I submitted an article at the beginning of the year, and it has been almost 3 months, but it is still under review.

(0) 讚！ | iiiscience

Submitted on 24.12 -- Minor revisions given after 1 month -- Returned for revisions after 3 weeks -- Accepted 3 weeks after the second review.

(0) 讚！ | rogerzz

Is it true or false, is it so easy now? Is it really this easy to invest?

(0) 讚！ | laofu

So sometimes investing domestically is also a last resort, the reality is like this, you can pursue your ideals, but if you don't consider reality, you will sometimes feel very uncomfortable. Solve the real problems first and then start pursuing your ideals.

(0) 讚！ | Insect2

This magazine is so trashy, it's just a garbage dump. They publish all sorts of crappy articles. The results are totally unreliable. All hype.

(0) 讚！ | fission Yeast

Chinese people's water-filled trash magazines have almost zero credibility, lacking any scientific significance. Full of empty words.

(0) 讚！ | fission Yeast

I would like to ask, after Xiao Xiu returns, will it take exactly one month to make a decision, or approximately how long? Because I saw in the email that it is recommended to make a decision within 30 days.

(0) 讚！ | ison-

On average, within a month, the next status is "Awaiting decision from Associate Editor."

(0) 讚！ | 墟散琰琬

Hmm, if the quality of the submission is good, I feel like time will pass by faster.

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

May I ask how long the status "EO: Editor office, under review" will last and what the next status will be?

(0) 讚！ | 落英子晋

Excuse me, how long will the status of "EO: Editor office, under review" last, and what is the next status?

(0) 讚！ | 落英子晋

Could you please tell me how long the status of "EO: Editor office, under review" will last, and what is the next status?

(0) 讚！ | 落英子晋

Could you tell me how long the status "EO: Editor office, under review" will last and what the next status will be?

(0) 讚！ | 落英子晋

May I ask how long the status of "EO: Editor office, under review" will last, and what is the next status?

(0) 讚！ | 落英子晋

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as headings

(0) 讚！ | worldfarmer

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and ":" as headings

(0) 讚！ | worldfarmer

Many articles, if I were the reviewer, would be rejected directly as they are not rigorous enough

(0) 讚！ | 抵制不良编辑

The editors of this journal are mostly Chinese, and I have noticed that they tend to reject submissions from non-Chinese authors. The external reviewers do not have any major complaints, so it may be a case of encountering bias from their peers

(0) 讚！ | 抵制不良编辑

The magazine is full of water, and the editor they hired is a fool, brainless. Stay away from this magazine

(0) 讚！ | 抵制不良编辑

The main focus of this publication's articles is boasting without paying taxes. It has become a forum for people in the country to brag

(0) 讚！ | fission Yeast

This journal is 80% Chinese articles. It's terrifying. It feels like everyone is trying to outdo each other in boasting and faking. They dare to write all kinds of amazing data. Double yields, broad-spectrum disease resistance... It's scary

(0) 讚！ | 种玉米的土豆

I have read several articles and they don't seem to be up to the standard of top-tier journals

(0) 讚！ | 渡渡鸟

Recently, I did some research on submitting articles and found that the reason why this magazine if surprisingly high is just because they are all hot topic articles. There is no threshold, it is easy to understand. The level of articles is not high, at the level of four or five points for ordinary magazines. There are almost no sources from foreign research institutions. It is already better than domestic journals. People abroad do not really recognize this journal. So there are fewer sources for foreign articles

(0) 讚！ | 首龚

I haven't heard much about this magazine

(0) 讚！ | 首龚

Strawberry Bear BBpop, hehe, this big shot, you should publish first before talking. Saying that articles are meaningless, no wonder you ended up in engineering, does that mean engineering is meaningless? What is the significance of theoretical research? Isn't it ultimately to guide applications? The rise in the quality of journals is achieved gradually, not all journals are born with high impact factors and high-quality papers, which journal does not want to be positioned as high-quality? All journals want to be positioned as high-end, but if all journals only accept high-level papers from the beginning, more than 99% of scientific research papers will not be published! Don't just criticize for the sake of criticizing!

(0) 讚！ | 金色柠檬