good

(0) 讚！ | ke

Hello. I would like to inquire about what should be filled in the Accession Numbers field under Dataset Deposition in the submission system

(0) 讚！ | NDVI

Dragon, be patient and wait, I believe in you

(0) 讚！ | 呱呱

The first round of reviews may take longer, there are many formatting requirements, and please remember to open-source your code

(0) 讚！ | 呱呱

It's been over ten days and I'm still on editor assignment. Are there really so few editors for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | guilong

Efficiency is quite high, and the editor has very high requirements for the article format. The main focus is on editing the format, which is very friendly for articles describing data

(42) 讚！ | 小白白

After submission, it is required to upload all raw data and corresponding reference numbers. Two reviewers provide feedback for revision. After making revisions, the manuscript is returned. The first reviewer approves the revised manuscript for acceptance, while the second reviewer continues to give feedback. However, the author is unable to comply with the suggestions made by the second reviewer. The author communicates with the editor, who ultimately decides that no further revisions are needed, and the manuscript is accepted. The entire process takes about 4 months

(0) 讚！ | 罗加菲尔德

Less than 2 months after the first review, the manuscript was sent back for major revisions. After additional validation experiments, the second review process took longer as a reviewer could not be found. Finally, after waiting from May to November, the manuscript was returned for minor revisions and finally published in December. Overall, apart from the slight exaggeration about editors struggling to find reviewers, the experience was quite positive

(1) 讚！ | ggbob

Repeatedly requested to upload a large amount of data and original images, including the requirement to make the code public, which took a week altogether. However, the next day after completion, it was instantly rejected! It's simply speechless. Since they are not interested, they could have read the article first and then asked the author to upload the data. Now those data cannot be withdrawn, it's really unreasonable, negative review!

(0) 讚！ | surgeon.zh

Hello, can you show me your review comments?

(0) 讚！ | hudingding

The first round of submission took 6 months, mainly due to the difficulty in finding reviewers. Two months later, there was a request for revision, followed by acceptance after one month of review. The reviewers' comments were very critical and greatly improved the article.

(0) 讚！ | aar3278

The editor's response is very prompt and meticulous. The reviewers are professional and rigorous. The overall review process is very punctual.

(0) 讚！ | kimkimkim

You can try submitting to ESSD, but it is very slow. I reviewed for seven months and my major revision was rejected.

(1) 讚！ | 倒霉蛋啊

Submit the manuscript on June 27th;
On June 28th, each author receives an email;
On June 30th, the QC results are returned, and because the article lacks "code availability," it is supplemented and resubmitted on the same day. The status shows "Initial QC Complete";
On July 2nd, the status changes to "Editor Assignment";
On July 5th, QC returns again, and the editor refuses to accept the SRA reviewer link, requesting the data to be made public and the link to be modified. After making the changes, it is resubmitted, and the status shows "Editor Assignment".

(0) 讚！ | cheer17

The editor is very polite and patient, with high efficiency and rigorous review. There are four reviewers, and three rounds of external review with constructive suggestions. They have high requirements for data quality, production process, metadata, and accuracy. Unpopular data requires interest and workload support.

(1) 讚！ | 谈波

Journal Introduction: Founded in 2014, the Impact Factor (IF) quickly rose to 6.4. As the only data journal under Nature, it is expected to continue to rise significantly.
Annual Publication Volume: Around 400 articles per year, averaging 1 article per day.
Review Speed: The review process is fast, with prompt feedback. Results are given within 3 months.
Submission Results: From submission to acceptance, there was one major revision in between and it has been accepted.
Experience Sharing: This journal places great emphasis on the rigor of data and the importance of data validation. The submission process involves stages such as assistant editor, editor, two reviewers, revision, re-review (with a different reviewer), editorial board, and chief editor, lasting for 1 year. In addition to data analysis, dataset creation, and writing, it takes a total of 2 years to complete. Therefore, one must be mentally prepared for long-term submissions.

(13) 讚！ | 问道琴声

Reviewing the manuscript took 3 months, and the results were given on time. After major revision, the results were given on time, i.e., 3 months. The speed is okay, the level of reviewers is uneven. Some are very strict; some others are much looser. In addition, the editor is quite responsible, and actively responded and solved the format issues or some other small problems. It is recommended trying if you have some good data. After all, the IF rises very fast.

(3) 讚！ | 沙雕外包放羊技校

They requested for uploading a lot of data, which delayed for a long time, and it was rejected without wending for an external review. It is impossible to withdraw the uploaded data. The key is that there is no other journal that can be submitted for this kind of manuscript.

(7) 讚！ | Dalicia