X
    學術可視化工作室RC   登錄   提交文稿
學術英文編修

Physical Review Materials

期刊標題檢索 PHYS REV MATER 最新評論: My first innovative work during my Ph.D. focuses on the electronic st... (2024-02-28)


期刊名稱:   ISSN:   主題領域:   影響因子範圍: -
索引:   類別:   開放訪問:   排序方式:

[Physical Review Materials]您好,您是該頁面的第 110047 位訪客。

期刊簡介
期刊名稱Physical Review Materials Physical Review Materials
LetPub Score
6.3
50 ratings
Rate

Reputation
7.2

Influence
4.9

Speed
8.5

期刊簡稱PHYS REV MATER
ISSN2475-9953
h-indexN.A.
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.800.9320.896
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
Q114 / 81
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q2148 / 463

自引率 (2023-2024)6.50%自引率趨勢
掲載範囲
Physical Review Materials is a new broad-scope international journal for the multidisciplinary community engaged in research on materials. It is intended to fill a gap in the family of existing Physical Review journals that publish materials research. This field has grown rapidly in recent years and is increasingly being carried out in a way that transcends conventional subject boundaries. The journal was created to provide a common publication and reference source to the expanding community of physicists, materials scientists, chemists, engineers, and researchers in related disciplines that carry out high-quality original research in materials. It will share the same commitment to the high quality expected of all APS publications.
官方網站https://journals.aps.org/prmaterials/
在線稿件提交https://authors.aps.org/Submissions/login/new
開放訪問No
出版商American Physical Society
主題領域Physics and Astronomy
出版國/地區United States
發行頻率
創刊年0
每年文章數605每年文章數趨勢
黃金OA百分比11.01%
Web of Science 四分位
2023-2024
WOS Quartile: Q2

CategoryEditionJIF QuartileJIF RankingJIF Percentage
MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARYSCIEQ2208/438
索引 (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2475-9953%5BISSN%5D
平均審稿時間 *來自出版商的數據:
來自作者的數據:
競爭力 *來自作者的數據:
參考鏈接
相關期刊 【Physical Review Materials】CiteScore趨勢
自引率趨勢 每年文章數趨勢
作者評論
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。
  • 同一學科的期刊
  • CiteScore趨勢
  • 自引率趨勢
  • 每年文章數趨勢
  •  
    學科內的可信期刊 影響因子
    Living Reviews in RelativityH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 69.90
    QuantumH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 9.20
    NPJ MicrogravityH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 7.30
    Frontiers in Remote SensingH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 3.90
    SolidsH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 3.40
    OpticsH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 2.20
    Journal of Computational Physics: XH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 6.10
    Discrete and Continuous Models and Applied Computational ScienceH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 0.60
    Quantum ReportsH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 3.30
    Radio Physics and Radio AstronomyH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 0.60
    學科內最受檢索的期刊 頁面查看次數
    Quantum21690
    NPJ Microgravity19917
    Optics17371
    Living Reviews in Relativity16106
    Journal of Computational Physics: X5727
    Quantum Reports3884
    Radio Physics and Radio Astronomy1745
    Discrete and Continuous Models and Applied Computational Science1592
    Biofizicnij Visnik1363
    Frontiers in Remote Sensing1028
  •  

    Physical Review Materials Physical Review Materials
    明年預測:
    穩步上升 無變化 逐步下降  刷新
  •  

     
  •  

     


首頁    上一頁    1    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/1)
  [Physical Review Materials] 的評論撰寫評論
作者: Xiao-Yu Wang


領域: 材料科学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2024-02-28 09:03:46 評論於
My first innovative work during my Ph.D. focuses on the electronic structure of disordered materials at a research site. I have been rejected by npj computational materials and materials today physics, and now I am trying prm. I hope to have a good result
(1) 讚! | Xiao-Yu Wang

作者: John1234


領域: 物理与天体物理
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 直接被接受


撰寫評論

2024-01-06 20:41:58 評論於
It mainly depends on the partition. If PRM is placed in the physical category, it will be very good, although the materials are lacking, but the articles inside are not just about materials like the AM series
(0) 讚! | John1234

作者: orlando


領域: 物理与天体物理
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2023-03-30 08:04:28 評論於
Who can predict when I can advance to Zone 2?
(0) 讚! | orlando

作者: Automata


領域: 物理与天体物理
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2022-10-13 16:24:38 評論於
I have submitted twice. For my first article as a PhD student, I originally wanted to submit it to PRB (Physical Review B). However, my advisor informed me that PRB no longer accepts articles on traditional materials after 2017. So, I decided to submit it to PRM (Physical Review Materials). Surprisingly, it went smoothly and I can almost say it was a green light all the way.

