Are the reviews of the two pre-review experts clearly written on the official website? I've never heard of this before

(0) 讚！ | 中科院岳麓山实验室院长

When submitting, please ask two experts for a quick pre-review before considering whether to formally submit for review. The editorial department of Science Bulletin is currently paying too much attention to the potential citation frequency of each paper (i.e. the editorial department is currently too concerned about the impact factor of the journal, such as whether the original citation frequency of the corresponding author of the paper is high, and whether the H-index is high). Manuscripts with low potential citation frequencies may not be considered directly, regardless of their innovativeness or significant impact.
In fact, using the impact factor to evaluate a journal is too one-sided. Magazines that receive more submissions in popular directions such as energy and batteries are likely to see a rapid increase in their impact factor, such as Science Bulletin, which currently feels that most of the articles it receives are related to batteries and hot materials (possibly to enhance the impact factor of the journal). As a comprehensive journal, even if Science Bulletin only focuses on achieving a high impact factor, I personally feel that the international recognition of this journal as a comprehensive journal may be difficult to achieve even with a high impact factor. Whether the articles in the journal are well-researched or not ultimately depends on judgments from peer readers. Some journals have a low impact factor simply because they cover unpopular topics, but the work they publish is quite systematic and technically sound

(1) 讚！ | 小小666

I want to ask if the second revision is about formatting, did the editor ask you to change the language? My second revision editor sent a template to change the language, but I haven't heard anything back after ten days

(0) 讚！ | wscx

Cannot be regarded as a top publication. Not even qualified for a regular double-one district. Just a platform for networking

(0) 讚！ | 左张

This journal is abbreviated as sb. This abbreviation is very appropriate. Don't talk about top journals, even the level of ordinary double zone one is not there. It's just a platform for self-entertainment

(0) 讚！ | 左张

Does anyone know how long it will take for the revised language issues to be accepted after four reviewers in the second review all agree to accept it? Do we have to wait for the English editor to proofread it? Other journals usually accept submissions first and then proofread them. It feels like this process is reversed

(0) 讚！ | wscx

Your rating of this journal, submission results, submission cycle, submission experience, and other information reflect your dissatisfaction with the journal

(0) 讚！ | kgyd

To tell the truth, after changing the name to English, the reputation is not as good as it was with the previous Science Bulletin

(1) 讚！ | fission Yeast

It's better for scientists to stay away from domestic magazines like SB, which brings negative opinions from others

(1) 讚！ | fission Yeast

One primary review had three reviewers, all minor revisions, and the editor suggested minor revisions.
Surprisingly, for the second review, it was sent to a new reviewer, whose feedback was more extensive than all three reviewers in the first review combined, and the editor suggested minor revisions.
My head is still spinning now

(0) 讚！ | 中科院岳麓山实验室院长

You don't like your own way of doing things, and you can't stand it when others do things differently. It's just sick

(0) 讚！ | 碧海星空

Then don't comment if you have nothing intelligent to say

(0) 讚！ | 碧海星空

The first issue of the universe magazine made me laugh out loud

(0) 讚！ | 无敌大混子

The current impact factor of this journal is only 14. I feel like it's going to drop this year

(0) 讚！ | 中科院岳麓山实验室院长

This year, I graduated with a PhD and started looking for a job. I found that no institution really considers this journal as a top-tier one; at most, it is considered a regular Q1 journal. I suggest that if the quality of your manuscript is good, you should try submitting it to traditional and well-known journals first. Only consider submitting to this journal if you can't get accepted elsewhere

(2) 讚！ | 科研民工

May I ask how long it took for the stage of "Under Review"?

(0) 讚！ | fengfeng05

This journal currently has a problem where the quality of articles varies greatly, with some being very good and others difficult to praise

(1) 讚！ | 沙枣树与纯净水

2023.11.24 Submitted
2023.12.18 Major Revision
2024.01.16 Revised
2024.01.30 Minor Revision
2024.02.04 Revised
2024.02.05 Accepted
There were a total of four reviewers, all of whom raised professional questions. The editorial handling was also efficient

(5) 讚！ | nichengLetpub

After all, SB is just a pure visual relationship

(1) 讚！ | 首龚

How does this journal determine whether to send it for review? It has been under review

(0) 讚！ | 太空人

Give a chance for the development of domestic journals. It doesn't matter which journal you read, but the quality does

(66) 讚！ | 别忘了最初的你~

You are talking nonsense

(3) 讚！ | 天才123

You are talking nonsense

(2) 讚！ | 天才123

The article on sb is hard to understand and impossible to read. It is not recognized abroad and considered a joke even in private in the country

(226) 讚！ | 首龚

I guess even if these two so-called reviewing experts are tied together, their level is probably not as high as that of an amateur editor from a foreign top journal, right?

(0) 讚！ | 首龚