The first issue raised by the editor regarding rejection was not clear to me. Can someone explain it to me? Thank you! The BioSample must be correctly amended in GenBank with contextual data following the checklist and recommendations of the MIxS standard/compliance.

(0) 讚！ | 努力努力再努力6

The submission was rejected immediately in the morning. I didn't understand one of the two suggestions made by the editor. Can someone help explain it to me? Issue: The BioSample must be correctly amended in GenBank with contextual data following the checklist and recommendations of the MIxS standard/compliance.

(0) 讚！ | 留云凌山

The Discussion section is the core part of an SCI paper, as it can demonstrate the breadth and depth of the author's research. Therefore, there is no specific word limit for this section. The length of the Discussion section varies depending on the article and the author, ranging from a few thousand words to tens of thousands of words

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The discussion section is the core part of an SCI paper, as it demonstrates the breadth and depth of the author's research. Therefore, there is no specific word limit for this section. Depending on the article and the author, the length of the discussion section can vary, ranging from a few thousand words to tens of thousands of words

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How many words should be typically included in a discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

Is the extensive discussion showcasing the author's thoughts on the topic? Did the reviewers have a positive impression of the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: Marine Genomics has been revised, the acceptance rate for Data articles used to be decent, but now it has become very strict. Editors will immediately reject if they feel it is mediocre, so there must be some novelty to it

(0) 讚！ | 无妄侠骞

Changed to a new editor, IF feels an upgrade

(0) 讚！ | 龙鳞景岩

Trashy magazines, who cares, just submit first and worry later

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