No change, a little slow

(0) 讚！ | Spike

How are you? What's going on now?

(0) 讚！ | 难搞啊

How do you know if it has been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 难搞啊

How is it going? Any updates?

(0) 讚！ | 难搞啊

How is it going? Has it been updated? I also changed to UC after voting

(0) 讚！ | 难搞啊

Has the middle time point changed, or has Uc always known that it was rejected?

(0) 讚！ | Spike

Urgently need to avoid pitfalls in the article. The editorial department is very slow in handling, and the article has been sitting in the editor's hands for a long time. It took a month for the editor to decide to reject the article without review

(1) 讚！ | zhangzhenhua

How many words? Scared

(0) 讚！ | Spike

5/17/2024: Submitted to Journal;
5/18/2024: Under Consideration;
5/19/2024: Under Consideration;
5/19/2024: Transfer Pending;
The review process was very fast, not sure if it's because the paper was too long. It went through one round of consideration but was quickly rejected

(0) 讚！ | xiaokeyanren

Received the second APMT, sharing submission experience
3.14 submit
3.16 under consideration
3.23 under consideration
4.8 under consideration
4.29 major revision
5.16 accept
The initial review process was a bit slow, with multiple rounds of editing and reviewing. However, once it was submitted, the review process was quick. The reviewers were efficient and nice, and their suggestions greatly improved the article. Hopefully the journal will soon return to being ranked 10 points and in the top tier!

(0) 讚！ | Till-I

Submitted on 5.14, the status changed to "under consideration" after more than an hour. Is this normal or was it rejected?

(0) 讚！ | Spike

I'm sorry, I raised my voice a bit

(0) 讚！ | 2333huan

Namjoon Cho handles manuscripts at a speed comparable to a koala

(0) 讚！ | Tali

2024.1.22 submission
2024.2.23 Received modifications from 3 reviewers, all are positive and professional, but there are a few questions that are difficult to answer.
2024.3.4 Returned for revisions
2024.3.13 Received email of formal acceptance, took over a month, both the editors and reviewers were quite prompt, the journal is friendly and will continue to submit in the future

(0) 讚！ | 准科学家

2.05 under consideration
2.09 under consideration
2.25 under consideration
Contacting customer service to inquire if it is still in the "with editor" status is quite unreasonable. I don't know why. Either review it or reject it. What does it mean to hold onto it without processing it? I suggest everyone not to submit to this journal, as it is too indecisive

(2) 讚！ | 2333huan

It took over two months from submission to receiving the rejection notice. The status changed twice from "under consideration." The reason for rejection was that they couldn't find reviewers. This is the first time I've encountered this type of journal. It's a waste of over two months. Beware, my friends!

(0) 讚！ | 撒盐少女

How is the status now? I have been waiting for over a month for my submission to be reviewed. Is it still under UC status?

(0) 讚！ | 撒盐少女

The journal review process is very fast. After the initial review, the reviewers provided many comments, which were overall very professional. It has significantly improved the quality

(2) 讚！ | 李文琪

Be patient and feel that the journal is very rigorous and not abundant

(0) 讚！ | 诗剑逍遥

How are you doing now? I have also been waiting for a month for my submission, and it is still under consideration

(0) 讚！ | 撒盐少女

Submitted on September 23
Received reviewer comments on October 18
Revised on November 8
Accepted on November 15
The journal process has been very efficient

(1) 讚！ | HH@123

Have there been any changes? Our submission timings are similar, but the other two papers submitted by the research group have already been reviewed, and there has been no response for this one

(0) 讚！ | LiDi

10.3 Continue to urge for submission, give another half a month, if there is no response, withdraw the submission directly by email

(0) 讚！ | 不忘初心+1

Submitted on October 4th, revised on November 3rd, take a chance, hoping to return to District 1 next year

(0) 讚！ | 5511

The submission was made on August 6th, and there were multiple changes in status with "under consideration". It was learned from the public account that 6 reviewers reviewed the manuscript, and the editor waited for all reviewers to provide their comments before giving a major revision deadline on September 29th, which allowed 20 days for revisions. All 6 reviewers recommended publication with some detailed comments on issues.
The decision was made to return on October 19th, and the next day it was under consideration again. Finally, on November 1st, the editor accepted the manuscript directly! Overall, it just took a bit of time for the first review, and the rest of the process went quite smoothly

(0) 讚！ | 上山的小白