It's been two and a half months since my revision was sent back, and it's still with the editor

(0) 讚！ | Paranoia*

It's really really slow, it's been a month since it was returned for revision and it's still with the editor

(0) 讚！ | Wang Thiago

I was hired nearly five months ago, and now I'm supposed to submit the raw data to the public database! I've been trying to access the system for the past few days, but why can't I log in? It shows "page not found" and I can't see the articles I submitted before! What's going on??? It seems like the submission system has been recently updated

(0) 讚！ | 德云小生

How long does it usually take to receive feedback after submitting a contribution? It's been over a month since my picture was reviewed and it still hasn't reached the editors. I am curious about the timeline moving forward

(0) 讚！ | 拐拐拐子

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: not bad

(0) 讚！ | 销魂怡冉

I am really impressed, I will definitely not graduate in time, my editor-in-chief is Kevin Tyler, this person is really slow, sometimes I really want to go to Twitter to criticize him

(0) 讚！ | Wang Thiago

The revisions have been sent back with a request for an author statement explaining the reasons for the changes. However, it has been a month now and there has been no response from the editor

(0) 讚！ | Paranoia*

It's been 10 days after I sent it back for revisions and it's still showing as "with editor." The editor also mentioned they want a clean version after the revisions, but there's no option for a clean version on the system, only a version with revisions. How did you fill it out?

(0) 讚！ | Wang Thiago

2024.5.10, there is no response from the editor yet, and the revised version has not been sent for second review

(0) 讚！ | Paranoia*

After rework, it has been one month and it is still under external audit. It has been four months since it was submitted. It's really slow!

(1) 讚！ | 德云小生

The review process is a bit slow, but the quality of the articles is high, and the review comments are very valuable

(1) 讚！ | 逢投必中小修保佑

2024.3.21 revise

(1) 讚！ | Paranoia*

Submitted a review, waiting for review results, not sure about the review cycle and difficulty

(0) 讚！ | Paranoia*

I submitted my article in August and it is still under review

(0) 讚！ | 逢投必中小修保佑

I just submitted a paper in January, and now it's with the editor. I wonder how it will turn out

(4) 讚！ | 德云小生

Not bad, it's worth a try

(0) 讚！ | 第一深情

How is this journal? Is it included in the first division of the Chinese Academy of Sciences? Is it reputable?

(2) 讚！ | MightyJ

You don't need to submit the original w b picture. I remember I didn't submit it at that time

(0) 讚！ | 惠泽君

Hi brothers, this magazine requires data submission. I have cropped some WB original images, now only cropped small images are left. Can I submit the small images instead of the original ones? Or can I not submit them at all?

(0) 讚！ | 南风梦秋

Does this magazine require submission of data, including the WB chart? I have cropped my WB chart to only the cropped small image, is it acceptable to submit like this?

(0) 讚！ | 南风梦秋

Oops, for convenience, my coauthor has provided fake email addresses. Do we need to change that?

(0) 讚！ | 冬菱姑娘

How long does the first trial take? Is the whole process lengthy?

(0) 讚！ | 风满青燕

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasized research direction: Pathogenic microorganisms; virulence factors
Experience sharing: Went through a complete review process, felt the review was very rigorous and meticulous, the writing level requirements were very high, very optimistic about the future growth of this journal

(0) 讚！ | 碧水希振

Accuracy: The abstract should accurately reflect the purpose and content of the paper; Independence: The abstract should stand alone, so explanations should be given for special terms, all abbreviations (excluding units of measurement), and omissions; Conciseness and specificity: Each sentence in the abstract should provide maximum information and be as concise as possible; Tense and voice: The abstract generally uses present and simple past tenses, and passive voice is often used to describe facts

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Different types: descriptive, informative, and structured. Descriptive abstracts are commonly used in social sciences and humanities, providing general information about the research without specific details about the methodology and conclusions. Informative abstracts are typical in scientific papers, presenting details about the research background, objectives, methods, results, and conclusions. Structured abstracts are information-centered and often consist of a series of headings (such as: research objectives, methods, results, conclusions), mainly used in medical papers and clinical trial reports

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德