What happened later?

(0) 讚！ | pupupupupu

Oh, um. Did you receive an email during the second review process? How did the editor respond?

(0) 讚！ | Rickey

请稍等一下，我需要一点时间来完成这项任务。

(0) 讚！ | PatrickPei

The first review has been three months, and it has been 20 days since the minor revisions were returned, still under review. Have any of you academicians experienced such a long time for minor revisions to be sent back for review? Should we send an email to inquire? The child is very anxious...

(4) 讚！ | Rickey

Do you think mSystems has a chance to compete in Zone 1? Personally, I think there might be a chance. Hahaha.

(4) 讚！ | Sci收收收

After two reminders, the chief editor finally discovered that the editor had left. It has been almost 100 days now....

(0) 讚！ | Rickey

We assigned the editor the next day, and shortly after that, it was completed.

(0) 讚！ | Sci收收收

Have you received the review comments? My paper has been under review for over 40 days and there has been no response.

(0) 讚！ | wy1123

May I ask how long it takes for the manuscript to be under review after "with editor"? It has been a week since I saw "with editor" status and it has not changed yet.

(0) 讚！ | 大锤ENT

How can I know if I have submitted for external review? As soon as it reaches the editor, it becomes U R.

(0) 讚！ | Sci收收收

About a week ago, the manuscript was assigned to an editor and then went Under Review. After a couple of days, the status changed to Reviewing Editor Assigned and the Editor changed to Not Assigned. What is going on? Has anyone else encountered the same issue?

(5) 讚！ | Rickey

The boss asked if "under review" in the hands of the editor is equivalent to external review. Will it be rejected?

(0) 讚！ | 言之命

1 week after submission, with editor for 2 months, no response from reviewers, received reply within a week after reminding, revised the manuscript based on editor and reviewers' comments (felt like peers, reviewers' comments were very targeted), took almost 1.5 months to supplement experimental results and resubmit, accepted a month later

(2) 讚！ | VBC主编

The overall process is fast, with the first external review taking 20 days, followed by revisions and resubmission, and the second external review taking 15 days

(4) 讚！ | 没有名字可以起了

Do you upload relevant omics data during the submission period?

(0) 讚！ | pollyQ

Submitted on September 27th, the next day UR (under review), received the first review comments on November 9th (minor revisions). Resubmitted on November 14th, and accepted on November 17th (delayed by 2 days due to formatting issues). The editing efficiency is truly high. It took about 50 days from submission to acceptance.

(34) 讚！ | pupupupupu

I envy you. I have been under review for 35 days with no progress.

(0) 讚！ | pupupupupu

2022.7.21 First submission; sent for review on 7.30; first round of review ended on 8.31, both reviewers provided very positive results, but the editor believed that some content still needed modification and concluded with a rejection and request for resubmission; revised and resubmitted on 9.6; reviewed by the editor on 9.12 (due to some minor issues on my part, the editor had to send it back twice which delayed the process); directly sent for review by the editor on 10.3; editor sent an email directly accepting the article. Article title: "The frequent occurrence and metabolic versatility of Marinifilaceae bacteria involved in organic matter mineralization as a key member in global deep sea".

(18) 讚！ | Oceanus

Friend, how did things turn out in the end?

(0) 讚！ | 一吃就胖小绮南

Friend, what happened in the end?

(0) 讚！ | 一吃就胖小绮南

2022-01-24 Manuscript Submission Incomplete
2022-01-24 Initial QC
2022-01-25 With Editor
2022-01-25 Reviewing Editor Assigned
2022-01-25 Under Review
2022-02-17 Reject: Allow Resubmission
2022-03-23 Manuscript Submission Incomplete
2022-03-23 With Editor
2022-03-24 Reviewing Editor Assigned
2022-03-24 Under Review
2022-04-09 Manuscript Accepted

The manuscript processing was very fast, with the first review result provided within 23 days. Both reviewers' comments were relatively positive, but the editor requested revisions and resubmission. After the revisions, the manuscript was reviewed for 17 days and accepted directly. It was a very smooth submission process. Moreover, today the journal's impact factor was just released, and it has reached 7.32. This journal is highly recognized, and it will continue to improve.

(6) 讚！ | tttttyyyyy

When describing your innovation, you should focus closely on the deficiencies of past research, and present a complete and clear description of your resolution strategy. To achieve creativity, you need to use introductory skills and write more content that is beneficial to yourself. In order to highlight the innovation of this study, it is necessary to select from numerous citations areas that can highlight the differences and characteristics of this study. For example: (1) time issues; (2) research methods issues; (3) research area issues; (4) uncertainty; (5) propose your own hypothesis for validation

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Introduction includes all or some of the following five items: introduction to the background, significance, current status (limitations) of the research field, the purpose of this study, and a brief summary of the research content

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How is the innovation of the article demonstrated in the introduction?

(1) 讚！ | 深渊兴业

What should an introduction include?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波