4.4Editor Assigned

4.4编辑分配

(0) 讚！ | rainballchao

3.30 minor 4.1submit

请问这是什么内容，需要翻译吗？

(0) 讚！ | rainballchao

3.20 minor revise
This time, only editorial suggestions were made to continue revising the abstract and article structure, without affecting the content. The requirement is to reduce the word count by 12%.

(0) 讚！ | rainballchao

Have you reminded them? Do you want me to remind them?

(0) 讚！ | sigma1

RC 3.18 has been assigned a reviewer as shown in ur 3.16.

(0) 讚！ | rainballchao

I have been doing RC for a month.

(0) 讚！ | cosbz

After the minor revisions, another round of review was conducted (the third round), and the reviewer was the same as before, very satisfied. After acceptance, there was a one-week delay because the previous editor and the production department's editor could not be reached. The lesson learned is to always pay attention and contact in a timely manner.

(0) 讚！ | xiaoxiaoqiang

The RC has not received any results yet since the end of February. May I ask how long it usually takes for the editors of this journal to make a decision?

(0) 讚！ | sigma1

Although the first trial provided feedback after 6 months, there are still second, third, and even fourth trials, taking a total of one and a half years!

(0) 讚！ | 唐糖糖9627

I submitted my manuscript for review a year and a half ago, and after the initial review, it went through two different editors. I received 24 suggestions for major revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 贪吃的锦鲤

It took me a year and a half to complete one round of review, and I was given major revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 贪吃的锦鲤

May I ask if the original poster has accepted it now? Will it be accepted directly after minor adjustments?

(0) 讚！ | superxuer

How is the progress now, OP? Did the minor adjustments lead to a direct hiring?

(0) 讚！ | superxuer

Before the Chinese New Year, on January 27th, it was finally accepted, taking a total of one and a half years. Those who are eager to graduate are not recommended to submit to this journal.

(0) 讚！ | 唐糖糖9627

Hello, I am in the same situation. May I ask if it is possible to check the progress of the review?

(0) 讚！ | 暗戳戳

2.20 Under review

(0) 讚！ | rainballchao

In the second round, we received minor revisions from the reviewers. After making the revisions, the editor also suggested some minor changes before accepting the manuscript. After resubmitting the revised manuscript, it went back under review for a few days before changing to "Reviewers Assigned." I'm not sure what's going on, maybe the reviewers have changed? The second round of reviews all said the revisions were satisfactory, just providing some suggestions on reference formatting. It's exhausting.

(0) 讚！ | rainballchao

It has been over a month since UR started turning into RA at the beginning of January. I want to send an email to ask, but I dare not. Have any of you experienced a similar situation with family members?

(0) 讚！ | 想毕业everyday

Slow as a snail, the reason is because we don't ask for review fees or layout fees, purely freeloading on journals, leading to an explosion in submissions. Additionally, after the recent rejection from Total Environment and ESPR, the number of submissions to this journal has doubled. Cherish each submission, as the one submitted in July 23 was accepted in February 25, with a total of 5 reviewers and three rounds of revisions. Each round of revision takes about four months, with sharp reviewer comments that essentially require the article to be rewritten. It is important to treat the reviewers seriously, as the quality of the article is significantly improved after revisions. Although it is slow, the editors are very responsible. Those in a hurry to graduate should not submit, but those who are not in a rush can. Freeloading is still the way to go.

(0) 讚！ | 波波公子

Slow as a snail, the reason being that there is no review fee or layout fee, purely freeloading on journals, leading to an explosion in submissions. Additionally, after the rejection of Total Environment and ESPR recently, the number of submissions to this journal has doubled. Cherish each submission, submitted in July 23 and accepted in February 25, with a total of 5 reviewers and three rounds of revisions. Each round of revision takes about four months, with sharp comments from the reviewers, basically requiring the article to be rewritten. It is important to treat the reviewers seriously, as the quality of the article is greatly improved after modification. Although it is slow, the editors are very responsible. Those in a hurry to graduate should not submit, but those who are not in a hurry can still submit, after all, freeloading is still good.

(0) 讚！ | 波波公子

Submitted on May 3, 2024, with three rounds of revisions in between, the first feedback was received two months after submission. The article was accepted on February 10, 2025.

(0) 讚！ | SummerN

My paper also completed the second round of revisions, and the feedback was very positive. I am considering acceptance, but only if the weight is reduced. However, after reducing the weight and resubmitting the manuscript, it has entered the RA status again, and it has been over a month. Can you please explain this situation?

(0) 讚！ | xiaoxiaoqiang

I also encountered a similar issue, have you contacted the editor? How did you solve it?

(0) 讚！ | xiaoxiaoqiang

I also went through two rounds of revisions, and the reviewers all said that the modifications were very good and acceptable. The chief editor also agreed to accept the changes after the revisions. When asked if there was anything else that needed to be changed, the response was only to decrease the similarity. After immediately making the necessary changes and submitting them, the paper was once again put into review.

(0) 讚！ | xiaoxiaoqiang

Is "reviewers assigned" an external review?

(0) 讚！ | ldaaa