2024.6.13 Submit/ Under Review
2024.6.17 Under Review

(1) 讚！ | zhouxiaoyucoco

No matter the quality of this journal article, one thing is for certain, you can't escape office politics!

(0) 讚！ | 后面没有路可走

Submission is accepted after two rounds of revisions. The actual situation of my manuscript is from an unknown ceramic group in China. I submitted to this journal for the first time just to give it a try. It was reviewed within a week by 7 reviewers who provided 74 comments. I added a lot of experiments and replied with several pages of explanations. The editor did not reject the manuscript because of its lack of fame. I personally think that the reviewers were very rigorous and meticulous, which significantly improved the overall quality of the manuscript. My personal opinions may not be correct, so please take them with a grain of salt

(2) 讚！ | tianyazhuimeng

Don't submit if you're not in the group, friends! Even if it's not 16, even if it's 160, it depends on defense. It's losing face for our countrymen

(15) 讚！ | impromptuC

You didn't see a bunch of kids surrounding Gong Lao Gui and flattering him in Moments, that's the real disgusting, all those who can get the favor are sycophants

(188) 讚！ | 王晓飞

What is the APC of this journal, why can't I find it now?

(0) 讚！ | 月色太美

Normally, the impact factor of the operation goes, and the quality of the manuscript above is not high

(0) 讚！ | 一枚科研小渣渣

Don't be surprised, there are specific groups, sometimes you have to make calls. A lot of garbage even above are not worthy of the fourth district

(0) 讚！ | 憨憨的小王

Domestic journals, understand a little

(0) 讚！ | abaflu1

Several catalytic papers above, with very few data, were directly accepted. The work I did myself had much more abundant data, but after submitting, they said the direction was not consistent...

(0) 讚！ | 我爱吃泡芙

Just listen to his opinion. I have already sought professional help to polish it, but he still said my English is too poor. It may not be excellent, but it's not that bad either. Besides, should we focus on the content of the article or the English itself? I have never been questioned about my English when submitting my work.

(0) 讚！ | 追光1

Comparing European and Chinese ceramics is much more difficult. No matter how innovative or systematic your work is, it all depends on the chief editor's decision. They either reject your submission by claiming that your language is not good enough, or your formatting is not acceptable, or your introduction is not up to the mark, or your abstract is inadequate. In short, there are always reasons for rejection. However, looking at the articles they have already published, they are just average. A few people around me have submitted and been rejected, but then they submitted to European and Chinese journals, and their papers were accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 追光1

At that time, I submitted the manuscript, but the editor was not satisfied with the introduction. After carefully rewriting it and resubmitting, it still didn't meet the editor's requirements and was rejected. Then I directly submitted it to Euroceramics, and Euroceramics accepted it after making minor revisions. Therefore, the ranking of this journal is definitely higher than Euroceramics.

(31) 讚！ | 追光1

It is completely self-indulgence among insiders. I didn't win when I invested in this (journal) back then, but I definitely succeeded when I switched to Ceramic International. The reason for rejection was a formatting issue in the early stages, which is really laughable. At that time, my supervisor was even a member of the editorial board, constantly urging everyone in the group to cite articles from this journal. However, the way they treated manuscripts was still the same, unbelievable!!!

(106) 讚！ | 祎祎

It's all about having connections. Even if you don't have any connections, your application will still be rejected. It won't be sent for review.

(0) 讚！ | Till-I

Raising the price of a European pottery by one yuan a year, it's okay to invest cautiously.

(94) 讚！ | 小小苏苏

It is suggested not to invest if it has no relevance, as it would be a waste of time!

(47) 讚！ | 你好321

Moved to SCIOpen

(1) 讚！ | Trifles

May I ask why there is no "submit" option in the submission system?

(0) 讚！ | X22

Does anyone know why there is no "submit" option in the submission system? Are there any other submission URLs available?

(1) 讚！ | X22

The editing process is very fast, and it is reviewed on the same day. There were five reviewers who raised a lot of questions. After the revisions were submitted, the re-review and acceptance were quickly done.
Hoping for continuous improvement.

(620) 讚！ | Trifles

Instant IF 15.8, the new IF in June will definitely surpass 16. This journal is rising so quickly, it may become even harder to invest in the future.

(0) 讚！ | 拉粑粑小魔仙

The impact factor is increasing at an extremely fast pace.

(29) 讚！ | zzzzz11

For those who work on ceramic energy storage, others have published a lot of papers with slightly higher density. I thought my own results (above 6) would be several times better than theirs, and also not inferior to articles in other reputable journals (lead-free). I initially planned to submit to this journal because its impact factor has been increasing and it may develop even better in the future. However, later I realized that I was wrong. Although the editors are also involved in ceramics, it seems that the results of the paper are not important to them. Only people who have a connection with them will have their papers reviewed (I heard this from other industry insiders). They said you need to send a separate email to the editor, and even if you do, there is no guarantee that it will be reviewed. They believe that only those who have a potential future relationship with them will be reviewed.

(159) 讚！ | 依依归来

It's completely a journal run by insiders. The low number of published articles easily allows the editorial board to manipulate the impact factor. Each editor has a quota of how many times their articles should be cited in a year. Now that the impact factor has exceeded ten, it's really a joke for ceramics journals. After surpassing ten, it becomes difficult for outsiders to have their papers reviewed, but papers with poor quality from the journal's editors can still be reviewed, and they even specifically invite reviewers recommended by the editors. I often receive review invitations from this journal, where the author is one of the editors. This is enough to show that it's a game played by insiders. Domestic journals shouldn't be run like this. The responsible executive editor for initial review should be replaced, and I will no longer cite papers from this journal unless absolutely necessary.

(821) 讚！ | 李力