Rejected after one month of application.

(0) 讚！ | 分形维数与分数阶微积分

This situation is likely due to the author appealing the review comments. In cases where there are obvious errors in the review process, the appeal may be successful, and the review process will be restarted.

(0) 讚！ | win

"China Science: Mathematics Excellence (English Edition)" is currently receiving a fair amount of attention. However, there is something peculiar: shouldn't the editorial board fully consider the opinions of the reviewers in order to establish a top-notch mathematical journal? Otherwise, the editorial board could simply make the decision to accept or reject articles without going through so much trouble. There was one paper that we carefully read through and found the author's conclusions to be average, with no new breakthroughs in terms of methodology. Therefore, we do not recommend publishing it in SCM. Surprisingly, six months later, that paper was actually published in SCM.

(0) 讚！ | MathFA

Now, this is definitely a very difficult journal to publish in, so the quality of the papers should improve a lot!

(141) 讚！ | 一日游

The employment rate is so high???? Are you sure???? Did you ask the journal editor about the employment rate?

(0) 讚！ | YQQ71

I am advised to make revisions by both reviewers, but the editor rejected it directly. It's quite difficult to succeed in China's scientific community without connections.

(0) 讚！ | EulerGauss

May I ask my colleagues, what is the current level of SCM in international journals? Is it comparable to the Pacific Journal of Mathematics? I seek guidance.

(8) 讚！ | yifanmath

Now it is really difficult to conduct scientific research in China. Two reviewers agreed to accept the manuscript, and the editorial board also agreed to accept it. However, in the end, the editor-in-chief rejected it.

(214) 讚！ | Herry

I just received the revision comments. Other people are with two reviewers, but mine is with four. I thought that there are at least 3 foreign reviewers. What does that mean? The comments are very professional and difficult to revise.

(5) 讚！ | mathyyy

submitted the draft after six months to inform the review results, two reviewers, one passed, the other refused.Later, it was revised twice according to the reviewer's comments of the second reviewer and was finally accepted.It took 13 months.

(1) 讚！ | 提姆利博士

is getting better and better!More and more international bulls have posted on it!

(3) 讚！ | bb

submitted for more than two months without review, Awaiting Reviewer Selection

(0) 讚！ | 小菜鸟

The best mathematics journal in China.Its quality and influence should be further enhanced.

(7) 讚！ | 3272895469@qq.com

I think this process is still quite bumpy. 6 months waiting for the first review comments.

(0) 讚！ | 214682679@qq.com

6 months to review the review comments, only one year after the revision.After the revision, I am very anxious.

(1) 讚！ | chenyingying0620@163.com

Review speed is faster; the recruitment rate is about 60%.

(0) 讚！ | qichaoli@mail.bnu.edu.cn

The best journal in domestic mathematics

(8) 讚！ | 匿名