I am the same, after fixing the format, there are new format problems in half a month

(0) 讚！ | 陈炜

Could you please provide an update on the current situation?

(2) 讚！ | dfkjbliu

Did the manuscript go from pending technical assessment to with editor on the same day? What type of paper is it?

(0) 讚！ | sisichen

Submitted manuscripts enter the technical evaluation phase after one week, and the technical evaluation lasts for a month, requiring format changes. After revisions are made, the manuscript goes through another round of technical evaluation, which has been more than a week with no response. This journal is exceptionally slow

(0) 讚！ | 扯皮的马仔

Technical assessment has been going on for 20 days, it's so slow

(0) 讚！ | sunnnnnnnnnn

How long does it take from the "with editor" status to submission?

(0) 讚！ | 小羊812

The manuscript was moved from Pending Technical Assessment to with editor on the same day, which was quite fast. Hopefully, it will be sent for review soon

(0) 讚！ | syyunkx

Is there a LaTeX template for this magazine format, or should I just use Word directly?

(0) 讚！ | hw900208

It is up to the editor to decide whether to submit it for review, regardless of the format

(0) 讚！ | Chrishow

When the submission status changes from Under Review to With Editor, does it mean that the technical review has been completed and moved on to the next step, or does it mean that the technical review is still being handled by the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 是五月呀

Does anyone know the official WeChat account that publishes articles from this magazine?

(1) 讚！ | 012012

Submitted in September, technical review for one month, modification of format.
The format was revised in October and then resubmitted.
In December, there was a major revision, with a total of 6 reviewers invited and 5 reviewers providing very constructive comments of high quality. All comments were addressed, experiments were added, and the paper was resubmitted.
Accepted in January.
Overall, the quality of this journal is very high, with high-level reviewers. Let's keep up the good work!

(10) 讚！ | 012012

The quality of this magazine is still acceptable, it truly lives up to its name!

(0) 讚！ | 012012

JAR not only is about to experience a big increase in IF, but also has entered a new realm, a cause for celebration, well deserved

(86) 讚！ | +和+

Add you as a friend to ask some questions, thank you

(0) 讚！ | Chrishow

Technical review does not mean passing the editing stage. It is possible that the manuscript will undergo technical review for a month, editorial review for six months, then another month of review after revisions before it is accepted

(0) 讚！ | ggyyg

Could you please tell me if the Pending Technical Assessment will still be rejected after three weeks of modification?

(0) 讚！ | Chrishow

The initial editing process took a long time, but the later process was quite quick. It was sent to at least 14 reviewers, with 7 accepted, one accepted with minor revisions, one rejected, and one requiring major revisions. It went through two rounds of revisions before finally being accepted. It was quite a challenging process. It was initially aimed at an NC level, so it's a bit disappointing that it didn't quite reach that level

(0) 讚！ | 清水伊甸

Submitted one article in the early stage, rejected within a week.
Currently in the second week of submission, undergoing technical review.
Additionally, I helped review one article for them. In the system, I could see there were 7 experts. I asked challenging questions, but they responded well and directly approved it. A few days ago, the editorial department sent an email saying that this article has been accepted

(0) 讚！ | niuren

Technical review has been going on for a month, and I have been asked to revise the format twice during this period. Will this situation be submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | mo-1019

The early-stage editor worked relatively slowly, sending out to at least 14 reviewers, receiving 5 responses, one acceptance, one rejection, 3 revisions, and the editor requested major revisions

(0) 讚！ | 清水伊甸

The current instant IF of comprehensive journals are as follows: Small NC (8.7), SA (6.9), JAR (6.7), PNAS (5.4), Research (4.5), and everything else is below 3.5.

Brothers, let's go for it this year and increase our citations, to catch up with SA. The self-citation rate of JAR is too low, not even 1%, it's almost unethical to publish

(4) 讚！ | +和+

Submitted on June 12, 23. After approximately half a month of back and forth for formatting revisions, received the first review on July 19 with three reviewers. Revised on August 8 and accepted on August 30. Despite one reviewer still having some opinions after the revision, the editor decided to accept it. The process was quite fast overall

(0) 讚！ | JARE

Excuse me, when will this magazine be available in District 1?

(4) 讚！ | yangdong

With the editor, it takes about 3 days to review, and it may vary in different fields.

(0) 讚！ | 鱼游天下