A series of twists and turns. Submitted on 7.21, received external review results on 7.31. Three reviewers, with two providing mostly positive feedback and one more negative, but not major issues. Rejection with encouragement to resubmit. Resubmitted on 8.1, received email on 9.4 informing me that the original three reviewers did not continue with the review, and three new reviewers were assigned. Two reviewers gave positive evaluations, and Reviewer 2 raised some professional questions, but none were major issues, resulting in a request for major revision. Revised on 9.15, Reviewer 2 raised another set of questions on 9.18, requiring further revision on 9.19. During this time, the status showed "pending editor decision," and I received an email on 9.25 noon informing me of the final decision.

(0) 讚！ | 骑鱼过海的猫

The article has been quite a journey, it's really difficult to catch up during the summer vacation. Here is the submission diary:
6.13 submitted
6.14 under review
7.8 major revisions after the first review, all four reviewers gave positive feedback but also provided a lot of suggestions for modifications, 10 days were given for revisions
7.17 revised, during this time it was constantly pending editor decision, sent an email halfway through to urge for a response and was informed that the academic editor was on vacation
8.21 second review, minor revisions, all four reviewers accepted the changes, but the academic editor requested a major language revision
8.23 revised after polishing
8.27 finally accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 永远的cat

24.1.17 Submitted for review
24.1.24 Confirmed submission fee
24.2.26 First minor revision
24.2.27 Have co-authors sign submission
24.3.4 Submitted after minor revisions
24.3.6 Uploaded signed documents from co-authors

24.3.15 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Direct rejection

(0) 讚！ | ParadoxSin

MDPI's speed is still acceptable, compared to Animal Nutrition in China. Lately, I have been receiving review invitations from Animal Nutrition that are delayed by a few days. You have been dragging your feet in handling my manuscript, so why should I review for you? We are all in this together, so let's just delay together

(6) 讚！ | 拼多多

MDPI's journal turnaround is faster than Frontiers, but sometimes it can be frustrating. Previously submitted to Foods, two reviewers had no comments, but the editor rejected it, citing it did not fit the scope of the journal. You don't even follow your own external review process

(2) 讚！ | 噜啦噜啦嘞

The given text is already in English. It states the following information:

Received Date: 28th May 2023
Revised Date: 18th June 2023
Accepted Date: 20th June 2023
Submission to First Decision (Days): 22

(0) 讚！ | 浪漫的甩头男

The first SCI paper was published in three months, which is neither long nor short compared to Chinese journals. However, it is not as fast as the journals under MPI, as mentioned online. The main reason is that Reviewer A took one month to submit the review. Additionally, the time given to the authors for revisions was short, with 10 days for the first revision, 5 days for the second revision (which also required additional experiments), and 24 hours for the final proofreading. The reviewer's questions were detailed, providing suggestions on various aspects, including the proposed results and final conclusions, as well as language and experimental operation. The overall experience was good. The article was online three days after payment. That's about it.

(0) 讚！ | yjz1997

The speed is really fast. It was rejected on the third day after submission, which is much better than other magazines, especially some domestic ones that keep you hanging for seven to eight months before rejecting you.

(57) 讚！ | shenlinyong

A very good journal, covering poultry, monogastric, ruminant, special animals. Papers on nutrition and reproduction can be submitted to it. I was anxious to graduate. The first review opinion was received in 14 days after submission. After that, we revised it for four times. The reviewing was very strict, and it was accepted within one month. The manuscript was reviewed very quickly. If it is inappropriate, they would usually reply within one week. (Two senior female fellow apprentices had submitted to it before.) The impact factor becomes 2.3 after the 2020 update.

(1) 讚！ | danixiaodd

The manuscript was directly rejected on the third day after submission. Another submission in the morning from our laboratory was directly rejected in the afternoon. The email response received wea as follows: We are writing to inform you that we will not be able to process your submission further. Submissions sent for peer-review are selected on the basis of discipline, novelty and general significance, in addition to the usual criteria for publication in scholarly journals. Therefore, our decision is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your work." May I ask you what is the reason? What materials do you need to submit to Animals generally?

(2) 讚！ | 一叶任东流

A very good journal. I major in biomedical engineering. The research involved a lot of animal experiments, and I wrote an article and submitted it here. The first submission was at the end of September, and the review comments were given in about mid-October. The three reviewers were very serious and affirmed the innovativeness of the work, but they also provided a lot of comments, including supplementing data, so the editor rejected it and encouraged resubmitting. It was re-submitted in early December, and at the beginning of January, a major revision was required. One of the two experts accepted it and the other one asked some questions. After a week of revisions, it was re-submitted, then a minor revision was required, and then proofreading was completed. Finally, on January 25, which is the first day of Lunar New Year holiday, it was published. Overall, it was quite good. It should be a great opportunity to be accepted if you reply the reviewers' comments seriously. In addition, the editor is also great and efficient.

(2) 讚！ | newcomer

This is not included in SCI?

(2) 讚！ | 你大爷