Reviewing one year, I find it difficult

(0) 讚！ | bjq

Submitted on April 22, 2023, feedback received on April 2, 2024. The reviewing process was extremely slow. Everyone else's children have already been born

(0) 讚！ | bjq

Submitted on April 22, 2023, it has been almost a year and it is still under review

(0) 讚！ | bjq

2021.10.05 New Submission
2021.10.08 Reviewers Assigned
2021.10.16 Under Review
2022.02.22 Major Revision
2022.03.06 Revision Submitted
2022.03.08 Under Review
2022.04.12 Editor Assigned
2022.04.19 Accept

Review process is slow, reminded twice during the first review, accepted after major revision, relatively smooth process, quite lucky.
The journal has a good quality and reputation, high recognition.

(0) 讚！ | SummyCH

Review speed was OK, and it took more than 7 months from submission to acceptance. 3 revisions, 3 reviewers in the first review, major revisions, 4 reviewers for the second review, revisions, and 2 reviewers for the third review, accepted after minor revisions. ~~~~~ Happy~~~~~

(2) 讚！ | 学而优则Shi

What I did is about the rock pore seepage. After reviewing the manuscript for two months, all three reviewers suggested minor revisions. Two of them had more than 10 opinions, and one had about 5. It was accepted directly one week after revisions. I feel that the overall level of the journal is pretty good in this direction, and there are very few worthless articles. Most of the reviewers are very serious and responsible. Currently it is a Q2 journal. I hope that the impact factor will rise next year, otherwise it will have to be categorized to Q3.

(0) 讚！ | 泡泡

Founded in 1986, the total number of articles published has been 3,533. In recent years, the publication has averaged around 180 articles per year. The review turnaround time is long and strict. It is generally with 3 reviewers in the field. At present, the number of domestic publications has increased to third place: 282. Nowadays as all pursuing of high IF and rapid publication, there are very few journals that can maintain a strict process without increasing the publication and citation. At the same time, I also want to thank Professor M. Blunt of Imperial College University for strict criterion. I hope the journal get better and better!

(3) 讚！ | 青椒不老

Review is slow.Four months in the first instance and four months in the second instance, there is no result yet.Please hurry up.

(0) 讚！ | LiZi2012

Compared to the top journal of fluid mechanics JFM (~890), you still have about 180 articles per year, hoping to speed up the quality of reviewing documents at the same time.

(0) 讚！ | 牛顿第二定律

The oldest top journal in the field of porous media, edited by Professor Blunt, Imperial College of the United Kingdom, with strict review, long cycle, high quality journal articles

(1) 讚！ | due to

Submission for 1 month, I hope to have a

(0) 讚！ | fslajhg

First trial for one and a half months, three reviewers, 2 overhauls, 1 minor repair, opinionsVery professional, revised tragedy, but it is indeed the essence of the article, rejected and no regrets

(1) 讚！ | 知了

This is the top journal in the field of porous media, but I don’t know why the Chinese Academy of Sciences does not list this as a TOP journal. The review took 10 months, and the first round included 5 reviewers. The comments were very professional. After the major revision, three reviewers asked for minor revision, after which the paper was accepted after half a month. In general, the journal reviewers' comments are very helpful, and the article has been greatly improved. The editor-in-chief is a professor at Imperial College of Science and Technology. He is very thorough and conscientious. The direction of his research is related to my article, so he also gave me some technical suggestions. Thank you! At present, the proportion of articles from China in the journal is about 6%. This is a very good journal; I hope it will be better and better!

(14) 讚！ | 加油向未来

Telling the truth is not too fast.The reason for refusal is to suggest a more professional petroleum journal, but the fact is that there is a choice of petroleum engineering items at the time, and an article on the oil and gas geology of the journal is also cited.In short, I don't understand what the editor thinks. I don't want to try the water if I want to use it urgently.

(0) 讚！ | Anonymous

From submission to employment for about 10 months, directly employed after two overhauls, more reviewers, 5 reviewers in first instance, 3 reviewers in second instance, and review in second instanceThe manuscript is also the first-instance. I feel that the revised comments given by the article are more coherent. I really feel that the level of the paper has increased a lot after the revision. I have benefited a lot from the first foreign-language publication.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This review is slower, but the draft is faster.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Is this journal very slow, submitted for 20 days, the state is still Editor Invited.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

This journal is a relatively professional journal in the field of porous media. I have reviewed it for about 2 months.Among them, the better feeling is that each author's mailbox must be provided when submitting the manuscript, and then the system will send an email to each author, and each author must log in to confirm the article.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

I think this journal is too slow, the speed of submission is OK, online is generally very fast, (my one is depressed, I don’t know where the problem has dragged on for two months, or I’m remindingSeveral times, they found that I have not received proof yet, but from the submission to the acceptance of at least half a year, my year and two months, changed five times before and after, a total of seven reviewers.I don't know if you are experiencing this situation?

(0) 讚！ | 匿名