If you see this situation, you can't see it in the submission system

(0) 讚！ | Coating

Around 15,000 Chinese Yuan

(0) 讚！ | 简简单单

May I ask how much the layout fee is?

(0) 讚！ | Serena_ZZZ

Submitted on 3.29, reviewed in two to three days
Revised on 4.25, with five reviewers and over 30 comments for major revisions
Final modifications submitted on 5.14
Accepted on 6.5

(3) 讚！ | 简简单单

Around half a month

(0) 讚！ | 聪明鼠

How long does the second review of VPP approximately take? Anxious

(0) 讚！ | never reject

Just keep the payment receipt and everything will be alright. If there is any issue, our team will reach out to you

(0) 讚！ | YBZJ

I would like to ask, after the article has been accepted, I paid the layout fee with Alipay and received a payment confirmation email, but the system still shows the fee as unpaid. Has anyone encountered this situation?

(0) 讚！ | 东

Rejection rate is over 90%, requiring significant innovation, but Singaporeans themselves get through. What's going on!
There are a lot of connections, very concerned about innovation, and it's difficult

(0) 讚！ | 老天师张之维

The specific date was not given, only advised to revise as soon as possible. I managed to complete the revision within a few days during the National Day holiday, as the issues raised by the last two reviewers were not critical and could be easily addressed. In the response letter, I objectively explained what my paper covered, what the innovative points were, and how they countered the comments from reviewer 1 (maintaining an objective tone, providing evidence without being overly assertive, and without emotional language

(0) 讚！ | 果汁果冻

Reviewer 1 did not provide specific comments, but simply stated that my article contains too many descriptive language and lacks depth. It is evident that the reviewer did not carefully review the article, as the feedback provided lacks detail and pertains to the discussions within the article

(0) 讚！ | 果汁果冻

Submitted on September 7, 2023. Received external review on the third day.
On September 30, received feedback from initial review with 3 reviewers. The first reviewer suggested direct rejection, the second reviewer had 6 comments, and the third reviewer had 11 comments. Some comments from the second and third reviewers overlapped, but all were objective and not fatal. Especially the third reviewer paid close attention and found a few careless mistakes in my text, which was embarrassing. Ultimately, made major revisions based on initial review comments.
Revised manuscript was returned on October 7, and on the same day, contacted the journal staff responsible for my article. I expressed my concerns about reviewer one (worried about their strong opinions) and thanked Ms. Shahana Parvin for managing my article patiently. She provided feedback to the editor-in-chief, who was also very accommodating and assigned an assistant editor to handle it. The assistant editor's handling process included checking all author information for deletion, ensuring blind review, and possibly involving a new reviewer. However, the assistant editor was a bit slow in processing. It took over two weeks for the manuscript to reach the editor-in-chief, who sent it for external review on the same day. After about a week, the external review returned with direct acceptance.
On November 7, received acceptance letter with no comments from new reviewer, agreeing that no modifications were required for publication.
Currently waiting for proofreading and payment before online publication.
Overall, the review process was reasonably fast, but the open access fee was a bit high. The journal's quality is good, with a high impact factor and good recognition. Thumbs up!

(0) 讚！ | 果汁果冻

In the past two years, I have submitted two articles and both have been rejected by the editors. The editors said that their rejection rate is over 90% and they only accept articles with significant innovations (although a recent manuscript with very poor quality was accepted). I later found out that this journal mostly favors connections, as most of the accepted articles are from their own network. So, please consider this before submitting your work!

(1) 讚！ | 2024一定毕业

11 July 2023 Manuscript Submitted
11 July 2023 With Journal Administrator
14 July 2023 With Editor
24 July 2023 Out for Review
31 July 2023 Decision Pending (major revision) 4 reviewers, 1 rejection, 2 major revisions, 1 minor revision, over 40 comments
Given 2 weeks for revisions, requested extension due to extensive revisions needed
01 September 2023 Manuscript Resubmitted
01 September 2023 With Journal Administrator
04 September 2023 With Editor
05 September 2023 Out for Review
06 September 2023 Decision Pending (Accepted

(1) 讚！ | yayiyayi2021

Additional fee: $2070 USD

(1) 讚！ | delll

2023.8.30 decision pending
2023.8.30 accepted
Due to the limited information available about this journal, I will provide a complete submission process based on my own experience for everyone. There were three rounds of review, with the first round taking three weeks, the second round taking two weeks, and the third round taking two weeks. It took exactly two and a half months from submission to acceptance. There were a total of four reviewers, and the review process was rigorous. Thumbs up!!

(0) 讚！ | delll

Feeling a little anxious, it's been 14 days since the third review with no response

(0) 讚！ | delll

Success is just around the corner, congratulations

(0) 讚！ | 激光加工鸭先知

2023.8.15 With Editor
2023.8.15 Out for Review

(0) 讚！ | delll

2023.8.11 With Journal Administrator

(0) 讚！ | delll

2023.8.11 Revised Manuscript Submitted

(0) 讚！ | delll

Revision required (minor) on August 10, 2023

(0) 讚！ | delll

2023.8.10 decision pending

(0) 讚！ | delll

2023.7.26 is under review.

(0) 讚！ | delll

2023.7.26 Out for review.

(0) 讚！ | delll