Did you invest later on?

(0) 讚！ | 李H

24.5.14 submitted
24.7.16 reject and resubmit
24.9.6 resubmit
24.9.16 accept

(1) 讚！ | xiezilailai

Dude, why are you still investing when the reputation is bad? Don't bite the hand that feeds you and then blame it, should we just issue a warning tomorrow?

(2) 讚！ | 学吊一枚

The specific timeline is as follows: 
- 2024.07.02 Submitted to Journal & Undergoing Review 
- 2024.08.21 Manuscript Need Revision, with comments from two reviewers overall positive, estimated minor revisions needed 
- 2024.09.02 Submitted to Journal & Undergoing Review, with Response and revised paper submitted 
- 2024.09.10 Accept, with the associate editor's opinion being Accept as is 
Overall, the first review took longer, 50 days in total, while the second review only took 8 days, possibly due to the thorough and well-presented Response.

(0) 讚！ | OneSway

The specific timeline is as follows:
2024.07.02 Submitted to Journal & Undergoing Review
2024.08.21 Manuscript Need Revision, a total of two reviewers provided feedback, overall positive evaluation, estimated to be a minor revision
2024.09.02 Submitted to Journal & Undergoing Review, submitted Response and revised paper
2024.09.10 Accept, the associate editor's opinion is Accept as is
Overall, the first review took longer, 50 days; the second review only took 8 days, possibly due to the comprehensive and well-presented Response.

(0) 讚！ | OneSway

The review process was relatively fast this time, taking just over two months in total, and the reviewers' comments were constructive.

(0) 讚！ | OneSway

2024 1.7 Submitted
2024 5.1 Revisions Required
2024 5.21 Revision submitted
2024 8.16 Accepted

It has completely deviated from the purpose of the letter, not recommended for submission in pursuit of speed.

(0) 讚！ | zcccy

I submitted the article for a year and was rejected and resubmitted twice. The process in between was very tumultuous and time-consuming, the efficiency of the journal was very low, with the first response taking 5 months. It is necessary to carefully submit research results as soon as possible. 

8/29/23 First submission
Waited for 5 months in between and sent a reminder
2/1/24 Reject and Resubmit - two reviewers, returned after revisions, their comments were not strict, suspecting the editors intentionally rejected the submission to shorten their average review time
3/15/24 Second submission
5/3/24 Reject and Resubmit - still two reviewers, revised and resubmitted, similar to the first time, reviewers' comments were not very strict
5/22/24 Third submission
7/30/24 Minor revision - same reviewers as the second time, one had no comments, the other had two minor points
7/31/24 Returned after revisions
8/7/24 Accept

(0) 讚！ | Logan_yiyuan

SUBMITTED 14-May-2024
Reject and Resubmit 16-Jul-2024
Should we resubmit again? The amount of work needed to make the required changes is quite significant...

(0) 讚！ | xiezilailai

You can resubmit, but you need to include the previous feedback and revisions, just like a major revision. However, resubmitting the same idea won't work unless you make some changes. Once you have addressed the other issues, you can resubmit.

(0) 讚！ | 编辑从不给我送审

Last year, I saw my peers all investing, so I tried it too. I didn't expect to win in just three months, although the reputation is not very good. In the past two years, it has been flooded with people doing machine learning, and anyone can develop a model easily. Now the impact factor has dropped to 4, as expected. If we don't control it, it may drop to 3 next year.

(0) 讚！ | 78文哥

Can I make a new submission after being rejected?

(0) 讚！ | 小木提欧人

Hope to return to District Two soon

(0) 讚！ | WithEnthusiasm

reject (08-feb-2024)
submitted(08-apr-2024)
revisions required (08-may-2024)
minor - a revision has been submitted（11-may-2024）
accept (06-jun-2024

(0) 讚！ | WithEnthusiasm

Submitted (03-Jan-2024)
Reject (08-Feb-2024)
Submitted (08-Apr-2024)
Revisions Required (08-May-2024)
Minor - a revision has been submitted (11-May-2024)
Accept (06-Jun-2024

(1) 讚！ | WithEnthusiasm

It should have been submitted for review already. Don't worry, I waited for one round for four months before I received it. You can send an email to ask about it

(2) 讚！ | 编辑从不给我送审

It has been three months, and it is still Undergoing Review

(1) 讚！ | Boer

I have been waiting for three weeks and my status is still undergoing review. Does this mean that the editor and reviewers have been assigned?

(0) 讚！ | xiezilailai

I was rejected twice before, made two revisions, submitted response letters each time, and had to include the previous rejection ID on the cover letter to inform the editor that it is a resubmission. It was only accepted on the third attempt. 
First submission, 2 reviewers
2023.4.23 manuscript submitted
2023.7.8 reject
Second submission, 2 reviewers, took four months this time, the longest, and even changed chief editor later, possibly due to year-end personnel changes in the journal leading to longer processing time
2023.8.27 manuscript submitted
2023.12.18 reject
Third submission, 2 reviewers, seemingly the same as before, as the reviews mentioned that the revisions made it much better than before, finally accepted after a year of agony!
2024.2.26 manuscript submitted
2024.5.3 revision due in 21 days
2024.5.16 revised manuscript submitted
2024.5.29 accept
Submission period lasted 3 months, which is actually reasonable considering the circumstances

(1) 讚！ | 编辑从不给我送审

It's been excessive to gain so much weight in just seven months

(0) 讚！ | llstudy

Hello, may I ask if a response letter is needed when transferring to grsl, and will new reviewers be assigned?

(0) 讚！ | qiewyhdu

Is there any follow-up now?

(0) 讚！ | 爱吃煎饼

Predatory journal, fuck! Seven months after the initial review, they said my paper doesn't fit their format and is not suitable for publication in GRSL

(0) 讚！ | marico2025

Submitted on October 28th, 23, still Undergoing Review status, it's taking too long!

(0) 讚！ | marico2025

I submitted my paper for 6 months before the first revision, and after the revision, both reviewers had no comments. However, the editor rejected my paper with some new suggestions, and I am at a loss

(0) 讚！ | Z421JJ