期刊簡介 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems LetPub Score 6.2
53 ratings
Rate
Reputation 6.9 Influence 5.3 Speed 6.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | IEEE T COGN DEV SYST | |||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 2379-8920 | |||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 2379-8939 | |||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 12.00%自引率趨勢 | |||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=7274989 | |||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tcds-ieee | |||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | |||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | Computer Science | |||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | |||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 191每年文章數趨勢 | |||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 7.57% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| |||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | |||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2379-8920%5BISSN%5D | |||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: | |||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: | |||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: 我来也啊 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-24 16:03:21 評論於 The quality of the peer review is not very good. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 只想bi业 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-28 01:41:20 評論於 Can I ask everyone, what is the situation with the previously rejected and resubmitted article awaiting the editor-in-chief's decision on 27th February 2025, with both "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and "Awaiting AE Recommendation" statuses coexisting on 28th February 2025? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Ljingting 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-19 11:15:53 評論於 Sure, thank you very much! ![]() ![]() |
作者: AdFiFi 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-14 14:16:17 評論於 It will soon be preprinted and available online, followed by back-and-forth interaction with editors to make layout modifications, and then payment. I preprinted in February and will be officially published in August. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Ljingting 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-12 22:57:23 評論於 Hello, may I ask how long it will be online after accepting? ![]() ![]() |
作者: pkw2009 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-09 11:03:24 評論於 This journal is just a piece of shit. If you are not a connection, you will be humiliated by the editor. Yes, it's blatant humiliation. They leave the paper under review for four or five months without any response. Then they provide a few extremely poor quality review comments that could be written in 10 minutes. And then they reject the paper. And the most disgusting part is that after rejecting the paper, they encourage you to resubmit, and the whole process repeats again. I have been humiliated in this way three times. You may ask why I allow myself to be humiliated like this. It's because the corresponding author is a bit crazy and keeps asking me to resubmit. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Hello_world 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-19 13:01:41 評論於 Hello, have you received the AE's feedback now? I have been waiting for the AE's feedback for almost a month. ![]() ![]() |
作者: yy512 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 8.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-13 22:53:30 評論於 Return from major overhaul on 10-31 Accepted on 12-12 The suggestions are very good. The overall speed is faster compared to the Trans series. Hopefully, this publication will continue to improve. ![]() ![]() |
作者: yy512 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-29 11:38:51 評論於 8-28 - Major Revision ![]() ![]() |
作者: yy512 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-29 11:37:42 評論於 8-28 Major Revision. ![]() ![]() |
作者: z 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-21 15:30:34 評論於 The speed is too slow, I suspect AE is just dragging its feet, too slow. The review scores have been back for many days, but they are still stuck at AE. I really regret submitting to this terrible journal, wasting half a year of my time. lj journal is waiting to go out of business. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 我是春节快乐 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-18 13:55:51 評論於 Where can I see the review status? ![]() ![]() |
作者: AdFiFi 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-08 15:04:22 評論於 The decoding direction of cognitive signals, the top of 15 pages, although the published version is 18 pages. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 只想bi业 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-07 18:08:38 評論於 The more I think about it, the more angry I get. Let's take a good look at the abstract of Reviewer 1. I cited a paper A as the main comparison in my paper, and the experiments were conducted on the dataset used in paper A. However, Reviewer 1 did not look at the references I cited, but instead found another paper B with a similar method abbreviation to paper A. They then said, "I did not find any results like yours in paper B," and questioned where my results on these datasets came from. It really made my blood pressure rise. Where did this reviewer come from??? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 只想bi业 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-06 18:41:28 評論於 On 2024-10-06, reject & resubmit One reviewer seems to lack understanding in the field, raising two questions. The first one is quite naive, while the second one points out an experiment from a reference and questions why it was not conducted in the dataset, requesting additional experiment and details. The other reviewer is more lenient, only asking for some additional descriptive details. The AE's suggestion is to reject & resubmit, which was directly followed by the editor-in-chief. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 只想bi业 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-02 00:12:09 評論於 While waiting for the editor-in-chief's decision, the process is moving so quickly that I am probably going to be rejected. ![]() ![]() |
作者: kuaizhongbaa 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-01 14:04:11 評論於 Classmate, how are you doing now? I am currently awaiting a recommendation, but the date has not changed. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 只想bi业 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-29 18:36:27 評論於 Hello, may I ask what direction you submitted to TCDS and how many pages was your initial draft? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 只想bi业 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-29 03:15:25 評論於 Awaiting EIC Decision on September 29, 2024. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 我来也啊 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-27 21:01:02 評論於 Hello classmate, I would like to ask why my submission has been in the "Under Review" status since September 20th. What is the situation? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 只想bi业 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-27 19:54:41 評論於 2024-08-24 提交 2024-08-30 等待审阅评分 2024-09-27 等待AE建议 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 只想bi业 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-27 18:56:38 評論於 Hello, are you still in the "awaiting ae recommendation" status? I came from the "awaiting reviews score" status and it's only been a month since I submitted my application, it seems a bit too quick. Was I rejected directly? ? ![]() ![]() |
作者: yy512 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-08-16 13:12:12 評論於 8-16 Awaiting AE Recommendation Please wait for AE recommendation. ![]() ![]() |
作者: asdfx 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-08-13 13:50:44 評論於 Trash journal. The first submission was reviewed 4 times, each time making revisions as requested. In the last round of review, it seems like they changed the reviewer and took 3 months to directly question if all AI papers are just hyperparameter tuning. Regardless of whether the reviewer is an idiot or not, changing the reviewer after so many rounds of review, making all previous revisions pointless, is just stupid. Then, for the second submission, it seems they changed the reviewer again and directly rejected it. Idiotic journal, dragging on for over a year, back to square one, all the previous meticulous revisions were in vain. And the processing speed is especially slow. ![]() ![]() |
作者: yy512 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-19 14:27:10 評論於 7-19 Awaiting reviewer scores. ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us