The top player from district one is gradually falling behind, and now there are no top players left in district two.

(0) 讚！ | 求Accpet

Is it necessary to rework if the partition has been separated?

(0) 讚！ | bilinbilin

The last time it dropped out of the top, this time it went straight to the second district.

(0) 讚！ | in_process

Top disappeared?

(0) 讚！ | 求Accpet

2024/11/18 submit
2024/11/25 under review
2024/12/12 review complete
2024/12/13 major revise
2024/12/23 submit
2025/1/18 under review 
2024/2/10 review complete
2024/2/12 minor revise
2024/2/16 submit
2024/2/18 under review
2024/2/25 review complete
2024/3/4   accept

(0) 讚！ | guo--!

Classmate, what direction are you heading in? Congratulations!

(0) 讚！ | little_r

What happened later?

(0) 讚！ | little_r

Brother, what's the situation going forward?

(0) 讚！ | little_r

Are you renovating? How is it going now?

(0) 讚！ | little_r

How are you doing now, brother?

(0) 讚！ | little_r

10.29 Summit
11.1 With editor
11.6 Under review

(0) 讚！ | 姜橙子蜜粥

2024.10.31 submit to journal
2024.11.3 with editor

(0) 讚！ | 祝好运

The main journals in the field of collective intelligence are quite limited, I guess only Swarm and TEVC. The latter is highly recognized in the industry. Swarm is also very good, but its visibility is very low outside the evolutionary computing community. Swarm publishes about 100-200 papers per year, possibly slightly more this year. Other journals are more comprehensive, such as TCYB, INS, KBS, ESWA, etc., with a publication volume of several thousand. To be honest, Swarm's focus on collective intelligence and its high impact factor indicate its significance. If you plan to research collective intelligence in the long term, Swarm has a high level of recognition. If you are considering other directions, it might be better to publish in comprehensive journals like TETCI and KBS, which have a higher reputation. It feels a bit like choosing a university – if you are unsure about the future, it's better to choose a local university, and if in doubt, choose one with a higher reputation.

(0) 讚！ | 熊熊

Yes, TEVC does, but TCYB and TETCI are not considered collective intelligence, right? They only collect collective intelligence. How is the recognition of this journal within the industry?

(2) 讚！ | 小白菜

In terms of quality, AISWEI is better than Ins, KBS, ESWA, but still not comparable to TEVC and TCYB. It should be similar to TETCI at the moment.

(0) 讚！ | 熊熊

Is this journal considered a top journal in the field of artificial intelligence? Or is it ranked as second or third? Would it be considered a sub-top journal?

(2) 讚！ | 小白菜

It took RRC about a month and a half, after sending a reminder email, they responded the next day. There were 5 reviewers and a total of 44 comments, including questions about methods and suggestions for additional experiments.

(0) 讚！ | hongcherry

They play by themselves, within the scope. The submission instructions mention the acceptance of cluster algorithm submissions, but the rejection reason is that cluster algorithm submissions are not accepted. It is not recommended to submit if you are not an industry leader.

(0) 讚！ | shaoshao0633

Why are you so funny? Is multi-target JSP meaningless? I'm anxious to see what meaningful work you are doing. Share it with us! Let's see what meaningful work you are doing. A link would be helpful.

(0) 讚！ | 00

Don't you want to pay attention to open source? Look at your Github, really? Are you getting impatient?

(0) 讚！ | Stevens

No problem, water two more posts, high level, high level.

(0) 讚！ | Stevens

Yes, haven't you always wanted to study your masterpiece? Is there no more follow-up? Has the code been open-sourced? Just run and tap on the keyboard, speak out, and keep learning.

(0) 讚！ | Stevens

Care? Hahaha, look at you, so pitiful. Stop being sour and go pay attention to open source. Share your meaningful work.

(0) 讚！ | 00

Please translate the following paragraph into English: -------

(0) 讚！ | 00

Please translate the following paragraph into English: ----

(0) 讚！ | 00