The slowest journal ever, this has always discouraged me from submitting articles to this journal

(0) 讚！ | Zhang

Bounced twice over two days, lightning strikes twice

(0) 讚！ | Vingegaard

Submitted for 2 days, the editor rejected it, saying it did not meet the requirements of this journal

(0) 讚！ | G. Mace

JPCM's partition is too miserable, this partition cannot even be used for graduation tears.

(0) 讚！ | 实验室在逃打工人

The journal is very good. After two revisions, it was accepted. However, it was classified as a fourth-tier publication during the award evaluation. If I had known earlier, I would have submitted it to CPB, which is classified as a third-tier publication.

(2) 讚！ | jiayouha

The reviewers’ comments of major revision in the first review came back 28 days later, and they gave me about 28 days to modify the article. I resubmitted it after 26 days and it was directly accepted directly after 21 days.

(0) 讚！ | 不掷骰子

has been submitteding for 1 and a half months, so far no news...What is the efficiency???

(2) 讚！ | 123

Now this journal is highly efficient, and it is also very responsible. It also helped to change the English, and the overhaul was accepted.Seeing that the impact factor is rising, I hope that it will be better and better.

(0) 讚！ | shaoy

This journal is very wonderful. The manuscript status does not see the reviewer's review progress, only wroteOne waited for the reviewer's opinion, and received the opinion about one month later. Since it was not sent to the anonymous reviewer for review, it was given to the editorial board of the journal. The simple two sentences were given, and no substantive was given.Opinions, suggestions, and useful information are purely perfunctory and very irresponsible.The editorial proposal was transferred to the open-charge journals that had just started publication for less than a year. It was not included in the sci, and I decisively refused.It is highly recommended not to select for this junk journal.

(2) 讚！ | Anonymous

My article has been submitted to PRL for review. One reviewer felt that the experimental results are good, but theoretically it was not innovative enough. They rejected my paper and recommended I select another publication. Later, I transferred my paper to the British Physical Society JPCM. The submission process is as follows: I submitted my manuscript on June 2; on July 11, the review comments were received. Both reviewers proposed to publish, and the editor only suggested a minor revision. The modification time is limited to 10 days. The revised draft was submitted on July 19 and the paper was officially accepted on August 8. In general, JPCM has relatively high theoretical and experimental requirements for an article. It is also a good, well-established journal in the field of condensed matter physics. I hope that everyone will cite the journal more. As of right now, the JPCM impact factor is relatively low.

(2) 讚！ | Anonymous

very quickly, rejected for three days, just for Halloween, no one reviewed!

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

EPL rejected the article, after the transfer, directly accept fast track communication.A total of 5 reviewers were found, the first batch of two, no news, the second batch of three, the second day gave the review comments directly accepted

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

three weeks out results, rejected ~

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-8984

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I received paper at this time last yearThe paper, the article submitted at the end of April, feels that the journal is still very efficient. After one month's review, the two minors accepted it. This is my first SCI feeling is quite smooth!

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Submitting speed is relatively fast, the old-fashioned condensed matter physics journal, this year's IF surge may be related to the recent release of review articles in this issue, PRB missed the select.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

The editorial board of this journal has a great decision-making power. Another feature is that the reviewer is often unable to report

(0) 讚！ | 匿名