However, the second submission was a bit frustrating. Although my work also involved traditional materials, it delved into deep physics and was in a very niche research area. As a result, the editor directly rejected it, and their response gave me the impression that they didn't understand it at all. So, I wrote a letter arguing my case, reluctantly went through the review process, and the reviewers didn't strongly recommend it but asked several questions and requested proper answers. As a result, the editor seized this opportunity and rejected it again without delay. Later, I looked up the personal information of the editor responsible for my article and found that their research area had nothing to do with mine. It seemed quite irresponsible.

During my PhD, I have read many articles in PRM, and overall I appreciate the quality of some articles published there. However, based on my two submission experiences, it seems that the editing standards at PRM can vary. Therefore, one should be cautious when submitting.
(2) 讚! | Automata

作者: 嚯嚯


領域: 物理与天体物理
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 拒稿


撰寫評論

2022-10-07 17:16:48 評論於
I have submitted several times in the PR series and have had a few articles published, but to be honest, the quality of PRM articles is much worse than PRB. It is said to be the recycling bin for PRB, so it should be more accurately positioned. However, it is not easy to just submit to PRB. The editors value innovative points, especially in cases where the article is assigned to Editor Wang, it is basically impossible to pass, but it is relatively smooth with other editors. So, I suggest avoiding a certain editor.
(2) 讚! | 嚯嚯

作者: Skyrmions


領域: 物理与天体物理
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-06-02 14:17:48 評論於
Positioned as a recycling bin for PRL and PRB.
(2) 讚! | Skyrmions

作者: Skyrmions


領域: 物理与天体物理
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-06-02 14:16:33 評論於
The PR series truly did not understand materials science well, and in recent years, it has been a typical example of investment failures.
(2) 讚! | Skyrmions

作者: qixi


領域: 物理
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2020-09-26 16:03:25 評論於
It was my first time to submit to Physical Review Materials. The process speed of the editor was very fast, and the questions raised by the reviewers were also to improve the article. It is a good submission experience.

(20) 讚! | qixi

作者: automan96


領域: 物理
審稿時間: 1.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2020-05-28 06:40:08 評論於
PRM is very efficient now. Submitted in early April, 3 reviewers were invited, 2 were very positive, but some minor issues needed to be corrected. Another reviewer seemed to give no reply, so the editor returned the review comments to us without waiting for the third one. It took us 2 weeks for making a minor revision, and then it got accepted directly after submission. I didn't expect it to be so efficient during the epidemic, and the whole process was very satisfying! By my calculation, the instant IF should become almost 3.6. Come on!

(19) 讚! | automan96

作者: JJKK


領域: 物理
審稿時間: 6.0 month(s)
結果: 修改後接受


撰寫評論

2020-02-03 21:04:58 評論於
After six months in Physical Review Applied, the editor suggested it to be transferred to PR Materials. Then it was accepted directly after about a week. This journal aims to the materials focusing on physical mechanism, and the impact factor should be lower than PR Applied and PRB. I feel that it aims to accept those articles partial to the physical mechanism that rejected by PRB, or those articles partial to the mechanism and application background that rejected by PR Applied, and the material-based articles. It should be that the PR series wants to follow other materials journals and expand its physics-oriented perspective to the entire materials science. The word of mouth and industry recognition should be under PRB and PR Applied.

(22) 讚! | JJKK

作者: QQQ


領域: 物理
審稿時間: 3.0 month(s)
結果: 直接被接受


撰寫評論

2018-11-18 15:42:08 評論於
My manuscript was eventually rejected by PRL after one year, and the editor suggested I switch to PR Materials. It was directly accepted after a week or so. The positioning of this journal should be a material biased physical mechanism, and the impact factor should be directly between PRB and PRL.

(6) 讚! | QQQ

首頁    上一頁    1    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/1)

開始撰寫 [Physical Review Materials] 的評論:





Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*