Why is the impact factor of Nano Today so low? Less than 13?

(0) 讚！ | asd3204

2024.6.4 decision in progress Cooling off. Vote for something else

(0) 讚！ | sunnybitc

Me too, 22nd with editor. Still not moving at the moment

(0) 讚！ | intuder

6.3 with editor

(0) 讚！ | sunnybitc

6.1 still with editor

(0) 讚！ | sunnybitc

Can I ask how to check the status of editing invitations for reviewers? I can't see it here

(0) 讚！ | lch21ct

The review process is extremely slow, it has been 10 months and it is still "under review". I am getting impatient and I don't know if there are similar situations. Should I consider withdrawing the submission?

(0) 讚！ | lch21ct

5.23 submitted
5.24 with editor
Status has been ongoing until now
Feels so slow

(0) 讚！ | sunnybitc

Yes, my situation is similar to yours. I invited two rounds of around ten people, but in the end, only three reviewers accepted and provided feedback

(0) 讚！ | LNTSL

Submitted at the end of January, reviewed within ten days, a three-month review process. Two waves of reviewers were invited, the first wave invited five reviewers but only two accepted and provided feedback. The second wave invited multiple reviewers, and finally one reviewer accepted and provided feedback. After major revisions, the manuscript was accepted after 20 days of revision, and an email from the editor was received in mid-May. Nearly five months of waiting, it was a long and difficult process, but it was all worth it!

(1) 讚！ | LNTSL

Never changed

(0) 讚！ | Rick-momo

Hello, may I ask if there have been any changes in the timing of the article with the editor?

(0) 讚！ | FERN0727

Submitted at the end of April, the next day With Editor, and there was no status change afterwards. Two weeks later, it was rejected without any reason

(0) 讚！ | Rick-momo

Currently, only one reviewer has completed the review, and it has been a month

(0) 讚！ | 一碗月亮茶

The submission was made at the end of January and was sent for review on February 5th. Two reviewers were assigned, but ther is no result yet. Waiting for the soft review

(23) 讚！ | 一碗月亮茶

Manuscripts that do not enter Under review and go directly to DIP are basically rejected without review. There is no need to have any illusions. So far, no exceptions have been seen

(0) 讚！ | zy965

How was the dip in the end?

(0) 讚！ | 062018

To be honest, the review process was quite fast. I submitted the paper on January 14th, and the next day on the 15th it was already with the editor. After about three or four days, the date changed once, presumably when the editor assigned an Associate Editor (AE). On January 23rd, the AE decided to change the status to "under review." When I checked the submission system, I found that the editor had invited 4 peer reviewers, but unfortunately none of them accepted to review the paper. This is probably why some people have to wait several months for their papers to be reviewed

(3) 讚！ | zy965

Hope the journal will be better and better

(0) 讚！ | 小奎哥2021

Hello, may I ask what time did you come back last time?

(0) 讚！ | Luckylily0615

What are the results?

(0) 讚！ | 木木草

What is the status after "with editor"?

(0) 讚！ | 木木草

Hello, may I ask when will the results be available?

(0) 讚！ | Luckylily0615

Indeed, if the significance of this DIP status is not known, it is enough to simply reject it without review. There is no need to drag on the manuscript and delay subsequent submissions

(0) 讚！ | 庆庆庆庆

You are so fast, it's admirable

(0) 讚！ | Chaney