Submitted on March 1st, sent for external review, received the editorial comments at the end of May. The email included feedback from the editor-in-chief and two reviewers. Reviewer 1 mentioned that the article does not align with the scope of the journal, while Reviewer 2 only provided minor comments. The editor-in-chief decided to reject the submission based on their own judgment and Reviewer 1's suggestion. It's been quite a long wait of three months, but hopefully this information is helpful for others. It's frustrating how challenging it is to submit articles nowadays

(0) 讚！ | letpub_d

This magazine GeroScience can be quite frustrating, the page displays external review for a month, the interface date changes frequently, and a month later they tell me my article lacks novelty and does not qualify for review, so it was rejected. They played mind games with me for half a day, pretending to be editors, why didn't they tell me earlier that my article lacked novelty? Why did they use the term external review, and keep changing things, they were all deceiving me, it can be said that I was deceived, very irresponsible. Everyone should be cautious when submitting articles

(0) 讚！ | 耶达坎普

There is no reason

(0) 讚！ | Kevin Cui

May I ask the reason for your rejection?

(0) 讚！ | Vincent

7.26 Submission
7.28 Assign reviewers
8.1 Under review
8.15 Rejected by editor without review comments

(5) 讚！ | Kevin Cui

How are you doing? I have been a contributing editor for over a week and I am still an invited editor.

(0) 讚！ | Odsuperman

Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0
Sharing Experience: 22 years of the latest section y, a good journal, worth a try

(0) 讚！ | 西风嘉荣

There are fewer journals in the field of gerontology. Geroscience is the renamed version of Age, which is considered an established journal in this field. Overall, it is at the forefront of geriatric medicine. After the first submission, a response was received within two weeks, suggesting minor revisions. After three weeks of revision, the reviewers apologized for their oversight and requested further minor revisions. After making the necessary modifications, the revised manuscript was accepted three days after resubmission.

(5) 讚！ | handsomeddm