(According to the latest JCR data, this journal is not indexed in the JCR.)LetPub Score
6.2
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation
7.5
Influence
4.9
Speed
7.0
期刊簡稱
POLICY SCI
ISSN
0032-2687
E-ISSN
1573-0891
h-index
N.A.
CiteScore
CiteScore
SJR
SNIP
CiteScore Rank
9.70
1.635
1.743
Subject field
Quartiles
Rank
Percentile
Category: Social Sciences Subcategory: General Social Sciences
Q1
7 / 275
Category: Social Sciences Subcategory: Sociology and Political Science
Q1
37 / 1466
Category: Social Sciences Subcategory: Public Administration
Q1
12 / 232
Category: Social Sciences Subcategory: Development
Q1
19 / 306
Category: Social Sciences Subcategory: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Q1
46 / 399
自引率 (2023-2024)
13.20%自引率趨勢
掲載範囲
The policy sciences are distinctive within the policy movement in that they embrace the scholarly traditions innovated and elaborated by Harold D. Lasswell and Myres S. McDougal. Within these pages we provide space for approaches that are problem-oriented, contextual, and multi-method in orientation. There are many other journals in which authors can take top-down, deductive, and large-sample approach or adopt a primarily theoretical focus. Policy Sciences encourages systematic and empirical investigations in which problems are clearly identified from a practical and theoretical perspective, are well situated in the extant literature, and are investigated utilizing methodologies compatible with contextual, as opposed to reductionist, understandings. We tend not to publish pieces that are solely theoretical, but favor works in which the applied policy lessons are clearly articulated. Policy Sciences favors, but does not publish exclusively, works that either explicitly or implicitly utilize the policy sciences framework. The policy sciences can be applied to articles with greater or lesser intensity to accommodate the focus of an author’s work. At the minimum, this means taking a problem oriented, multi-method or contextual approach. At the fullest expression, it may mean leveraging central theory or explicitly applying aspects of the framework, which is comprised of three principal dimensions: (1) social process, which is mapped in terms of participants, perspectives, situations, base values, strategies, outcomes and effects, with values (power, wealth, enlightenment, skill, rectitude, respect, well-being, and affection) being the key elements in understanding participants’ behaviors and interactions; (2) decision process, which is mapped in terms of seven functions—intelligence, promotion, prescription, invocation, application, termination, and appraisal; and (3) problem orientation, which comprises the intellectual tasks of clarifying goals, describing trends, analyzing conditions, projecting developments, and inventing, evaluating, and selecting alternatives. There is a more extensive core literature that also applies and can be visited at the policy sciences website: http://www.policysciences.org/classicworks.cfm. In addition to articles that explicitly utilize the policy sciences framework, Policy Sciences has a long tradition of publishing papers that draw on various aspects of that framework and its central theory as well as high quality conceptual pieces that address key challenges, opportunities, or approaches in ways congruent with the perspective that this journal strives to maintain and extend.Officially cited as: Policy Sci
Note to users: The content shown here is based on the voluntary contributions of your peers in the scientific community. We encourage you to reciprocate by sharing your submission experience.