The article has been accepted after 9 months, with minor revisions taking 4 months in the first round of review, and acceptance in the second round after 5 months. Although the overall process took a long time, the final result is very satisfying

(0) 讚！ | duduwa

Rejected after submission, submitted on the 3rd and rejected on the 8th. I feel that the quality of my paper is good and my supervisor has also reviewed it. I personally feel that this journal has high standards for paper quality

(0) 讚！ | _sunny_

It has been three months in peer review, and I haven't received any response yet. I can't even see the information of the reviewers. Could it be that I made a mistake when submitting the manuscript? The interface is as shown in the picture. Could someone kindly answer my question?

(0) 讚！ | zhou

The feedback has arrived

(0) 讚！ | Xi Yi

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them ":" and ":"

(0) 讚！ | 科研-婷婷

Hello, may I ask if this is for single-column submissions?

(0) 讚！ | 进击的

Once you are hired, you don't need to worry about the school's review. Just wait for a while and it will be fine. When you reach this point, you can just submit it. After I accepted it, it took about 20 days to review, but it doesn't really matter once it's accepted, so don't worry

(0) 讚！ | AaronPaul

OP. How long does it take to receive the proof after accepting it?

(0) 讚！ | mj11

Classmate, I am now 9 months pregnant, and there has been no movement. Have you reminded the submission halfway through? I am too anxious, please reply, thank you!

(0) 讚！ | duduwa

The process of submitting a paper took ten months, going through major revisions, minor revisions, submissions, and each time it took about three months to receive the results. It is really hard to predict the time. As for the reviewers encountered, it's all about luck. Among the three reviewers, two of them should be top experts in the field, and their suggestions are brief and incisive, making me nervous and always afraid that even after making changes, the paper will still be rejected. It is really torturous. Another reviewer is more meticulous, listing more than ten points including grammar errors, clarity of figures, parameter tuning process for the comparison method, adding charts to highlight significance, etc. It feels like they are teaching you how to improve step by step, very responsible. Only when I received the acceptance did I relax. Now, submitting papers is becoming more and more difficult. I hope this can reduce some anxiety for those who are currently submitting papers. Let's encourage each other!

(0) 讚！ | AaronPaul

Classmate, I am in the same situation as you, waiting for a decision. I don't know what's going on. Can we communicate about the situation?

(0) 讚！ | duduwa

Four reviewers, 2 minor revisions, 1 major revision, and one reviewer who is not at all related to the research topic randomly reviewed the paper, directly stating that the paper has no innovative ideas and giving a reply that clearly shows they are not familiar with this research topic. In this situation, it feels like luck plays a significant role in this journal, and it is managed by Indians, so the academic atmosphere can be imagined. Be cautious

(0) 讚！ | wdx_05

However, the corresponding author has not received the review progress email, so it should not have been sent for review yet. In addition, the status of my paper is "your submission has passed technical checks" one day after submission, and it has not changed for two months

(0) 讚！ | Xi Yi

All the reviewers' comments have been received. Now it's up to the editors to make a decision. However, it's been nearly three months since the decision was made and there is still no result. I have to admit that the reviewers were quick in giving feedback, but the editorial decision seems a bit out of line

(0) 讚！ | wdx_05

It's been almost two months since submitting, but it still shows "Your submission has passed technical checks: The editors' decision can take several weeks as they may consult peer reviewers." Does it mean the editor has not been assigned yet?

(0) 讚！ | Xi Yi

How do I know how many reviewers have been invited?

(0) 讚！ | fandroid

Strongly not recommended to submit to this journal, it is garbage among garbage, mainly for the following reasons:
(1) The comments of the first reviewer were returned two months ago, and there is still no news of the first review until now. The review period for reviewers is two months, and the editor's decision for the first review takes three months. It feels like the time of the submitter is not time.
(2) Using a Google account to log in to the new system of this journal, and after logging in, there is a hyperlink to contact the editor. After clicking on this hyperlink, there is no function. You cannot contact your editor through the hyperlink. If you want to inquire about the status of your manuscript through the email that succeeded in submitting, no one will ever reply after sending the email. I sent three times and never received a reply. Here is the situation of my submission:
November 19 - Submitted
November 20 - Passed technical review and waiting for editor assignment
November 28 - Peer review
January 31 - No first review result has been returned so far

(1) 讚！ | wdx_05

Have you got the results now? How long has it been?

(0) 讚！ | duduwa

Hello, how long has it been since you submitted your Dip? Do you think it's useful to remind the editor?

(0) 讚！ | Accept!!!

How long have you been dipping for?

(0) 讚！ | Accept!!!

Senior brother-invested, it took a whole 10 months to succeed

(0) 讚！ | nihao233

It has been 3 months, always peer review, how do I know if it has been sent for external review?

(1) 讚！ | 白开水

The speed is ridiculously slow. I'm speechless. It's been four months without submission, and still waiting to be assigned to an editor

(0) 讚！ | wcymbnl

Hello, how many reviewers have been invited to review?

(0) 讚！ | 小蜗111

Submitted, now 8 reviewers reviewing. Worried about rejection, very nerve-wracking

(0) 讚！ | 粉丝建行卡老师