X
    學術可視化工作室RC   登錄   提交文稿
學術英文編修

PLoS Computational Biology

期刊標題檢索 PLOS COMPUT BIO 最新評論: Is there a requirement for the number of pages in the paper? (2022-04-28)


期刊名稱:   ISSN:   主題領域:   影響因子範圍: -
索引:   類別:   開放訪問:   排序方式:

[PLoS Computational Biology]您好,您是該頁面的第 8523 位訪客。

期刊簡介
期刊名稱PLoS Computational Biology PLoS Computational Biology
LetPub Score
7.1
50 ratings
Rate

Reputation
8.2

Influence
6.2

Speed
7.0

期刊簡稱PLOS COMPUT BIOL
ISSN1553-7358
h-indexN.A.
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.101.6521.085
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Mathematics
Subcategory: Modeling and Simulation
Q132 / 324
Category: Mathematics
Subcategory: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Q187 / 721
Category: Mathematics
Subcategory: Computational Theory and Mathematics
Q123 / 176
Category: Mathematics
Subcategory: Ecology
Q163 / 461
Category: Mathematics
Subcategory: Genetics
Q297 / 347
Category: Mathematics
Subcategory: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
Q234 / 97
Category: Mathematics
Subcategory: Molecular Biology
Q2163 / 410

自引率 (2023-2024)5.30%自引率趨勢
掲載範囲
PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales—from molecules and cells, to patient populations and ecosystems—through the application of computational methods. Readers include life and computational scientists, who can take the important findings presented here to the next level of discovery.

Research articles must be declared as belonging to a relevant section. More information about the sections can be found in the submission guidelines.

Research articles should model aspects of biological systems, demonstrate both methodological and scientific novelty, and provide profound new biological insights.

Generally, reliability and significance of biological discovery through computation should be validated and enriched by experimental studies. Inclusion of experimental validation is not required for publication, but should be referenced where possible. Inclusion of experimental validation of a modest biological discovery through computation does not render a manuscript suitable for PLOS Computational Biology.

Research articles specifically designated as Methods papers should describe outstanding methods of exceptional importance that have been shown, or have the promise to provide new biological insights. The method must already be widely adopted, or have the promise of wide adoption by a broad community of users. Enhancements to existing published methods will only be considered if those enhancements bring exceptional new capabilities.
官方網站https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/
在線稿件提交https://www.editorialmanager.com/PCOMPBIOL
開放訪問Yes
出版商Public Library of Science
主題領域Environmental Science
出版國/地區United States
發行頻率
創刊年0
每年文章數637每年文章數趨勢
黃金OA百分比99.67%
OA Related Info
APC: Yes( USD2926; )
APC waiver:Check Notes
Other charges: No
Keywords: computational biology、biological systems、biological modelling
Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardPeer review
Web of Science 四分位
2023-2024
WOS Quartile: Q1

CategoryEditionJIF QuartileJIF RankingJIF Percentage
BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODSSCIEQ115/85
MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGYSCIEQ111/65
索引 (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1553-7358%5BISSN%5D
平均審稿時間 *來自出版商的數據:
來自作者的數據: 32 Weeks
競爭力 *來自作者的數據:
參考鏈接
相關期刊 【PLoS Computational Biology】CiteScore趨勢
自引率趨勢 每年文章數趨勢
作者評論
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。
  • 同一學科的期刊
  • CiteScore趨勢
  • 自引率趨勢
  • 每年文章數趨勢
  •  
    學科內的可信期刊 影響因子
    Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-WaterH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 16.60
    Current Opinion in Insect ScienceH-index: 27

    CiteScore: 10.40
    Horticultural Plant JournalH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 9.60
    Acta Ecologica SinicaH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 1.40
    Journal of Plant EcologyH-index: 25

    CiteScore: 4.60
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMSH-index: 44

    CiteScore: 5.70
    Anthropocene ReviewH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 5.30
    Frontiers in Ecology and EvolutionH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 4.00
    Plant DirectH-index: 0

    CiteScore: 5.00
    Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural HistoryH-index: 13

    CiteScore: 2.40
    學科內最受檢索的期刊 頁面查看次數
    Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution84953
    Horticultural Plant Journal68812
    Journal of Plant Ecology55038
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS36804
    Landscape and Ecological Engineering28160
    Current Opinion in Insect Science25432
    Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Water19509
    Plant Direct18898
    TAIWANIA12177
    ACTA AMAZONICA11260
  •  

    PLoS Computational Biology PLoS Computational Biology
    明年預測:
    穩步上升 無變化 逐步下降  刷新
  •  

     
  •  

     


首頁    上一頁    1    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/1)
  [PLoS Computational Biology] 的評論撰寫評論
作者: 四风清芬


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2022-04-28 12:37:59 評論於
Is there a requirement for the number of pages in the paper?
(0) 讚! | 四风清芬

作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2021-12-30 10:42:36 評論於
The model diagram can vividly and directly illustrate the overall idea of the article
(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

作者: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2021-12-30 09:39:59 評論於
Simply read the abstract and conclusion to determine how much of your content has been published ahead of time; quickly organize and submit to journals with IF factors lower than those already published
(0) 讚! | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

作者: 陶宜三岁啦


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2021-12-27 20:50:29 評論於
Is the use of model diagrams advantageous or disadvantageous for reviewers' attitudes towards the manuscript?
(0) 讚! | 陶宜三岁啦

作者: 北国博达


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2021-12-27 08:15:30 評論於
What to do if experimental data is published ahead of schedule?
(0) 讚! | 北国博达

