6.7 Awaiting DE Recommendation

(0) 讚！ | 向云端嗯嗯嗯

6.6 Awaiting AE Recommendation

(0) 讚！ | 向云端嗯嗯嗯

The 8000-word limit for this journal refers to the word count excluding references, not the entire text being limited to 8000 words. This condition should be fairly easy to meet, right? Mine is around 6000 words excluding references

(0) 讚！ | 向云端嗯嗯嗯

Hello friend, I have seen your traces in many journals and feel that we should be in related fields. May I ask if the word limit of this journal (8000) is very strict? Thank you~

(0) 讚！ | 24March

Okay, thank you

(0) 讚！ | carolmachong

You see on my profile timeline, it was under review one month later awaiting reviewer assignment, and three days later awaiting reviewer scores

(0) 讚！ | 向云端嗯嗯嗯

Hello, my submission is currently under review and I have not seen the status "awaiting reviewers scores" yet. Have you experienced this status before?

(0) 讚！ | carolmachong

4.28 Awaiting Reviewer Scores

(0) 讚！ | 向云端嗯嗯嗯

3.25 Submited+Under Review (ADM: Rathinavel, Dharani)
4.25 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
Good luck

(0) 讚！ | 向云端嗯嗯嗯

I am in the same situation, and I don't know why

(0) 讚！ | 向云端嗯嗯嗯

There are too many review comments to make accurate revisions. The requirements of this journal are quite strict, even though it is not highly ranked in terms of section or impact factor

(1) 讚！ | Earth Worker

May I ask if there is a charge for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | LISA-田

My question is for those who submit articles for publication: when filling out the submission system, if the first author is a student and the teacher is listed as the corresponding author (submitting author) at the end, why is it that when you download the manuscript, the first author listed is the teacher and not the student?

(0) 讚！ | Peng123456

Hello, may I ask how you found the reviewer for the first round? Did you submit your manuscript through the willy system? My submission has been stuck at "under review" for three months now. Should I follow up on it?

(0) 讚！ | agricultural

2022.11.03 Submission
2023.3.15 Revision (The reviewer's review speed was fast, but it took a long time due to a failure to find a reviewer)
2023.4.10 Submission (Requested a return within four weeks, two reviewers, over 100 review comments)
2023.5.23 Rejection The editor considered the modifications made based on the reviewer's comments to be inadequate.
Overall, the experience of submitting this time was not pleasant. Firstly, the progress was slow (four months for the first review, one and a half months for the second review). Secondly, one of the reviewers' comments were not reasonable (which was the main reason for rejection). That's all, I wish you all smooth submissions in the future.

(0) 讚！ | 一步一个坑

The overall quality is getting better, but unfortunately the impact factor has decreased quite significantly. The number of publications is gradually increasing now, so the future should be good (hopefully). 

April 1, 2022: Submitted for review
April 17, 2022: Initial review
June 9, 2022: Major revision, given one month for revisions, with 48 comments
July 4, 2022: Uploaded revised manuscript
July 9, 2022: Accepted, reviewer had 0 comments, which is really unexpected!

(2) 讚！ | zhangj

Not only that, but also stronger than SBB, what is Catena!

(0) 讚！ | 椭圆三向箔

How come such a good journal can't move up from Zone 2? This journal is at least a bit stronger than Catena.

(27) 讚！ | 哎呦不错

It’s miserable. I thought it was the top in Q1, but it suddenly dropped to Q3 in the field of Soil Science. My God!

(0) 讚！ | ......................

It was forced out of Q1 and could not even retain Q2. I am bitterly disappointed.

(1) 讚！ | 寂玄道隐士

A classic journal of soil science with high quality articles. The editor was very professional and responsible, and even helped to modify the language.

(4) 讚！ | keepflying

March submitted, one overhaul twice minor repair, receive

(2) 讚！ | 316763080@qq.com

This year is a smashing, why the British Soil Association journal, the impact factor plummeted...

(0) 讚！ | soil

old soil journals, more than 100 articles per year.Both of them have been selectd for, but they have been revised at least twice.Editor-in-chief, help change the language.Online slower

(1) 讚！ | 812210132@qq.com

Injected in September 2011, returned to the revised opinion in January 2012, received in early June, the reviewer is more polite, but the format language requirements are relatively high.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名