Accepted after revision, it will be published two months after acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | 爆炸冲击波

Hello, what's the matter with not having an article number after submission? Do we have to wait for a period of time before receiving the number? Also, one of the co-authors did not receive the email to confirm, will this have any impact? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | NUAA卢本伟

It took a total of three months to finally be accepted. Now it is in the second district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, hoping to do better and better.

submitted to journal 2024-04-30
editor in chief 2024-05-06
with editor 2024-05-06
under review after submitting for confidentiality review 2024-05-07
under review 2024-05-24
Major revision 2024-06-20
Revision Submitted to Journal 2024-06-27
with editor 2024-06-28
under review 2024-06-28
Minor revision 2024-07-03
Revision Submitted to Journal 2024-07-03
Decision in process 2024-07-05
Accept 2024-07-24

(0) 讚！ | 白杨战风沙

投了，被秒拒，感觉非常沮丧。

(0) 讚！ | Dawn0913

My colleagues within the circle all feel that the Chinese version is a trap, the reviewers are very unprofessional, and they are also arrogant.

(0) 讚！ | 洞悉

Unfollow! Just like the Chinese version, it's a magazine for circle watchers

(0) 讚！ | Chang

Isn't it nice to save you time?

(0) 讚！ | SCIACCEPTSCI

I submitted to Area 1 and it took two months for review, but when I submitted to DT, it was rejected in 14 minutes. I'm not going to submit anymore, this journal is really biased, too used to domestic practices

(2) 讚！ | 冷雨

My paper received mild revision suggestions from all three reviewers, but the editor rejected it directly, stating that "our reviewers have advised us that your paper requires major revisions." I thought this journal only accepted papers after one round of revisions, but after reading everyone's comments, it turns out major revisions are allowed. What a rubbish journal, I won't submit to it again in the future

(0) 讚！ | 12399321

Just like you, the reviewers didn't say anything, and the editors rejected it. It's extremely disgusting!

(0) 讚！ | Chang

Coming back just to criticize a trashy journal, aiming for control, they found me an editor who caused an explosion injury within a week. Rejected in 5 minutes, saying it lacked innovation. Already accepted by a top journal, what a joke

(1) 讚！ | Gundam-

The journal that the thief didn't understand, several reviewers provided revision suggestions, and in fact the suggestions were very mild, but the editor rejected it. Is it necessary for the reviewers to accept the submission in order to be accepted? What is the point of sending for review if suggestions for revision are not allowed? Language issues were also mentioned, and even though two foreign scholars polished it twice, the reason for rejection is still hard to accept

(1) 讚！ | 木易HIT

The rejection speed is very fast. Each time I receive a submission number, I receive rejection in less than a minute. It's incredible. This rejection speed definitely deserves a thumbs up. It seems that domestic journals are not as good as foreign ones. Sigh, I will prioritize submitting to foreign journals in the future

(0) 讚！ | 君莫尘

I used the template directly from the official website, it seems that the restrictions in this regard are not very strict, and the editors will help you reformat

(0) 讚！ | 星踪

Is it currently 750¥ per page?

(0) 讚！ | 小石头

Do you use the template provided by the journal when submitting your article? The journal template looks ugly and does not have a LaTeX template. The equations are one font size larger than the text, making it look like a very old template. Did you use this template when submitting your article or did you format it yourself?

(0) 讚！ | gxpjzbg

Do you use a journal template when submitting your manuscript? I feel like the template provided by the journal is quite ugly, there is no latex template, and the equations are one font size bigger than the body text, it feels like a very old template. Did you use this template when submitting your manuscript or did you format it yourself?

(0) 讚！ | gxpjzbg

Two reviewers provided several explanatory comments, as well as pointed out the inadequacy of the control experiment, resulting in the editor rejecting the manuscript

(0) 讚！ | wyxjy51968

Is there a fixed template for confidentiality review, is it necessary?

(0) 讚！ | 懒懒的小狗

What form does this confidentiality review take, and what information needs to be submitted?

(0) 讚！ | 懒懒的小狗

The first submission went smoothly, communication with the editor was efficient, and the reviewer's comments were very constructive. After careful revisions, the paper was accepted, taking a total of 4 months

(0) 讚！ | 星踪

July 2, 2022 Submission
January 5, 2023 Major Revision
February 3, 2023 Minor Revision
July 15, 2023 Accepted
I don't know why it was so slow, but the result is good, so I'm happy

(1) 讚！ | 小博同学早日毕业

Finally, after ten months of waiting, I have been hired. I am grateful, so grateful. It seems that the journal requires at least two reviewers, and most of my time was spent on finding reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 多多中SCI!!!

May I ask if the status "decision in process" appears directly after the first round of "under review," or is it "major"?

(0) 讚！ | Nixi

Did you receive the status "decision in process" after the first round of review, or did it go straight to "major revision"?

(0) 讚！ | Nixi