作者: 邻家凡海


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2020-03-27 10:52:01 評論於
How long did the first review take? 177****2124 No nickname 2020-03-18 Posted :: Acceptance rate: about 25% Review time: about 6 months It's really frustrating. I submitted in July 2019, got major revisions in the first review, couldn't find a reviewer for the second review, dragged on for eight months, and withdrew the submission today. Originally, I was supposed to graduate smoothly, but now I probably have to extend it. If I have another chance, I will never submit again. I heard they are losing money every year! The editing efficiency is still low! That's enough, it's all tears, maybe I'm just that unlucky child!
(0) 讚! | 邻家凡海

作者: 排云东方


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2020-03-18 13:22:46 評論於
Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Sharing experience: It's really frustrating. I submitted in July 2019, received major revisions in the first review, couldn't find a reviewer for the second review, and it took eight months. Today, I withdrew the submission. I was supposed to graduate smoothly, but now it looks like I'll have to extend my graduation date. If I were given another chance, I would never submit again. They say it's losing money every year! The editorial efficiency is also low! That's enough. It's all tears. Maybe I'm just an unlucky child!
(0) 讚! | 排云东方

作者: 一条小琪睿


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2019-11-14 10:45:56 評論於
One of the most reputable journals in computational biology, I was very lucky to have one of my articles accepted. The reviewers were very professional and their feedback significantly improved the quality of my article. The editors were also especially nice, responding promptly to all my queries and providing support
(0) 讚! | 一条小琪睿

作者: 黑山飞驰


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2019-10-23 20:32:04 評論於
The most recognized journal in the fields of mathematics and computational biology. Bioinformatics has a slightly different style, emphasizing biological significance more. The proportion of papers published by Chinese scholars (including co-signatories) in PCB is less than 5%. While in Bioinformatics, it is over 15%. It can be seen that the difficulty of publishing papers in PCB
(0) 讚! | 黑山飞驰

作者: 五轮耀兴


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2019-10-23 11:07:12 評論於
Top journals in the field of computational systems biology are relatively niche, but highly regarded and prestigious among academic peers
(0) 讚! | 五轮耀兴

作者: Conrad Bernal


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2019-08-26 10:28:30 評論於
Review Speed: 1.0
Experience Sharing: The review date is really fast. I submitted an article for graduation, and it is currently being revised. I can see that the reviewers come from different fields and the advice given is different compared to bioinformatics, where you need to pay
(0) 讚! | Conrad Bernal

作者: 排云东方


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2019-07-11 15:32:06 評論於
If no one else responds, I will share my submission experience after it is completed, whether it is accepted or not
(0) 讚! | 排云东方

作者: 排云东方


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2019-07-08 19:44:24 評論於
Does anyone know this journal?
(0) 讚! | 排云东方

作者: 凌霄高洁


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2017-07-16 13:02:20 評論於
Stuck in a standstill, but at this critical juncture, it's not easy to push forward anymore. Getting over 4 points, I'm satisfied with that
(0) 讚! | 凌霄高洁

作者: 雾水采绿


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2017-04-17 17:35:45 評論於
Review Speed: 1.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: The review process tends to focus more on theoretical issues
(0) 讚! | 雾水采绿

作者: 雨文三岁啦


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2016-12-07 18:17:42 評論於
Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: How much to pay?
(0) 讚! | 雨文三岁啦

作者: 巧兰来了


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2016-11-07 08:10:54 評論於
The initial review took four months, which was too slow
(0) 讚! | 巧兰来了

作者: 药王沛萍


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2016-08-23 09:10:55 評論於
Has anyone recently come across this journal? Can you provide some information?
(0) 讚! | 药王沛萍

作者: 凌霄高洁


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2014-01-06 19:06:12 評論於
Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: The review process is extremely slow, it took four months for the initial review, and it has been one month with "decision in process," what a nightmare
(0) 讚! | 凌霄高洁

作者: 风啸晓曼


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2014-01-06 15:32:08 評論於
How come you don't have any experience in submitting manuscripts?
(0) 讚! | 风啸晓曼

作者: 凌霄高洁


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2013-06-24 21:42:47 評論於
2012 IF = 4.867
(0) 讚! | 凌霄高洁

作者: 深渊逸翔


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2013-04-10 12:25:24 評論於
Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: A relatively good journal in computational biology (said to have ranked second in computational biology journals in 2012). It is generally difficult to get accepted. At that time, I was not confident about submitting my paper, but with encouragement from a foreign supervisor, I decided to submit it. First is the editor's invitation and initial review (about 10 days); then comes the external review, with three reviewers participating (about one month); after making revisions based on reviewers' comments, a deadline is usually given (in my case, one reviewer agreed and two reviewers suggested additional data, giving two months for submission); the second review is usually quick (about two weeks); followed by the editor's decision phase (about 10 days); finally, you will be notified of the payment and official publication date. In addition, the journal requires authors to do their own formatting, with a lot of requirements for images and tables, and you can see many published ones
(0) 讚! | 深渊逸翔

作者: 凌霄高洁


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2012-11-11 16:57:20 評論於
2011 IF=5.215
(0) 讚! | 凌霄高洁

作者: Cliff Cook


領域: 生物学
審稿時間: 0.0 month(s)
結果: 待定&不明


撰寫評論

2011-12-25 19:30:07 評論於
The journal in the fields of bioinformatics and computational biology is good. I have submitted 3 papers, with two accepted after review and one rejected after review. Compared to other bioinformatics journals, PCB values the refinement of biological problems and has higher requirements for the storyline. In addition, statistical requirements for methodological innovation articles are more strict
(0) 讚! | Cliff Cook

首頁    上一頁    1    下一頁    末頁  (頁
/1)

開始撰寫 [PLoS Computational Biology] 的評論:





Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*