How about it, has the appeal been made, what is the result?

(0) 讚！ | zwndys

请提供待翻译的文本。

(0) 讚！ | 材料化学资深分析师

I submitted my application on August 26th, and it's already September 18th. It's been stuck on "Awaiting Admin Processing" the whole time, it's killing me!

(0) 讚！ | ucaswei

After being rejected multiple times by journals such as Nature and Science, I was advised by a friend to submit to NSR (a journal I was not familiar with and was not invited to submit to). It is said that the journal has very strict academic standards and a low acceptance rate (the journal is highly positioned and has stringent academic standards - it is said that even some national talents who are acquainted with the journal's editors/deputy editors and are familiar with them on a regular basis have had their submissions rejected without being reviewed, even after several submissions). After submission, there were also many rejections (it is said that some submissions were rejected after review by three reviewers: two with positive comments and one with negative comments). 

The first round of review took approximately 2-3 months, and the questions and suggestions from the three reviewers were all very detailed, professional, and challenging. During the major revision, a significant amount of additional experiments and experimental evidence were conducted in response to the reviewers' doubts and questions, resulting in a response of nearly 50 pages and some experimental demonstration videos. 

After acceptance, the journal requested revisions to the figures four times (vector graphics, with modifications to size, format, font, font size, style, layout, etc.), with strict requirements. It is said that during the publication process, the publishing editor will review the manuscript three times, ensuring rigorous quality control. 

In terms of academic standards, the journal seems to be quite rigorous and fair.

(1) 讚！ | 小小666

Is there any difference in the positioning and article orientation between National Science Review and Science Bulletin? Which one is better now?

(0) 讚！ | kingkingred

Are foreign journals devoid of human sentiments? Don't criticize blindly; the articles are actually quite good. Give national journals some time

(1) 讚！ | protect

Researchers should have a sense of awe, submitting to Nature is great, no need to insist on NSR [dog head

(1) 讚！ | Barryreno

I submitted my paper to Nature for review first and was about to receive it for minor revisions. Suddenly, I thought that in order to support the development of domestic journals, especially with the support of my fellow countrymen, NSR will definitely surpass Nature and beat Science in the future. Therefore, I immediately rejected Nature's request for publication of my article and switched to submitting to NSR

(13) 讚！ | 科研民工

If your manuscript is rejected after being submitted to a legitimate journal, and you decide to submit it directly to this NSR, you are just a joke, haha

(0) 讚！ | 科研民工

Dare to Submit to Mainstream Publications - Not Just for the Experts

(0) 讚！ | Yuzhihua

Awaiting admin processing for over two months

(1) 讚！ | 阿尔伯特R

Submitted on 18th October 2023. It has been a week and there is no news. The future prospects for the journal are bright, but the processing speed is indeed a bit slow. It seems that the phenomenon of manuscript waiting is quite serious recently

(11) 讚！ | King Baum

After reading your comment, I couldn't help but laugh out loud, hahaha

(0) 讚！ | penguin

Hello, may I ask how many days have you been waiting after that? ?️

(0) 讚！ | RyanXXX

After being rejected by Nature Science, I submitted to NSR

(4) 讚！ | 刘院士

You can try using appeal, which has a very high editing efficiency

(0) 讚！ | R星出品

29/06/2023 submit
03/07/2023 under review
01/08/2023 Review comments received, one positive and one negative. Editor rejected.
I don't know if I should appeal or not.

(0) 讚！ | BLUEBO

2022.12.14 Submission
2023.02.24 Major revision
2023.05.06 Minor revision
2023.05.12 Accepted

After being rejected by Nature and Science, the article was submitted to NSR. The research was conducted abroad, and there are no influential domestic experts in the author list. The editor was very enthusiastic and diligent, and the reviewer's comments were very fair and helpful, greatly assisting the work. I hope NSR continues to improve and succeed!

(1) 讚！ | 铁锭行

One week after submission, it was under review, and after more than 20 days, it changed to "Awaiting Decision". It has been "Awaiting Decision" for a week now, and I am anxiously waiting. Is this when the Decision Letter is being written?

Another strange thing is that my article is at the intersection of medicine and information, but the assigned editor is not from biology or information science, but from chemistry. I'm not sure if it's because they have too many manuscripts recently.

(0) 讚！ | Dantalion

After being rejected by the regular review process, I discussed with my boss and directly submitted to NSR. From submission to acceptance, the whole process took less than 4 months. The efficiency of NSR's editors is very high (it's not a prestigious group, so as long as the article quality is sufficient, there is no problem). Currently, the article quality of NSR is quite high, and the journal's scale and international influence need to be further expanded. Best wishes!

(1) 讚！ | 一支榴莲

The reviewers are very diligent and careful, and they will raise many key questions.

(0) 讚！ | ghostoneone

2022.12.08 submit & awaiting admin processing
2023.02.05 major revision
2023.03.26 submit revision
2023.04.07 minor Revision
2023.04.16 submit revision
2023.04.19 accept

NSR's positioning is second only to Nature and Science among sub-journals, covering almost all fields! It is said that the submission rate is less than 20%, as long as the work has a certain degree of originality or innovation, it will be considered for submission. The editorial efficiency is very high, and we look forward to further expanding its influence.

(81) 讚！ | BBY-

The timeline for submission has been carefully reviewed. It can be said that the efficiency of NSR editors is quite high. The comments from the first review were very professional and recognized the work. Of course, there were also sharp questions in the review comments, so a lot of experiments and theories were added. NSR has a high positioning, and there are many groundbreaking and record-breaking works in it, expecting further expansion of influence. We are all highly educated researchers and should not be sour grapes. Objectively speaking, as long as the work is sufficiently in place, the editors will definitely give it serious consideration.

(336) 讚！ | R星出品

2022.6.20 submit
2022.8.22 major revision
2022.10.05 revision submit
2022.10.26 major revision
2022.11.17 revision submit
2022.12.09 accept

Submitted on June 20th, 2022
Major revision on August 22nd, 2022
Revision submitted on October 5th, 2022
Major revision on October 26th, 2022
Revision submitted on November 17th, 2022
Accepted on December 9th, 2022

Changed from AM to NSR, the journal is good, but I hope NSR will adopt double-blind review to reduce familiar reviewers and further improve the quality of articles.

(327) 讚！ | 期刊试金石

Does changing the submission status from ADM to Under review mean that it has been sent for external review? Or does it still need to go through the editor's selection process?

(0) 讚！ | 铁锭行