First submission: 2023.2.15
Major revision: 2023.9.23
Rejection and resubmission: 2024.6.3
The handling by the journal's AE is too slow. And they added 2 more reviewers for the second round of review

(0) 讚！ | lichao951

My first review took about over 3 months, mainly because the wait for the editor to make a decision was quite long. I think the editor may be checking the system at fixed intervals

(0) 讚！ | EleaM Josen Haplacg

It has been more than a week and still awaiting admin processing

(0) 讚！ | 快快审稿

It took a month to receive a major revision. I procrastinated for a month and a half before sending a reminder email for the revision. It was accepted two weeks later

(1) 讚！ | AdFiFi

May I ask how long it usually takes for the first review? It has been two months and I still haven't heard any news. I can't find the email address of the journal either. Could you please share the contact information? Thank you so much!!!

(0) 讚！ | 太阳和月亮

Got the news of being hired in mid-February

(0) 讚！ | EleaM Josen Haplacg

Brother, what is the current outcome?

(0) 讚！ | 归零，开始

This journal sucks

(0) 讚！ | 归零，开始

The rubbish journal kept me waiting for a year and a half, with two major revisions and one minor revision, only to end up rejected. They are really a scam

(0) 讚！ | 亦冷

May-2023 Submitted
Sep-2023 Reject & Resubmit
The questions are not very sharp, and some are about additional experiments. Most of them are about issues in the paper, which are relatively easy to deal with.
Oct-18-2023-Present Resubmit &&

(0) 讚！ | EleaM Josen Haplacg

The review cycle of Trans has become longer because there are too many articles submitted

(0) 讚！ | pcjack

The text translates to: "Submitted in November 2022, still waiting for allocation, a trash journal."

(0) 讚！ | Ailuo

Giant pit, only those who invest know, it is just dragging you along, what kind of division has such temperament.

(1) 讚！ | 妈妈咪呀

Is there a letter now?

(0) 讚！ | 只会PDD

There is no...

(0) 讚！ | 快乐的科研人

The current status is still in the first trial. It has been over four months. I have sent several reminder emails, but it is still in the first trial.

(0) 讚！ | 只会PDD

Dude, have you sent the reminder letter for the 11-month investment? I have already waited for four months now.

(0) 讚！ | 只会PDD

My evaluation is that those who want to become famous can submit to this journal.

(0) 讚！ | Double Tin

I really can't believe it. There is only one reviewer for the review process, and this reviewer rejects the submission by simply stating that it doesn't fit the journal's theme. Is it up to the reviewer to decide whether it fits the journal's theme or not?

(1) 讚！ | Double Tin

I also work on SNN (Spiking Neural Networks), and I want to invest, but I am a little worried after hearing you say it's slow.

(0) 讚！ | grance

It has been 11 months since submission, and the first review has not yet returned.

(0) 讚！ | 快乐的科研人

Is there any submission direction for SNN? It has been almost two months since submission and it is still in the status of "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment".

(0) 讚！ | 墨雪迎燕

Submitted in October 2022, rejected in January 2023, wrote three comments and suggested resubmission. So, following the comments, made revisions for one month and resubmitted in early March. However, it was directly rejected in mid-May, with the reason being not innovative enough. It's really frustrating. The first time, they clearly stated that the experiment was insufficient, and then after dragging it for seven months, they dismissed it with just one sentence. It feels like all the efforts of one year have been in vain. I suggest not to seek reviewers within China, as Chinese people really look down on their fellow countrymen!

(1) 讚！ | gkgo

Submitted for two and a half months, still waiting for assignment of reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | lichao951

Now this journal seems to have a weak sense of responsibility. It was not like this before. Now, after submitting a manuscript, it takes several months or even half a year to a year for review, and the phenomenon of delaying the review process is common. Reviewers do not read the articles properly and give random rejection comments, and frequently provide malicious review comments that are below undergraduate level. There are also occurrences of associate editors intentionally finding faults with newly added reviewers. Furthermore, there is no possibility for appeal in this journal. Both the editor-in-chief and associate editors maintain a silent state.

Perhaps this journal will improve in the future. In any case, I hope that this journal will develop in a positive direction in the future.

(2) 讚！ | 客观公正