I'm just asking, do you think everyone else is a dog like you, kneeling and licking Chem?!

(1) 讚！ | 薛定谔猫

You are disgusting, can't even stand the comments below and still have the face to come and submit articles, only to be rejected after submission

(0) 讚！ | xuxiaomingabc

I suggest switching to another platform that same night, with a posting frequency of 200 articles a year... it's just too difficult

(0) 讚！ | 大王叫我来巡山

Submitted on 2.6, with editor on 2.7, keeping track of it, wishing for good luck

(1) 讚！ | 大王叫我来巡山

Overall it's not bad

(0) 讚！ | jensenjiu

What is the review time for this journal? How long does it usually take to receive acceptance? Probably over a year

(1) 讚！ | 薛定谔猫

Kutabuta oyoyoyoyo

(2) 讚！ | jensenjiu

Thank you for the detailed sharing. The engagement factor of this publication is quite high

(0) 讚！ | 笑忘书老师

Can you stop bragging? It's not even close to being on par with Nature Chemistry. The quality of the articles in there is far inferior to JACS or Angew, and not even comparable to Nature Communications, at least in the field of organic chemistry. The visibility, impact, and recognition in applying for young talent or distinguished scientists are all lower than the previous three journals

(0) 讚！ | 薛定谔猫

It's a pity, but considering time constraints, I have decided to switch to reception. The quality of the articles on Chem Catalysis looks quite good, and I am optimistic about it. It should be worth investing in

(0) 讚！ | mpjiang

Is it not possible to argue? What a pity. The level of Chem Catalysis may reach that of ACS Catalysis in the future

(0) 讚！ | dataiyang

Chem submission process:
3/2/2023 under review
5/22/2023 all review completed
5/24/2023 major revision
7/3/2023 submitted revised manuscript r1
7/5/2023 under review
8/10/2023 major revision
8/28/2023 submitted revised manuscript r2
10/11/2023 Unfortunately, reviewer 1 still does not agree, suggest transfer to Chem Catalysis.

10/11 Chem Catalysis accepted directly

(0) 讚！ | mpjiang

Submission Process:
Received: October 10, 2022
Revised: February 19, 2023
Accepted: March 20, 2023
Published: April 19, 2023

In terms of electrocatalysis, overall, it went quite smoothly, and the reviewers were very professional. This work took more than two years to be considered by Science and Nature, but later my supervisor directly submitted it to Chem along with the review comments and the article. Let's keep up the good work!!

(16) 讚！ | 无敌小猪猪

What is the format modification for?

(0) 讚！ | langman

Editorial suggestion to transfer to Chem Catalysis, I checked and found out that it is a sub-journal of Chem. I am unsure about its quality and whether it is suitable to transfer to.

(5) 讚！ | dataiyang

"Submit JACS angew tragedy Chem minor revision"

(10) 讚！ | xusiyu

Stop bragging, it is far superior to JACS or ANGEW. Chem is not on par with JACS or ANGEW. As far as I know, many chemistry, especially organic chemistry, research groups publish in Chem because they couldn't make it to JACS or ANGEW. Chem's impact factor and recognition are significantly lower than JACS or ANGEW. When it comes to selecting outstanding young scientists, apart from Science, Nature, and its subsidiaries, JACS or ANGEW are the top choices, and Chem is considered less prestigious.

(0) 讚！ | 薛定谔猫

Received 27 August 2020, 
Revised 26 November 2020, (Three cycles for Revision)
Accepted 3 June 2021, 
Available online 29 June 2021.

Overall, Chem is much more demanding than our previous articles such as JACS, ANGEWANDTE, Nat. Commun., both in terms of data and innovation requirements. Although our article went through a major revision and two minor revisions, and the three reviewers raised many questions, we have made significant improvements to the article by addressing these questions and modifying it accordingly. With an impact factor of 22.908, it is already close to Nat. Chem. Chem, keep up the good work, and if we have good research in the future, we will definitely submit again.

(471) 讚！ | chemwt

2019/10/31 submitted to journal; 2019/11/01 with editor; 2019/11/6 under review; 2019/12/11 major revision (Major revisions were given by all authors); 2020/01/04 the revised manuscript (R1) was submitted; 2020/02/18 major revision (one of the reviewers raised a lot of questions). Due to the COVID-19, I postponed the manuscript for two months. 2020/05/30 the second revised manuscript (R2) was submitted; 2020/06/19 pre-accepted. I needed to modify the format; 2020/06/24 formally accepted, prepared to proof. A particularly good journal. The reviewers seemed to be a knowledgeable authority. The quality of the article has improved a lot after the revision. The editor was very friendly and efficient, and the entire major revision process accompanied by the epidemic, which challenged my personal mentality, but the efforts were not wasted. In 2020 IF is 19.75. I hope it rushes to more than 20 next year as Nature Chemistry. Come on!

(50) 讚！ | jmppp

19/02/18, submission; 19/03/12, rejected. Three reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision, and one rejection; 19/05/11, resubmitted after revision, many mechanism experiments and simulations were supplemented; 19/05/30, major revision. Two of the previous three reviewers accepted it, the third one continued to reject the manuscript; the fourth reviewer arbitrated and requested to make major revision; 19/06/13, revision was submitted; 19/06/19, accepted. The comments of reviewers were very constructive. The rejection reason given by the one who rejected the manuscript was also very reasonable.

(38) 讚！ | 安乃近

It's too hard!

(7) 讚！ | 15577625478@qq.com