My situation is the same, it's been a month already. What's going on? Have you heard anything, brother?

(0) 讚！ | txtx

The reviewer encountered in this journal is the most unreasonable reviewer encountered in the submission career. The first opinion was major revision, because the reviewer misread the key data of the article and based on his own imagination, made dozens of requests for additional experiments; after explaining the possible misunderstanding in the reply letter, the second opinion was minor revision, still misreading the characterization methods, and requesting the addition of four key experimental data. The first misunderstanding can be understood, but the second one inevitably makes people doubt the professionalism of the reviewer.
The editorial department is very efficient, and their attitude is also very good.

(0) 讚！ | 毕业快乐的咸鱼

My submission was also made on August 16th, and it has been in this state ever since. Can I request for an update on its progress?

(0) 讚！ | 骑着AK去撸猫

Has the status changed, brothers? I also applied for this. How many days until we receive a response?

(0) 讚！ | 睡不醒

Hey brother, has there been any changes in the status of your paper? I've been waiting for over a month and my paper is still in the same state as well.

(0) 讚！ | yang_Hua

The first trial ended on July 15, 2024, with minor revisions suggested by the editor; revised on July 25, 2024; provisionally accepted on August 1, 2024. (I didn't read the editor's email carefully because it was a review article, and there were a few images cited from other articles. The editor asked to resubmit the copyright application). Accepted on August 6, 2024; proofing on August 17, 2024; preparing for publication on August 17, 2024.

(0) 讚！ | Eimasr

Send a message in about 20 days.

(0) 讚！ | 111zz

It has been over a month and it's still in this state. Is this common for a first-time investment? Have any brothers experienced this situation?

(2) 讚！ | MXXHHS

2024.4.21 submitted
2024.5.15 Major Revisions
2024.6.21 Minor Revisions
2024.7.8 accept

(0) 讚！ | Zddddd

The editor is very responsible.

(0) 讚！ | Zddddd

June 29 is still Editorial Assessment.

(0) 讚！ | Eimasr

25-Jun-2024 resubmitted (It seems that JES's speed is not fast either, similar to the last submission to ACS & SCE, it took a week to be returned)

(0) 讚！ | Eimasr

Returned by Admin on 24-Jun-2024.

(0) 讚！ | Eimasr

20-Jun-2024 SUBMITTED
23-Jun-2024 Awaiting Admin Processing

(0) 讚！ | Eimasr

Pretty fast speed

(0) 讚！ | 毕业之前上岸满意的编制

2024.2.5 submitted
2024.2.25 major revise
2024.3.17 submitted
2024.4.4 accept
2024.4.9 proof
2024.4.20 published

(0) 讚！ | 毕业之前上岸满意的编制

So slow! It's been 4 weeks and still Awaiting Reviewer Assignment

(0) 讚！ | byyw

I have been waiting for a month and still awaiting the decision. What should I do?

(0) 讚！ | june...15

One obvious doubtful point is that in the WOS, the subject is MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS
category: SCIE Q2 7/21; but in the Chinese Academy of Sciences, MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS
Material Science: Films is in Zone 4

(0) 讚！ | Luckybastard

Speaking of partitions again: comparing a few journals, JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY (Engineering & Technology: 4th quartile, Electrochemistry: 3rd quartile / Materials Science: Membranes 4th quartile); Coatings (Materials Science: 3rd quartile, Materials Science: membranes 3rd quartile / Physics: applied 3rd quartile / Materials Science: integrated 4th quartile); IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES (Engineering & Technology: 2nd quartile, Physics: Applied 2nd quartile / Engineering: Electronics & Electrical 3rd quartile)
Conclusion: there is no logic in the Chinese Academy of Sciences' partitioning

(0) 讚！ | Luckybastard

Summary of the issues:
1. The formatting of the previous papers was very poor, but it seems to have improved recently, especially if authors provide formatting suggestions during proofreading.
2. The pixel resolution of the images after publication is too low, even if high-resolution images were uploaded, they still appear blurry.
3. Many articles from India may have been handled by Indian editors.
4. The advantage is that the peer review process is relatively fast

(0) 讚！ | Luckybastard

25-Jan-2024  Accept

(0) 讚！ | Luckybastard

29-Nov-2023 Submitted
14-Dec-2023 Major Revisions
10-Jan-2024 Submitted

(0) 讚！ | Luckybastard

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(0) 讚！ | Luckybastard

The initial review came back with editing suggestions to submit to their ECS Advances. After checking, it is the journal of this OA and not SCI. Can I write an email to the editor to reject the transfer submission and insist on submitting to JES?

(0) 讚！ | 左大旭