submission system used by the journals under IEEE CSS (Control Systems Society), including the top control journal TAC and the control-oriented applied journal CST, is the same. It is indeed strange to have a rejection from the editor for three months, perhaps encountering unhelpful Associate Editors and Associate Editors-in-Chief.

(0) 讚！ | 猫无忌

It feels very unprofessional that the journal Trans did not use the Scholar system. After submitting, no one processed it for 2 months, then it was under review for 7 days. Then it was in decision pending for a long 1 and a half months. When I urged them, they replied that the submission direction was not suitable for the journal and suggested that I submit to IEEE PES. Not to mention that the submission direction clearly includes power systems, it's just unbelievable that the editorial department held it for 3 months claiming it's not suitable. Electrical engineering journals usually have the first review result within three months. I dare not touch journals like this in the future, it's scary.

(0) 讚！ | s4425838

The reviewer cannot be chosen, it is chosen by the deputy editor Lacra Pavel.

(0) 讚！ | 猫无忌

Hello, may I ask who is the reviewer you have chosen? Can you please tell me?

(0) 讚！ | 小张同学要加油