How long will it last?

(0) 讚！ | relaxed

2024.1.30 submission
2024.2.2 Awaiting assignment to Associate Editor How long will this status last?

(0) 讚！ | DZY_D.

How long does it usually take to receive a decision?

(0) 讚！ | storm_pika

with ** referees under review, under editor refers to the responsible editor finding reviewers or making a decision.

(0) 讚！ | 中中中678

May I ask what is the meaning of "With one or more referees" and "With editor for evaluation" for this magazine?

(0) 讚！ | 高原

It was relatively tough during the 2020 Chinese New Year. The article was submitted before the Chinese New Year. The comments of the first review were returned during the pandemic period. It took one month from submission to the return of comments. It underwent two major revisions. The reviewers paid great attention to the statistical methods. The major revision could only be finished with difficulty in more than one month. It was now June 2020, and the requirements has finally changed into minor revisions. In general, the journal is professional, which is highly recognized in the industry. The editor was serious, and the requirements were high. All of the original data and statistical codes were required as supplementary materials. What’s more, there was a limit of 7,000 words in the article, which was too few, and it exceeded every time. I was keeping reducing and revising the language and content.

(2) 讚！ | x*x

It seems to be slow. Awaiting assignment to Associate Editor has lasted for almost 10 days.

(1) 讚！ | Ecosystem

submitted in mid-May this year. After 2 months, the remitted re-submission will be re-submitted. After the re-submitment, it will be received directly for more than one month. I feel that the opinion of the first instance is quite positive, butStill refused to re-submit the manuscript, may be the journal's strategy, received a re-reported re-submitment, and the possibility of receiving is still very large

(2) 讚！ | 咔咔

submitted in April 2016, rejected in August, but encouraged to resubmit the manuscript. After the journal was reviewed, the resubmission was equivalent to overhaul. It returned in November, the news was given at the end of January, and it was resubmitted.At this point, I feel very embarrassed. I have been around for a year, and I definitely want to continue, but I am afraid that I will be rejected. It is in vain for a year.In mid-April, I returned to the re-submitted manuscript and finally gave the news and received it on July 5.The article was received throughout the year and three months.Another month after the online.In short, the whole process is very testable, and I am very grateful to the editor for giving me the opportunity to make changes.Looking at the manuscript guide, it is not easy to receive an article. It may be that less than a quarter of the manuscript will be received, so although it took more than a year to publish the article, I still feel that my contribution has paid off.The data is to be uploaded and shared. In English, it is necessary to be in English. It is not too difficult to find English.

(0) 讚！ | oceanculture

submitted in April 2016, rejected in August, but encouraged to resubmit the manuscript. The state of the journal after reviewing the manuscript, resubmission is equivalent to overhaul, returning in November, giving news at the end of January, and resubmissionAt this point, I feel very embarrassed. I have been around for a year, and I definitely want to continue, but I am afraid that I will be rejected. It is in vain for a year.In mid-April, I returned to the re-submitted manuscript and finally gave the news and received it on July 5.The article was received throughout the year and three months.Another month after the online.In short, the whole process is very testable, and I am very grateful to the editor for giving me the opportunity to make changes.Looking at the submission guide, it is not easy to receive an article. It may be that less than a quarter of the manuscript will be received, so although it took more than a year to publish the article, I still feel that my contribution has paid off

(0) 讚！ | oceanculture

submitted in April 2016, rejected in August, but encouraged to resubmit the manuscript. After the journal was reviewed, the resubmission was equivalent to overhaul. It returned in November, the news was given at the end of January, and it was resubmitted.At this point, I feel very embarrassed. I have been around for a year, and I definitely want to continue, but I am afraid that I will be rejected. It is in vain for a year.In mid-April, I returned to the re-submitted manuscript and finally gave the news and received it on July 5.The article was received throughout the year and three months.Another month after the online.In short, the whole process is very testable, and I am very grateful to the editor for giving me the opportunity to make changes.Looking at the submission guide, it is not easy to receive an article. It may be that less than a quarter of the manuscript will be received, so although it took more than a year to publish the article, I still feel that my contribution has paid off

(0) 讚！ | weifejix@sina.com

Submitted in April 2015, rejected in August, but encouraged to resubmit the draft, the state of the journal after review, resubmission is equivalent to overhaulYes, I returned in November, gave the news at the end of January, and resubmitted the manuscript. At this point, I feel very embarrassed. I have been around for a year, and I definitely want to continue, but I am afraid that I will be rejected.It’s all in vain.In mid-April, I returned to the re-submitted manuscript and finally gave the news and received it on July 5.The article was received throughout the year and three months.Another month after the online.In short, the whole process is very testable, and I am very grateful to the editor for giving me the opportunity to make changes.Looking at the submission guide, it is not easy to receive an article. It may be that less than a quarter of the manuscript will be received, so although it took more than a year to publish the article, I still feel that my contribution has paid off

(0) 讚！ | weifejix@sina.com

Was rejected twice but the editors encouraged me to re-submit. For the first time, they were rejected by the Associate Editor. The second time, my paper was rejected by one of the reviewers. The last time I finally added all the information and re-submitted to two reviewers. I waited for more than two months and finally received an acceptance. After 6 months, 4 review rounds, the manuscript received three positive responses. The editor is really responsible.

(2) 讚！ | 雅克布

British publication previously included in ScI, which may be less difficult than ESA publications.There is a two-item article on eecological applications, two editors with a positive opinion, one major revision, and the results rejected.We will revise once and apply for this publication.But time is indeed longer than other publications.The word-of-mouth is

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.journalofappliedecology.org/view/0/index.html

(2) 讚！ | 匿名

UK Magazine, basicallyGive priority to publishing jobs in the UK.The journal has a small capacity and is slow to review.General work is not recommended.Good work should be done with caution when writing, and the British are left.The government is helpful to publish.

(2) 讚！ | 匿名