Returned for minor revisions after 2 months, both reviewers agreed to publish, but just one day after returning the revised manuscript based on expert advice, it was instantly rejected without being sent to the reviewers. The reason given by the editor was that the topic did not match! Even though it was sent for review and revised, how could the topic still not match! Why didn't they mention the topic mismatch at the beginning and waste over two months?!

(0) 讚！ | Han19

This journal is really slow, but getting published is still worth it. My first independently completed article. Rejected multiple times in the beginning, took a year and a half of submitting and rejections from about 20 journals, with various revisions and edits. It was painful, but ultimately accepted by a national journal.

Submitted in July 2023, external review started three weeks later.
Major revisions in October 2023, two reviewers with one major and one minor revision, took two months for revisions.
Submitted on November 5, 2023, external review three weeks later.
Minor revisions on December 12, 2023, one acceptance and one minor revision.
Returned for revisions on December 15, 2023.
Minor revision for formatting on January 10, 2024.
Accepted on January 16, 2024.
Proofreading on February 20, 2024, and then continuous proofreading.
Currently waiting for online publication.
Fee structure: black and white page 300, color up to five pages 1100, over five pages 600, editing fee 800, postage fee 80

(0) 讚！ | 吆喝喝

Have you got any results yet, 23rd July Accept, 8,22 Online, still waiting

(0) 讚！ | kindly

I wrote the paper on the homeland, the processing speed of the manuscript is okay, but the publication schedule of the bimonthly is too slow

(0) 讚！ | 喜欢跨栏の公广乐怡

A quite pleasant submission experience, except for waiting three months for the reviewing expert.
17-March-2023 submitted
07-Jun-2023 major revision
13-Jun-2023 revision submitted
24-Jul-2023 minor revision
29-Jul-2023 revision submitted
02-Aug-2023 accept

(1) 讚！ | kindly

The journal is fast in terms of speed, but the publication process is slightly slow.
06-Jul-2022 Submitted
05-Aug-2022 Minor Revision
02-Sep-2022 Revision submitted
26-Sep-2022 Minor Revision
02-Oct-2022 Revision submitted
12-Oct-2022 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 喜欢跨栏の公广乐怡

We co-authored the article with a foreign expert. Unexpectedly, one of the reviewers put forward many meaningful suggestions, including some regarding to grammatical issues. The reviewers were really serious, although it took 2 months to finish the review. It depends on luck. It is very good if you encountered a serious reviewer. Another reviewer is a peer in the wide field. He asked a very critical question. Other minor issues were not mentioned. It is estimated that it will be remained in Q3 for a long time. It’s quite good.

(1) 讚！ | venihall

A very junk journal. It's been more than a year and it hasn't been retrieved for a long time, and it happened that I lost a lot of rewards because of this article. I called the editor to inquiry, but the attitude was not good. Many papers accepted later than me have been retrieved. I can guess the reason why without thinking about it. I will never submit to it again in my life!!!!

(6) 讚！ | 大学磨平青春

The latest issue of Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition) can be retrieved on the web of sciences. My first SCI manuscript was submitted to this journal. The associated editor was very responsible and gave me a lot of comments. Thank him very much. As the first paper submitted to a SCI journal, it is very commemorative. Thumb-up.

(20) 讚！ | 小风

20180227 Submitted20180506 Partial review20180525 Resend to reviewers after revise20180605 Paper accepted

(1) 讚！ | Love you

This is a Chinese journal. My manuscript was in review for three months. Finally, I received a very unfair rejection letter.

(4) 讚！ | kuanchankancha