1) Submission Received; the next day (Article Processing Charge Confirmation);
(2) one month (Minor Revisions); one week later (Accepted for Publication); the next day (Final Proofreading Before Publication); the same day (Paper has been published).
The overall speed was very fast, the reviewer's comments were pertinent, the questions raised were very targeted, and they greatly helped to improve the article

(0) 讚！ | Publish-maker

The pending view was rejected within three days. The content of the article had been reviewed multiple times by the supervisor and had a large workload, and the innovation was also good. However, the template was rejected after three days, I don't know what's going on with MDPI lately, they also rejected my submission to Remote Sensing a few days ago

(0) 讚！ | small master

Others are pretty quick, but it took me two and a half months to figure it out

(0) 讚！ | 洋洋洋

Why am I always inexplicably rejected? Other articles that are hastily written can be accepted, so why not mine?

(0) 讚！ | 论文小白想录用

How long does it usually take for pending review? And how likely is it to be rejected if it takes longer than a certain amount of time?

(0) 讚！ | 论文小白想录用

35 days

(0) 讚！ | SPECTER_YTR

Friend, did they reject it because it didn't follow the template?

(0) 讚！ | 布丁Alex

I'm back again, rejected, template, I am really...I'll try his Biology special issue

(0) 讚！ | 灌水老先生

Initially aimed for a quick submission, I submitted to the Diversity journal, but it was not within the scope. Subsequently, I made some changes and submitted to the agriculture journal, but the template rejected it... The content is definitely enough, I read two of his published papers and they are all watered down, both got published, but mine got rejected???? I am now trying his Plant journal, let's see how it goes

(0) 讚！ | 灌水老先生

Template rejection

(0) 讚！ | 肥猫

3.25 Submit
4.17 Major revision
4.22 Revised Version Received
4.23 Accepted for Publication
The processing speed is really fast, maybe because of the topic submitted. Hope the journal continues to develop steadily

(0) 讚！ | Haoyang Z

Last year's manuscript, add a comment.
This is the second Agronomy article done with students, not very innovative but the amount of work is pretty good. I feel confident that it will be accepted in the traditional third-tier journal. We first submitted to a second-tier journal and were rejected, the students were a bit anxious, so I happened to have a discount and submitted to Agronomy. The overall experience was better than last time, the speed was amazing, and while the opinions of the three reviewers were many, they were not too difficult.
In all honesty, I see a bright future for Agronomy. In the past six months, I have reviewed a lot of manuscripts for Agronomy, some of them are of high quality and close to industry-leading journals (by American scholars); but there are also some low-quality ones (by local researchers from small European countries), I know I couldn't reject them so I gave them a lot of feedback

(0) 讚！ | 欺言乐翁

Have you used the template? Was it rejected the same day? In what field?

(0) 讚！ | Haoyang Z

After submission, why would the editor reject the manuscript directly without sending it for peer review (template rejection)?

(0) 讚！ | yuzaifei

2024.4.4 Pending review
2024.4.5- Under review

(0) 讚！ | SPECTER_YTR

Is the journal under review already submitted?

(0) 讚！ | Haoyang Z

The person upstairs, which journal is your family running? The review period is only a little over a month, and you've already followed up three times. Some other non-open access journals may not even start reviewing within a month, and yet you dare to hurry three times. You are so bold. MDPI is thinking, if you didn't pay me, I would have rejected you long ago

(0) 讚！ | 小小小小小林

2023.9.5 submission
2023.9.14 Three reviewers' comments came back, two minor revisions and one major revision, the editor gave three days for minor revisions. Due to an interruption, it was delayed until 2023.9.18. After the return, there was a request to change the author's statement and the color of the figures. Finally accepted on 2023.9.22. Overall, it was quite fast

(0) 讚！ | R=A(1-Sin@)

How long have you been assigned an assistant editor?

(0) 讚！ | 野原旧之助

It has been three days for me, have you heard anything from yours?

(0) 讚！ | 野原旧之助

It has been three days since I heard from you. Have you got any news?

(0) 讚！ | 野原旧之助

I submitted a special issue, and it was accepted for publication

(0) 讚！ | niannian

How many days has your pending review been pending? Mine has been pending review for 5 days with no news yet. I'm getting a bit anxious. What should I do?

(0) 讚！ | 向大牛学习

How many days has your pending review been going on for? Mine has been pending review for 4 days now and I still haven't heard anything. Feeling a bit nervous, what should I do?

(0) 讚！ | 向大牛学习

It's a rare sight to see six reviewers for a paper, but it shows the professionalism of the process and doesn't feel superficial. The reviewers seem much more professional and meticulous compared to those of tier-3 journals

(8) 讚！ | 黄昏夕阳1983