Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as headings

(0) 讚！ | worldfarmer

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as headings

(0) 讚！ | worldfarmer

Many articles, if I were the reviewer, would be rejected directly as they are not rigorous enough

(0) 讚！ | 抵制不良编辑

The editors of this journal are mostly Chinese, and I have noticed that they tend to reject submissions from non-Chinese authors. The external reviewers do not have any major complaints, so it may be a case of encountering bias from their peers

(0) 讚！ | 抵制不良编辑

The magazine is full of water, and the editor they hired is a fool, brainless. Stay away from this magazine

(0) 讚！ | 抵制不良编辑

The main focus of this publication's articles is boasting without paying taxes. It has become a forum for people in the country to brag

(0) 讚！ | fission Yeast

This journal is 80% Chinese articles. It's terrifying. It feels like everyone is trying to outdo each other in boasting and faking. They dare to write all kinds of amazing data. Double yields, broad-spectrum disease resistance... It's scary

(0) 讚！ | 种玉米的土豆

I have read several articles and they don't seem to be up to the standard of top-tier journals

(0) 讚！ | 渡渡鸟

Recently, I did some research on submitting articles and found that the reason why this magazine if surprisingly high is just because they are all hot topic articles. There is no threshold, it is easy to understand. The level of articles is not high, at the level of four or five points for ordinary magazines. There are almost no sources from foreign research institutions. It is already better than domestic journals. People abroad do not really recognize this journal. So there are fewer sources for foreign articles

(0) 讚！ | 首龚

I haven't heard much about this magazine

(0) 讚！ | 首龚

Strawberry Bear BBpop, hehe, this big shot, you should publish first before talking. Saying that articles are meaningless, no wonder you ended up in engineering, does that mean engineering is meaningless? What is the significance of theoretical research? Isn't it ultimately to guide applications? The rise in the quality of journals is achieved gradually, not all journals are born with high impact factors and high-quality papers, which journal does not want to be positioned as high-quality? All journals want to be positioned as high-end, but if all journals only accept high-level papers from the beginning, more than 99% of scientific research papers will not be published! Don't just criticize for the sake of criticizing!

(0) 讚！ | 金色柠檬

The editorial office has been stuck for two weeks, and now it's been under review for a month, and I still don't know the outcome. To be honest, it's a bit slow!!!

(0) 讚！ | yorkwallace

Agreed!!!

(0) 讚！ | yorkwallace

MP can't even compare with PC now... When did MP surpass PC? You can't be so unprofessional, can you?

(0) 讚！ | luofeiyu

MP can't be compared to PC now. When did MP surpass PC?

(0) 讚！ | luofeiyu

Stop kidding, the writing level of PBJ probably can't even reach the tail of PJ. Not to mention PC. It's just rubbish period and the article has no scientific significance. No wonder I only got engineering score

(0) 讚！ | 草莓熊bbpop

I haven't heard of this journal overseas, so I flipped through some recent articles. Except for the reviews, all of them are written by Chinese people. The quality of the articles is not very good. It's definitely a magazine that seeks to profit off China

(0) 讚！ | 草莓熊bbpop

Domestic famous spam journal. This magazine can hardly find foreign articles anymore, like a domestic magazine. Extremely low recognition abroad. Articles hardly emphasize scientific significance

(0) 讚！ | 潘德列

I uploaded it in DOCX format and didn't encounter any problems you mentioned. Is it because Word documents need to be edited with Office software and cannot be used with WPS, causing compatibility issues with WPS?

(0) 讚！ | 金色柠檬

Hello, I would like to ask if there are any requirements for the format of the submission. Why did the editor say that my submission cannot be converted to PDF after I submitted it? I have submitted it in .docx format, which should be correct. The submission system also cannot recognize the content of the submission

(0) 讚！ | /accept/

Master, I would like to ask if there are any requirements for the format of the submitted manuscript, and why did the editor say that my manuscript cannot be converted to PDF after I submitted it? I have to resubmit, but my file is in .docx format, which should be fine. I've been trying for two days and it's still the same

(0) 讚！ | /accept/

The editor-in-chief is performing an initial assessment, which will take approximately 3-4 days. After that, the EO (Editor's Office) will be under review, and it has already been a week. Can anyone provide a reference time? Once the manuscript is submitted, continuous checks will begin.

(0) 讚！ | 12345679

eo: editorial office, under review. This status has been stuck for a week now. I wanted to ask everyone how long it will take for a change? Should I remind the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 12345679

May I ask if your status has changed to under review? My status has been stuck for a week. I check every day and I'm getting very anxious.

(0) 讚！ | 12345679

This publication is very peculiar, with mediocre article quality but a high impact factor (if). The main reason is that the published articles are all very popular and accessible. They have great citation potential, but their scientific value is low.

In recent years, the impact factor of plant journals has skyrocketed, thanks to the contributions of Chinese researchers. Plant-related articles are easy to understand and replicate, making them highly cited by Chinese researchers. On the other hand, many articles published in prestigious journals involve complex concepts. Although they have high scientific value, most Chinese readers cannot understand them and therefore cannot cite them, resulting in a low impact factor. If is really a mysterious thing.

(0) 讚！ | 茜54655