Dude, which editor are you using? Why are you so slow?

(0) 讚！ | 潜水划水喝水

The track link in the wx public account is updated with the events of the previous day, around 6:10 am every day. Therefore, it may be slow. After submission, the track email sent by the editorial department is updated in real time.

(0) 讚！ | 学术卡拉米

Can I ask if it is okay to ignore the issue of exceeding 100 references when submitting the paper, and just fill in 100 references directly? In fact, there are already more than 110 references. Can requirements for charts and other similar elements also be ignored?

(0) 讚！ | 荔枝seed

Additionally, it seems that each editor of this magazine has a different style, and people I know have been influenced by the editor's opinions, but I have not. Also, the track system is a bit delayed. Even after the required review is completed, it still shows as under review. It only reminds me to update after receiving acceptance feedback. Furthermore, for review articles, it is essential to have a high standing and broad coverage. If there is a certain accumulation and profound understanding in the field of the main subject, it should be fine.

(0) 讚！ | accept接到手软

6.18 submission
7.15 Major revisions, with a total of four reviewers, one of whom had very sharp comments.
Around 8.17, revisions were completed and the magazine was uploaded.
9.13 Minor revisions were made after the major revisions were sent to four reviewers, but it seems that only 2 of them completed the review. A few days later, the tracking system showed that the editor suddenly invited 14 reviewers, but after waiting for a week, no one accepted the review. Suddenly, an email regarding the minor revisions was received, with comments only from one reviewer.
9.17 Minor revisions were completed and uploaded.
9.19 Under review, the editor also sent it to 2 reviewers.
9.30 Review completed, with comments from only 1 reviewer.
10.2 Received acceptance email.

(0) 讚！ | accept接到手软

How are you now, OP? You encountered the same problem, inviting 14 reviewers for the first time and eventually giving up. I wonder how it will turn out this time.

(0) 讚！ | accept接到手软

Is this your first time? But for a retake? I feel like there might still be a possibility of receiving further invitations.

(0) 讚！ | accept接到手软

According to the Track system, there are a total of two experts reviewing the manuscript, and currently, the review comments from both experts have been submitted. However, the status has not changed and still shows "Under Review". The Editor has not invited any additional reviewers. Is this situation normal?

(0) 讚！ | pingya

The first round was given a major revision, and after returning, two people completed the review. However, only one opinion was received. The editor made a small revision, and after the second round of returns, the editor gave it to two more people. Did the first return not receive any opinions from one person? Because 14 people were invited halfway through, it all ended in nothing, and only one opinion was directly sent to me. I am a little worried.

(0) 讚！ | accept接到手软

In the author's guidelines, it is noted that journals should not exceed 100 references. The initial draft can be trimmed to below 100 references, and additional references can be added during the later revision stages.

(0) 讚！ | 是小杨先生

Dude, you are so fast, good luck!

(0) 讚！ | Xiang95

I would like to ask everyone for advice. The author's guide of this journal does not restrict the number of references, but the submission system requires no more than 100 references. However, I have noticed that many recently published articles have more than 100 references. How do they manage to do this? Do they simply ignore this requirement when submitting? I hope experienced seniors can offer some guidance on this matter. Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | Sicons

Original poster update, article accepted
Submitted 3.23
With editor 3.24
Under review 3.29
Review complete 5.10
Major revision 5.14
Re-submit 6.4
With editor 6.6
Under review 6.13
Review complete 6.20
Minor revision 6.22
Re-submit 6.24
With editor 6.25
Under review 6.28
Review complete 7.16
Re-submit 7.24
With editor 7.25
Accepted 7.27

(0) 讚！ | Jiaoxiniao

Just resubmit after making the changes, worst case scenario is that it will be rejected again. Anyway, if you submit to another journal, you will have to make the modifications according to the current feedback. Try more, more opportunities.

(1) 讚！ | 科研顺利-accept

Two reviewers have made their decision, one with minor revisions and the other with a rejection. The editor did not say that it cannot be resubmitted, so I would like to ask if it can be resubmitted after making the necessary changes.

(0) 讚！ | lijfya

Normally, if it is a self-built account making a submission, the relevant information can only be found in the account of the corresponding author after the submission is completed.

(0) 讚！ | 帅的脚趾疼

It has been approximately 6-7 days since my application is under review.

(0) 讚！ | accept接到手软

The system should be updating.

(0) 讚！ | Eiland

After completing the submission information, it was transferred to the corresponding author for submission. I received a confirmation email from the author, but there is no status in the system, all showing as 0. I cannot see the status of the manuscript. Does anyone know what's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 投必中中中

It's been three and a half months without any progress. Oh my, I have four reviewers who have accepted, but three have not provided feedback yet.

(3) 讚！ | accept接到手软

AugensternNN, how long does your submit last?

(0) 讚！ | Eiland

This is my first submission. I would like to know how long it usually takes from "Submitted to Journal" to "under review"?

(0) 讚！ | Eiland

Have you had all four reviewers accept the invitation? I have been unable to find a second reviewer to review.

(0) 讚！ | 星空

Just a routine response. I recommended a reviewer to the editor, but there hasn't been any news yet.

(0) 讚！ | 星空

Starry sky, how did you return after urging me to leave?

(0) 讚！ | lijfya