I discussed the content of how to solve a problem a little more, which felt more in line with the direction of the BR, so I gave it a try. Submitted in early March, revised in early June, reviewed by three reviewers in total by the end of June, then sent back to the two previous reviewers, accepted by the end of September. Overall, it went smoothly, but the process was quite long. The reviewers were highly professional and provided a lot of comments, but their requests were not unreasonable, and they were able to pinpoint the key issues. There were high language requirements, so careful editing was necessary

(2) 讚！ | 许许多年

Submission date: August 5, 2023
Rejection date: August 28, 2023
Reason: The research problem is too specific

(0) 讚！ | 大鹏

Received an email from the editor-in-chief requesting submission before review? Or has the status of the manuscript changed to Under Review?

(0) 讚！ | 大鹏

The text is less than 8000 characters.

(0) 讚！ | daeaevevae

May I ask how many words you were initially asked to cut when editing?

(0) 讚！ | 痕痕

Submission in March, initial review after two weeks, it was considered that the length was too long, and it was suggested to streamline the text.
Submission in mid-April, review sent after two weeks.
Mid to late June, received initial review comments from two reviewers, major revisions required.
Early August, received the manuscript for minor revisions.
Mid-October, received second review comments from the third reviewer, minor revisions required.
Late October, received the revised manuscript for further revisions.
Early November, final draft ready, preparing for publication-related matters.
Total time: 8-9 months.
Overall, the journal's editors and reviewers are very professional, and their questions and suggestions are in line with my research content. There were no unreasonable demands. The external review process took between one and a half to two months each time, which is relatively slow.

(10) 讚！ | daeaevevae