期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LetPub Score 9.2 51 ratings
Rate
Reputation 9.7 Influence 8.9 Speed 8.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | TRENDS FOOD SCI TECH | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0924-2244 | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1879-3053 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 162 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 2.60%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/trends-in-food-science-and-technology/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/TIFS | ||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Elsevier Ltd | ||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 不定期刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 1990 | ||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 307每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 13.73% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0924-2244%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 1.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: About 50% | ||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: 小飞猫 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-31 15:38:43 評論於 3.27 submit 3.28 with editor 3.29 under review Invited 8, 0 accepted. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Beyond Everything 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-26 13:47:28 評論於 Do I need to contact the editor in advance before submitting an article to this magazine? ![]() ![]() |
作者: Beyond Everything 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-26 13:43:00 評論於 Do you need to make a reservation in advance for this journal? ![]() ![]() |
作者: lllkkk2529 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-09 19:42:41 評論於 Has anyone encountered a situation where their submission was already under review, but suddenly, for no apparent reason, it was inexplicably rejected without any feedback from the reviewers? ![]() ![]() |
作者: dddddd1212 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-14 17:01:34 評論於 The word limit is 10,000 words, but the manuscript is around 11,000 words. Is it a big problem? ![]() ![]() |
作者: JTZ01 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-12 21:21:14 評論於 When I submitted, the document count was 115, but I filled in 100 in the system. The editor sent it for review the next day without asking about this issue. Many documents retrieved from web searches have more than 100. Perhaps this is not as strict as the abstract card. This is just my personal situation, for reference only! ![]() ![]() |
作者: 潜水划水喝水 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-11-10 06:42:28 評論於 Dude, which editor are you using? Why are you so slow? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 学术卡拉米 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-05 07:52:04 評論於 The track link in the wx public account is updated with the events of the previous day, around 6:10 am every day. Therefore, it may be slow. After submission, the track email sent by the editorial department is updated in real time. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 荔枝seed 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-04 15:51:27 評論於 Can I ask if it is okay to ignore the issue of exceeding 100 references when submitting the paper, and just fill in 100 references directly? In fact, there are already more than 110 references. Can requirements for charts and other similar elements also be ignored? ![]() ![]() |
作者: accept接到手软 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-03 10:46:08 評論於 Additionally, it seems that each editor of this magazine has a different style, and people I know have been influenced by the editor's opinions, but I have not. Also, the track system is a bit delayed. Even after the required review is completed, it still shows as under review. It only reminds me to update after receiving acceptance feedback. Furthermore, for review articles, it is essential to have a high standing and broad coverage. If there is a certain accumulation and profound understanding in the field of the main subject, it should be fine. ![]() ![]() |
作者: accept接到手软 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-03 10:41:08 評論於 6.18 submission 7.15 Major revisions, with a total of four reviewers, one of whom had very sharp comments. Around 8.17, revisions were completed and the magazine was uploaded. 9.13 Minor revisions were made after the major revisions were sent to four reviewers, but it seems that only 2 of them completed the review. A few days later, the tracking system showed that the editor suddenly invited 14 reviewers, but after waiting for a week, no one accepted the review. Suddenly, an email regarding the minor revisions was received, with comments only from one reviewer. 9.17 Minor revisions were completed and uploaded. 9.19 Under review, the editor also sent it to 2 reviewers. 9.30 Review completed, with comments from only 1 reviewer. 10.2 Received acceptance email. ![]() ![]() |
作者: accept接到手软 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-30 16:41:43 評論於 How are you now, OP? You encountered the same problem, inviting 14 reviewers for the first time and eventually giving up. I wonder how it will turn out this time. ![]() ![]() |
作者: accept接到手软 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-27 19:09:03 評論於 Is this your first time? But for a retake? I feel like there might still be a possibility of receiving further invitations. ![]() ![]() |
作者: pingya 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-27 15:21:00 評論於 According to the Track system, there are a total of two experts reviewing the manuscript, and currently, the review comments from both experts have been submitted. However, the status has not changed and still shows "Under Review". The Editor has not invited any additional reviewers. Is this situation normal? ![]() ![]() |
作者: accept接到手软 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-20 09:33:41 評論於 The first round was given a major revision, and after returning, two people completed the review. However, only one opinion was received. The editor made a small revision, and after the second round of returns, the editor gave it to two more people. Did the first return not receive any opinions from one person? Because 14 people were invited halfway through, it all ended in nothing, and only one opinion was directly sent to me. I am a little worried. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 是小杨先生 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-13 20:31:18 評論於 In the author's guidelines, it is noted that journals should not exceed 100 references. The initial draft can be trimmed to below 100 references, and additional references can be added during the later revision stages. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Xiang95 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-11 18:08:02 評論於 Dude, you are so fast, good luck! ![]() ![]() |
作者: Sicons 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-31 14:59:01 評論於 I would like to ask everyone for advice. The author's guide of this journal does not restrict the number of references, but the submission system requires no more than 100 references. However, I have noticed that many recently published articles have more than 100 references. How do they manage to do this? Do they simply ignore this requirement when submitting? I hope experienced seniors can offer some guidance on this matter. Thank you! ![]() ![]() |
作者: Jiaoxiniao 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-27 21:34:16 評論於 Original poster update, article accepted Submitted 3.23 With editor 3.24 Under review 3.29 Review complete 5.10 Major revision 5.14 Re-submit 6.4 With editor 6.6 Under review 6.13 Review complete 6.20 Minor revision 6.22 Re-submit 6.24 With editor 6.25 Under review 6.28 Review complete 7.16 Re-submit 7.24 With editor 7.25 Accepted 7.27 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 科研顺利-accept 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-19 14:09:02 評論於 Just resubmit after making the changes, worst case scenario is that it will be rejected again. Anyway, if you submit to another journal, you will have to make the modifications according to the current feedback. Try more, more opportunities. ![]() ![]() |
作者: lijfya 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-19 12:29:31 評論於 Two reviewers have made their decision, one with minor revisions and the other with a rejection. The editor did not say that it cannot be resubmitted, so I would like to ask if it can be resubmitted after making the necessary changes. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 帅的脚趾疼 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-17 18:24:01 評論於 Normally, if it is a self-built account making a submission, the relevant information can only be found in the account of the corresponding author after the submission is completed. ![]() ![]() |
作者: accept接到手软 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-11 21:25:58 評論於 It has been approximately 6-7 days since my application is under review. ![]() ![]() |
作者: Eiland 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-10 09:34:45 評論於 The system should be updating. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 投必中中中 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-07-09 18:26:30 評論於 After completing the submission information, it was transferred to the corresponding author for submission. I received a confirmation email from the author, but there is no status in the system, all showing as 0. I cannot see the status of the manuscript. Does anyone know what's going on? ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us