May I ask if there are any results for my first round of revisions? I submitted them in February, but I haven't heard anything yet

(0) 讚！ | 西风英才

Have you received the first round of revisions back now? I submitted mine in February and still haven't received any results

(0) 讚！ | 西风英才

May I ask if there is a notification for submission for this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 白云曼妮

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Sharing experience: How long does it usually take for RETINA to accept the revision after the first review? My article was reviewed for 48 days, took 14 days to complete the revisions and resubmit after receiving the comments, and now it has been 14 days since the revision. Why haven't I received any news yet? I am getting a bit anxious about my article

(0) 讚！ | 墟散冷松

How did it end up? I can't find the status either!

(0) 讚！ | Winifred Finn

All rejection letters for the retina submissions are written like this

(0) 讚！ | Marjorie Malachi

The first clinical direction article I received was quite fortunate overall, because the professor's evaluation of my article was average and he felt that the content was too little. However, it may be more in line with the editor's taste. I submitted it on July 7th. On September 12th, I received minor revisions, but there were many opinions, mainly from the reviewers who raised some questions they were interested in, but they did not necessarily require modifications. Because it was my first time submitting an article, I took each comment seriously and tried my best to improve it. For the data that couldn't be supplemented, I politely declined. However, because I was preparing for my graduation defense, I kept procrastinating and only submitted the revised article on November 30th after being reminded. It was officially accepted on December 19th. I think retina is relatively recognized for physicians in the field of fundus diseases. At least, it was a dream come true for me to have a retina article. The only downside is that it takes 6-9 months from acceptance to formal publication (I have seen articles submitted by my previous supervisor taking up to 1 year). Maybe it's because they only publish around 300 articles per year. However, it is very unfriendly for students who need to provide WOS retrieval for job applications. Finally, I sincerely thank retina and hope that in the future, I can break free from the shadow of my supervisor and continue to work hard to do meaningful clinical work.

(9) 讚！ | mikerobort

Sufficient experimental data results and well-written articles

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

For those scoring 7 or above, only additional data results are required for article submission

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What preparations are needed for outdoor activities?

(0) 讚！ | Darlene Pepys

Why do I think my article deserves only 3-4 points, but my teacher wants to start with 7 points or more?

(0) 讚！ | 北国博达

Research focus: Retinal diseases
Experience sharing: Can I ask how long the external review will take? It's been two months and still no news... I can't find out the status either

(0) 讚！ | 马克尤尔

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: It took two months for the review process, and out of the four expert reviewers, two did not carefully read the article. The issues they seriously questioned were actually explained in the text. They believed that I did not provide information which I actually did provide. Furthermore, they did not have the patience to look at my experimental design, and did not understand the purpose of my article. Their suggestions were both frustrating and comical. On the other hand, the other two experts carefully read the article and provided valuable detailed suggestions. Unfortunately, the article was rejected, and there was no opportunity for further modification or explanation. In conclusion: a poor submission experience

(0) 讚！ | Marguerite Defoe

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0
Sharing of experience: After two months of review, out of the four reviewers, two of them did not carefully read the article. The issues they seriously questioned were actually explained in the text. They thought that the content I did not specify was actually mentioned, and they did not have the patience to look at my experimental group design or understand the purpose of my article. The suggestions they made were both funny and frustrating. The other two experts carefully read the article and provided valuable suggestions on some details. Unfortunately, the article was rejected, and there is no way to further modify or explain it. Summary: Poor submission experience

(0) 讚！ | Marguerite Defoe

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0
Experience sharing: In the two months of review, out of 4 reviewers, 2 of them did not carefully read the article. The issues they seriously questioned were actually explained in the text. They believed that I did not disclose certain details, which I had actually disclosed. Furthermore, they did not have the patience to look at my experimental design or understand the purpose of my article. Their suggestions were quite confusing. On the other hand, 2 reviewers carefully read the article and provided valuable detailed suggestions. Unfortunately, the article was rejected, and I am unable to further modify or explain. In summary, the submission experience was poor

(0) 讚！ | Marguerite Defoe

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: I am also amazed by this journal, it's very unprofessional. External review takes three months. If they didn't like it at first, they should just reject it directly, but in the end, there was a ridiculous scene.
"Your manuscript has been considered for publication by reviewers for the journal RETINA. While we receive and review many excellent papers, we are able to accept only a small number of these submissions. Unfortunately your manuscript has not been selected for publishing in this journal." A warning at the end, this journal is not fair. Unprofessional

(0) 讚！ | 形意耕顺

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: The review speed is as slow as a snail, almost on par with domestic journals. I am speechless

(0) 讚！ | 形意耕顺

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 
Experience sharing: Mainly clinical articles, scoring relatively high in ophthalmology, and not easy to handle

(0) 讚！ | 形意耕顺

Does anyone know what kind of articles this magazine usually accepts? I am working on a basic experiment on retinal fundus, can I submit?

(0) 讚！ | 澄静芮安

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" and "

(0) 讚！ | 孤云平彤

Can we score 3 points next year? Let's discuss

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

SCI(2010): 2.774 SCI(2009): 2.932

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